Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[Mr Gray]

Try reading the amended post.

So you have corrected your mistake
Now read my amended post and then you can amend your post again

[Eleanor]

So where is the body?  Madeline is more likely to be alive than dead if they have found no body.  And The Dogs of all investigations have found No Body.

I don't understand why some people can't see this.

[barrier]

So where is the body?  Madeline is more likely to be alive than dead if they have found no body.  And The Dogs of all investigations have found No Body.

I don't understand why some people can't see this.

Where is Muriel McKay,where is Charlotte Pinckney,where is Mark Tildesley plus many more all missing no body but murder convictions in at least two of them,now I'm not suggesting this what happened to Madeleine but no body  does not suggest she is alive any more than being dead.

[Eleanor]

Where is Muriel McKay,where is Charlotte Pinckney,where is Mark Tildesley plus many more all missing no body but murder convictions in at least two of them,now I'm not suggesting this what happened to Madeleine but no body  does not suggest she is alive any more than being dead.

Did these cases happen on home territory?  Was there other evidence to suggest death?

[stephen25000]

So you have corrected your mistake
Now read my amended post and then you can amend your post again

No need.

[stephen25000]

So where is the body?  Madeline is more likely to be alive than dead if they have found no body.  And The Dogs of all investigations have found No Body.

I don't understand why some people can't see this.

I'm afraid Eleanor, you have this the wrong way round.

The statistics as regards missing children are very clear.

For example, The Golden Hour.

The sheer fact, that despite the worldwide coverage of this case, in nearly 10 years, not one sign of Madeleine has emerged.

[ferryman]

I'm afraid Eleanor, you have this the wrong way round.

The statistics as regards missing children are very clear.

For example, The Golden Hour.

The sheer fact, that despite the worldwide coverage of this case, in nearly 10 years, not one sign of Madeleine has emerged.

Including that no remains have been found, if you like, evidence that Madeleine is alive.

[ShiningInLuz]

But three days later and with the change in Law, The PJ would not have been allowed to do this.

What does that tell you?

I don't want to haggle over the date the law changed.  I believe Brietta has previously stated 8 days.

But I don't think it makes a difference.  The trigger was the McCanns making plain before the interviews that they were to leave Portugal in the near future.

You have seen the rigmarole that occurs when OG wants to interview someone, whether as a witness or an arguido, in Portugal.  There is another case active in Portugal where the 'suspect' has moved to Brazil, and people here are indignant because they don't understand why the man has not been arrested in Brazil.  They don't understand the process one sovereign country has to go through when the alleged suspect is in another sovereign country.

As to what might have happened if the McCanns had not made plain they were leaving, who knows.

The reason I say this is because I am bemused by what evidence OG can possibly have for their 4 arguidos, but it seems to have sufficed for whoever in Portugal assesses the request and decides whether to grant it or not.

[faithlilly]

Did they accuse her of hiding her child's body?  Why did they assume she had not murdered her child in cold blood then?

They had no proof that the McCanns intentionally killed their daughter?

[stephen25000]

Including that no remains have been found, if you like, evidence that Madeleine is alive.

So where would she be if alive ?

Now that is the question no McCann supporter seems to want to answer.

Yet they pursue it IMO , to protect the Mccanns.

[Mr Gray]

I don't want to haggle over the date the law changed.  I believe Brietta has previously stated 8 days.

But I don't think it makes a difference.  The trigger was the McCanns making plain before the interviews that they were to leave Portugal in the near future.

You have seen the rigmarole that occurs when OG wants to interview someone, whether as a witness or an arguido, in Portugal.  There is another case active in Portugal where the 'suspect' has moved to Brazil, and people here are indignant because they don't understand why the man has not been arrested in Brazil.  They don't understand the process one sovereign country has to go through when the alleged suspect is in another sovereign country.

As to what might have happened if the McCanns had not made plain they were leaving, who knows.

The reason I say this is because I am bemused by what evidence OG can possibly have for their 4 arguidos, but it seems to have sufficed for whoever in Portugal assesses the request and decides whether to grant it or not.

As far as I can remember the McCanns didn't say they were going to leave Portugal until after the arguidos interview
I also seem to remember that they had to have permission from the pj to leave

[Mr Gray]

So where would she be if alive ?

Now that is the question no McCann supporter seems to want to answer.

Yet they pursue it IMO , to protect the Mccanns.

The possibility that Maddie is alive is a fact
Where she might be is speculation

[stephen25000]

As far as I can remember the McCanns didn't say they were going to leave Portugal until after the arguidos interview
I also seem to remember that they had to have permission from the pj to leave

They promised to stay in Portugal until Madeleine was found.............................

[stephen25000]

The possibility that Maddie is alive is a fact
Where she might be is speculation

No, it is speculation she is alive.

After all, in most cases, you know what happens in UK Courts after 7 years have elapsed.

[Mr Gray]

No, it is speculation she is alive.

After all, in most cases, you know what happens in UK Courts after 7 years have elapsed.

I didn't say she is alive LOL
You never learn