Madeleine parents anguish as Amaral prepares to publish another book.

[John]

Madeleine McCann’s parents face fresh torment as Portuguese ex-policeman who made shocking claims that they covered up their daughter’s death prepares to publish a SECOND book.



   * Goncalo Amaral claimed Madeleine died in 2007 and her parents covered it up
   * He would publish a book in 2008 making claims about Kate and Gerry McCann
   * The former police chief is now putting final touches to a second explosive tale
   * However McCanns have claimed that no British publisher 'will dare touch' book

By Alexander Robertson For Mailonline

Published: 30 March 2017


The former police chief who shockingly claimed the McCann's covered up their daughter's death is preparing to publish a second explosive book.



Goncalo Amaral claimed that Madeleine died in 2007 and her parents covered it up, sparking a huge police response both from the UK and abroad.

He published a book in 2008 making his claims and Kate and Gerry McCann, parents of Madeleine, who has been missing for nearly a decade, tried to sue him for libel.

He is now putting the final touches to a second book and is said to be looking for a British publisher.

However the McCanns, who have previously dubbed Amaral's version of events as 'poisonous lies', claim 'no publisher will dare touch it', according to The Sun.

A source said: 'If Mr Amaral’s attempts to get his current book or his new one about Madeleine published in the UK lawyers will take immediate action.'

Mr Amaral worked on the case when Madeleine, then three, went missing from the apartment the McCanns were staying in at Praia da Luz as Kate and Gerry ate dinner with friends.

He was moved off the case and resigned six months later but wrote his book using police files as he put forward a theory she had died in the apartment.

Amaral published a book in 2008 making his claims and Kate and Gerry McCann, parents of Madeleine, who has been missing for nearly a decade, tried to sue him for libel.

The McCanns took legal action, saying there was no evidence and his work was defamatory.

The appeal hearing in Lisbon which ruled against the McCanns was held in private.

Mr Amaral, 56, who the McCanns first sued for libel in June 2009, won the lengthy legal fight after judges decided he had the 'right to freedom of expression'.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4366008/Madeleine-McCann-ex-policeman-publish-SECOND-book.html#ixzz4cx6fegHo

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3217939/madeleine-mccann-parents-kate-gerry-cop-goncalo-amaral-second-book-10th-anniversary-disappearance/

201

[barrier]

Just a rehash of previous stories.nothing of substance concerning any content in the new book,still its all good publicity he doesn't need any publicist.

[G-Unit]

Have they decided not to tackle him on his home ground this time? It looks like it.

[Lace]

So, said he wrote his first book for his 'honour'    so why the second book?

Why have it published to correspond with 10th anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance?   To me it just looks like spite,  getting back at the McCann's,  which is what the first book was all about too.

[kizzy]

So, said he wrote his first book for his 'honour'    so why the second book?

Why have it published to correspond with 10th anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance?   To me it just looks like spite,  getting back at the McCann's,  which is what the first book was all about too.

It will never match up to the spite of the mccanns. IMO

[stephen25000]

So, said he wrote his first book for his 'honour'    so why the second book?

Why have it published to correspond with 10th anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance?   To me it just looks like spite,  getting back at the McCann's,  which is what the first book was all about too.

That Lace is hypocrisy.

What do you think the Mccann's pursuit of Amaral through the courts was all about.


"He deserves to be miserable and feel fear." Kate McCann's words in the book  'Madeleine',

[kizzy]

Why shouldn't he write another book, no one knows what is going to be in it yet.

He has gone through pain and suffering, through not fault of his own.

All he did was trying to do was his job, and could have lost everything.

[Erngath]

Why shouldn't he write another book, no one knows what is going to be in it yet.

He has gone through pain and suffering, through not fault of his own.

All he did was trying to do was his job, and could have lost everything.

" no one knows what is going to be in it yet" , this is very true.
He might admit his failings, his errorrs and apologise to the McCann family for all the "pain and suffering" he caused them.

[Lace]

It will never match up to the spite of the mccanns. IMO

What spite?

Do you mean them taking him to court?

Amaral didn't have to write his book did he?    He didn't have to accuse the McCann's of drugging their children and hiding her body did he?   

If you had a book written like that about you I don't expect you would just ignore it,  especially if your child was missing and the book says your child is dead.

[stephen25000]

" no one knows what is going to be in it yet" , this is very true.
He might admit his failings, his errorrs and apologise to the McCann family for all the "pain and suffering" he caused them.

The ''pain and suffering'' are a result of the mccanns actions.

Not Amaral.

[barrier]

Its paper talk that a book is to be published to correspond with the 10th anniversary (is that the right word) no such thing as bad publicity and of course there are those that will swallow it up to feel offended.

[Lace]

Why shouldn't he write another book, no one knows what is going to be in it yet.

He has gone through pain and suffering, through not fault of his own.

All he did was trying to do was his job, and could have lost everything.

Amaral decided to retire,  no one made him.   He decided to write a book,  no one made him.

[kizzy]

What spite?

Do you mean them taking him to court?

Amaral didn't have to write his book did he?    He didn't have to accuse the McCann's of drugging their children and hiding her body did he?   

If you had a book written like that about you I don't expect you would just ignore it,  especially if your child was missing and the book says your child is dead.

Excuse me, the mccanns didn't have to leave the children alone - did they

[Lace]

That Lace is hypocrisy.

What do you think the Mccann's pursuit of Amaral through the courts was all about.


"He deserves to be miserable and feel fear." Kate McCann's words in the book  'Madeleine',

The McCann's pursuit of Amaral through the courts was to stop the selling of his book,   telling the world they drugged their children and hid her body.   Plus saying their child was dead without proof,  and if you say you wouldn't have done the same then I wouldn't believe you.    You are quick to say you are reporting someone when  they are nasty to you on this forum,  let alone writing a book like the one Amaral wrote,  imagine if that book had been about YOU.

Amaral made the McCann's feel miserable and fearful,  he said they had found 100% DNA of Madeleine's which was a lie,   it must have frightened the life out of them thinking Madeleine was dead.   How much misery and fear do you think his book caused ?

[kizzy]

Amaral decided to retire,  no one made him.   He decided to write a book,  no one made him.

Someone made him come off the case, what would have happened if he had stayed on it - we will never know.