Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 98768 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #735 on: April 12, 2017, 08:35:38 PM »
now where have i heard that a million times before....originality....LOL

Roughly 70 times per day for your entire life. How sad.
Or could it be you are telling porkies or exaggerating again?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #736 on: April 12, 2017, 08:47:44 PM »
Roughly 70 times per day for your entire life. How sad.
Or could it be you are telling porkies or exaggerating again?

same old comment...getting the same reply....or using a figure of speech

Offline slartibartfast

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #737 on: April 12, 2017, 09:11:22 PM »
After the way they were shamefully accused in their arguido interviews, why do you suppose they would trust further proposed actions?

That's one of the reasons people are made arguidos, so that they can be asked accusing questions.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #738 on: April 12, 2017, 09:20:51 PM »
same old comment...getting the same reply....or using a figure of speech

I am not the tea pot boasting about how I am Mr Precision.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #739 on: April 12, 2017, 09:25:17 PM »
I am not the tea pot boasting about how I am Mr Precision.

have you not heard of a metaphor....or was your education purely science based

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #740 on: April 12, 2017, 09:33:07 PM »
After the way they were shamefully accused in their arguido interviews, why do you suppose they would trust further proposed actions?

It wasn't about them, it was about co-operating with the investigation into the disappearance of their daughter.


Jon Gaunt
Published: 16 May 2008
 
WHAT is it with the McCanns? They say they will do anything to help find Maddie but are still dragging their feet over returning to Portugal for a reconstruction of the fateful night when they left Maddie and her twin siblings home alone.
 
Sources close to them say they have "serious reservations".
 
Why? What serious reservations?
 
Their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, asks: "What is the value?"
 
So now this ex-BBC reporter, Government spin doctor and PR man is suddenly Columbo or Morse, is he?
 

I'm sorry, but let's remember they are still prime suspects and if the Portuguese plods want them in Portugal they should be there — reservations or not.

Kelvin MacKenzie (Editor of the Sun 1981-1994)
29/05/2008
 
I am puzzled at the refusal of the McCanns to fly to the Algarve today for a police reconstruction of the night Madeleine disappeared.
 
It is said they are suspicous of police motives and do not believe it will help find their daughter.
Are they really the best placed people to make that decision?
after all, they remain the leading suspects in the case and despite Portuguese police handling the investigation badly, the law remains their best hope for justice.
 
Already the McCanns have tried worldwide publicity - including roping in the pope - and that didn't work.
 
They have taken the public's money and spent it on £50,000-a-month private detectives, and that certainly hasn't worked.
 
Those with decent memories may well recall these private eyes claiming they would have Madeleine home by christmas.
 
So why wouldn't the Mccanns and the Tapas seven try one more throw of the dice ? according to a "friend", it would have disrupted their family and business schedules.
 
Their "schedules" have already been disrupted and tragically will remain so for as long as Madeleine remains missing.
 
Could I urge them to have a change of heart and co-operate with the police.
 
Until they do so my personal jury will remain out.

Carole Malone
01/06/2008
 
So, it isn't just Kate and Gerry who have refused to go back to Portugal for a police reconstuction of Maddies disappearance.
 
We now learn that at least four of the Tapas seven have also refused because they too left their kids alone when they went drinking that fateful night.
 
Are they worried that like the McCanns, they might also become suspects?
 
Er, so what happened to the "We'll do whatever is necessary to find Maddie" mantra? Did that come with the proviso that they'll do "whatever's necessary" as long as it doesn't embarrass them, inconvenience them or put them in any personal danger?
 
Anyway, I don't see the problem. If these people have nothing to hide, if they really DO want to help find Maddie, why haven't they already hauled their backsides back to Portugal?
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id118.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #741 on: April 12, 2017, 09:50:31 PM »
It wasn't about them, it was about co-operating with the investigation into the disappearance of their daughter.


Jon Gaunt
Published: 16 May 2008
 
WHAT is it with the McCanns? They say they will do anything to help find Maddie but are still dragging their feet over returning to Portugal for a reconstruction of the fateful night when they left Maddie and her twin siblings home alone.
 
Sources close to them say they have "serious reservations".
 
Why? What serious reservations?
 
Their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, asks: "What is the value?"
 
So now this ex-BBC reporter, Government spin doctor and PR man is suddenly Columbo or Morse, is he?
 

I'm sorry, but let's remember they are still prime suspects and if the Portuguese plods want them in Portugal they should be there — reservations or not.

Kelvin MacKenzie (Editor of the Sun 1981-1994)
29/05/2008
 
I am puzzled at the refusal of the McCanns to fly to the Algarve today for a police reconstruction of the night Madeleine disappeared.
 
It is said they are suspicous of police motives and do not believe it will help find their daughter.
Are they really the best placed people to make that decision?
after all, they remain the leading suspects in the case and despite Portuguese police handling the investigation badly, the law remains their best hope for justice.
 
Already the McCanns have tried worldwide publicity - including roping in the pope - and that didn't work.
 
They have taken the public's money and spent it on £50,000-a-month private detectives, and that certainly hasn't worked.
 
Those with decent memories may well recall these private eyes claiming they would have Madeleine home by christmas.
 
So why wouldn't the Mccanns and the Tapas seven try one more throw of the dice ? according to a "friend", it would have disrupted their family and business schedules.
 
Their "schedules" have already been disrupted and tragically will remain so for as long as Madeleine remains missing.
 
Could I urge them to have a change of heart and co-operate with the police.
 
Until they do so my personal jury will remain out.

Carole Malone
01/06/2008
 
So, it isn't just Kate and Gerry who have refused to go back to Portugal for a police reconstuction of Maddies disappearance.
 
We now learn that at least four of the Tapas seven have also refused because they too left their kids alone when they went drinking that fateful night.
 
Are they worried that like the McCanns, they might also become suspects?
 
Er, so what happened to the "We'll do whatever is necessary to find Maddie" mantra? Did that come with the proviso that they'll do "whatever's necessary" as long as it doesn't embarrass them, inconvenience them or put them in any personal danger?
 
Anyway, I don't see the problem. If these people have nothing to hide, if they really DO want to help find Maddie, why haven't they already hauled their backsides back to Portugal?
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id118.htm

McCanns must not return to Portugal Daily Express (No online link)
 
Richard Madeley
12th April 2008
 
Sources cose to Kate and Gerry McCann have indicated they are most unlikely to comply with a request that they return to Praia de Luz.

Police there want them to take part in a large-scale re-enactment of the minutes and hours following Madeleine's disappearance. The couple are quite right to turn down this invitation.

The whole thing has the authentic smell of a trap. What can such a re-enactment possibly achieve nearly a year on from that dreadful night? Nothing. The trail went cold months ago thanks to the idiotic blundering of Praia de Luz's finest.

No. The Poruguese police want Kate and Gerry back in their jurisdiction for their own private reasons.

The couple remain official suspects but could never to extradited back to Portugal: there isn't a scintilla of evidence against them. This new proposal is, to my suspicious and cynical eye, an attempt to lure the couple back there, along with the friends who were with them the night Madeleine vanished, so they can be re-arrested.

The police could pounce on the tiniest discrepancy in what anyone said and blow it up out of all proportion.

And now as I write this, come reports of a new smear on the couple from Portuguese police.

I rest my case.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #742 on: April 12, 2017, 09:54:42 PM »
McCanns must not return to Portugal Daily Express (No online link)
 
Richard Madeley
12th April 2008
 
Sources cose to Kate and Gerry McCann have indicated they are most unlikely to comply with a request that they return to Praia de Luz.

Police there want them to take part in a large-scale re-enactment of the minutes and hours following Madeleine's disappearance. The couple are quite right to turn down this invitation.

The whole thing has the authentic smell of a trap. What can such a re-enactment possibly achieve nearly a year on from that dreadful night? Nothing. The trail went cold months ago thanks to the idiotic blundering of Praia de Luz's finest.

No. The Poruguese police want Kate and Gerry back in their jurisdiction for their own private reasons.

The couple remain official suspects but could never to extradited back to Portugal: there isn't a scintilla of evidence against them. This new proposal is, to my suspicious and cynical eye, an attempt to lure the couple back there, along with the friends who were with them the night Madeleine vanished, so they can be re-arrested.

The police could pounce on the tiniest discrepancy in what anyone said and blow it up out of all proportion.

And now as I write this, come reports of a new smear on the couple from Portuguese police.

I rest my case.
Praia de Luz's finest?   @)(++(*
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #743 on: April 12, 2017, 09:55:07 PM »
Praia de Luz's finest?   @)(++(*

yes....LOL

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #744 on: April 12, 2017, 09:58:54 PM »
McCanns must not return to Portugal Daily Express (No online link)
 
Richard Madeley
12th April 2008
 
Sources cose to Kate and Gerry McCann have indicated they are most unlikely to comply with a request that they return to Praia de Luz.

Police there want them to take part in a large-scale re-enactment of the minutes and hours following Madeleine's disappearance. The couple are quite right to turn down this invitation.

The whole thing has the authentic smell of a trap. What can such a re-enactment possibly achieve nearly a year on from that dreadful night? Nothing. The trail went cold months ago thanks to the idiotic blundering of Praia de Luz's finest.

No. The Poruguese police want Kate and Gerry back in their jurisdiction for their own private reasons.

The couple remain official suspects but could never to extradited back to Portugal: there isn't a scintilla of evidence against them. This new proposal is, to my suspicious and cynical eye, an attempt to lure the couple back there, along with the friends who were with them the night Madeleine vanished, so they can be re-arrested.

The police could pounce on the tiniest discrepancy in what anyone said and blow it up out of all proportion.

And now as I write this, come reports of a new smear on the couple from Portuguese police.

I rest my case.

I remember him.

He claimed some people were jealous of Kate Mccann's looks. *&*%£

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #745 on: April 12, 2017, 10:00:41 PM »
yes....LOL
Just who are Luz's finest?  Given that we have no GNR station, no PJ station, no bombeiros station.

 @)(++(*
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #746 on: April 12, 2017, 10:07:44 PM »
Just who are Luz's finest?  Given that we have no GNR station, no PJ station, no bombeiros station.

 @)(++(*

i can work it out  why cant you    ...because you want to divert from the valid points he makes
« Last Edit: April 12, 2017, 10:09:57 PM by davel »

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #747 on: April 12, 2017, 10:10:08 PM »
i can work it out  why cant you
0/10.  Must try harder.

 8((()*/
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #748 on: April 12, 2017, 10:11:36 PM »
0/10.  Must try harder.

 8((()*/

diversion noted to avoid the very valid points made in the article

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #749 on: April 12, 2017, 10:35:23 PM »
diversion noted to avoid the very valid points made in the article
So who are Luz's finest?
What's up, old man?