Author Topic: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?  (Read 550267 times)

0 Members and 62 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline adam

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #600 on: May 27, 2018, 03:19:58 PM »
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9466.msg439513/topicseen.html#msg439513

Nigel is off again. Away from the CT, supporters still have specific roles.

Nigel manages his 'countdown', 'Stephen Kavanagh' & 'reward threads'. Mike posts his theories, Nugs his conspiracy theories. Mike with sources, Nugs without.

Lookout says 'Jeremy is innocent' & Roch likes to muddy the waters.

David monitors the Blue forum 24/7 & will surface on it if a guilter posts. Usually to focus on the guilter rather than the post.

Offline Real justice

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #601 on: May 27, 2018, 06:26:25 PM »
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9466.msg439513/topicseen.html#msg439513

Nigel is off again. Away from the CT, supporters still have specific roles.

Nigel manages his 'countdown', 'Stephen Kavanagh' & 'reward threads'. Mike posts his theories, Nugs his conspiracy theories. Mike with sources, Nugs without.

Lookout says 'Jeremy is innocent' & Roch likes to muddy the waters.

David monitors the Blue forum 24/7 & will surface on it if a guilter posts. Usually to focus on the guilter rather than the post.
So nothings changed then  @)(++(*

Offline John

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #602 on: June 01, 2018, 01:08:20 PM »
Memo:

A reminder to all posters to keep comments constructive and amicable. Attack opinion by all means but please do not make personal comments towards fellow members. This forum prides itself in allowing all shades of opinion so please bear this in mind when responding. TY and have a pleasant weekend.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #603 on: June 04, 2018, 02:15:07 PM »
Further to John's post above I have just removed a couple of posts.

If a member experiences problems please use the 'report to moderator' function or pm a moderator with a link to the relevant post(s) at the earliest opportunity.  The removed posts relate to a comment made in April. 

Thank you.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #604 on: June 05, 2018, 02:34:15 PM »
David now claiming Dr Craig was called to WHF to subdue SC:

Dr Craig was called to attend the scene under the impression he would be needed to help the police subdue Sheila. When he arrived he had nothing to do other than declare them dead. He spent around fifteen minutes inside the farm house.

Had the chain of communication got the fact of no survivors to him sooner, he would not have attended and the five dead would have been certified/declared dead by a doctor on arrival at the autopsy facility instead.

Dr Craig is of no real significance. His job was to help the police manage difficult people and difficult situations not investigate the aftermath.


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9428.msg440130.html?PHPSESSID=a0lfinonb0k7lgt43mtrhalos7#msg440130

As usual with David he gets everything wrong.  Chief Sup Harris contacted Dr Craig after the raid team entered and found 1 adult male, 2 adult females and 2 children all presumed dead.  Dr Craig's main objective was to  certify the deaths and to confirm whether or not JB was fit to be interviewed/provide a ws.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

And Lookout you have no evidence Dr Craig had any issues with alcohol.  If the late Dr Craig's family read these forums I hope they look to take action against those who spread malicious rumours about him.  You, David and Gladys are up in arms about the rumours spread about JB and yet can't see you do the exact same thing.  And Gladys supposedly a Christian! 

Lookout you just can't help yourself can you?  This is the reason you're despised.  You constantly bad mouth people eg SC promiscuous and now suggesting Dr Craig had issues with alcohol despite the fact you have zero evidence for either.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

At the time of WHF Dr Craig had been a police surgeon for more than 30 years and was president of the police surgeons assoc.  There's no evidence he was anything other than a credible and reliable expert witness.  Do you have any evidence to the contrary eg complaints to the GMC?  If you do post them up.  If you don't then I suggest you put a sock in it. 

Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #605 on: June 05, 2018, 03:51:13 PM »
David now claiming Dr Craig was called to WHF to subdue SC:

Dr Craig was called to attend the scene under the impression he would be needed to help the police subdue Sheila. When he arrived he had nothing to do other than declare them dead. He spent around fifteen minutes inside the farm house.

Had the chain of communication got the fact of no survivors to him sooner, he would not have attended and the five dead would have been certified/declared dead by a doctor on arrival at the autopsy facility instead.

Dr Craig is of no real significance. His job was to help the police manage difficult people and difficult situations not investigate the aftermath.


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9428.msg440130.html?PHPSESSID=a0lfinonb0k7lgt43mtrhalos7#msg440130

As usual with David he gets everything wrong.  Chief Sup Harris contacted Dr Craig after the raid team entered and found 1 adult male, 2 adult females and 2 children all presumed dead.  Dr Craig's main objective was to  certify the deaths and to confirm whether or not JB was fit to be interviewed/provide a ws.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

And Lookout you have no evidence Dr Craig had any issues with alcohol.  If the late Dr Craig's family read these forums I hope they look to take action against those who spread malicious rumours about him.  You, David and Gladys are up in arms about the rumours spread about JB and yet can't see you do the exact same thing.  And Gladys supposedly a Christian! 

Lookout you just can't help yourself can you?  This is the reason you're despised.  You constantly bad mouth people eg SC promiscuous and now suggesting Dr Craig had issues with alcohol despite the fact you have zero evidence for either.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

At the time of WHF Dr Craig had been a police surgeon for more than 30 years and was president of the police surgeons assoc.  There's no evidence he was anything other than a credible and reliable expert witness.  Do you have any evidence to the contrary eg complaints to the GMC?  If you do post them up.  If you don't then I suggest you put a sock in it.

David doesn't see the need to back up his posts - his word is enough to make it a fact - in his world.

Offline ActualMat

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #606 on: June 05, 2018, 04:38:11 PM »
David doesn't see the need to back up his posts - his word is enough to make it a fact - in his world.

I wonder why the change of stance on Dr Craig? He's been used to prove points in the past... but now he seems to be being dismissed as not important..

As for supporters... Anyone else shocked with the utter shit that racist bitch Lookout is posting? It's not the first time she's been openly racist, last time dissing Romanians saying she'd "step over them in the streets".

Offline adam

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #607 on: June 05, 2018, 05:43:13 PM »
David now claiming Dr Craig was called to WHF to subdue SC:

Dr Craig was called to attend the scene under the impression he would be needed to help the police subdue Sheila. When he arrived he had nothing to do other than declare them dead. He spent around fifteen minutes inside the farm house.

Had the chain of communication got the fact of no survivors to him sooner, he would not have attended and the five dead would have been certified/declared dead by a doctor on arrival at the autopsy facility instead.

Dr Craig is of no real significance. His job was to help the police manage difficult people and difficult situations not investigate the aftermath.


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9428.msg440130.html?PHPSESSID=a0lfinonb0k7lgt43mtrhalos7#msg440130

As usual with David he gets everything wrong.  Chief Sup Harris contacted Dr Craig after the raid team entered and found 1 adult male, 2 adult females and 2 children all presumed dead.  Dr Craig's main objective was to  certify the deaths and to confirm whether or not JB was fit to be interviewed/provide a ws.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

And Lookout you have no evidence Dr Craig had any issues with alcohol.  If the late Dr Craig's family read these forums I hope they look to take action against those who spread malicious rumours about him.  You, David and Gladys are up in arms about the rumours spread about JB and yet can't see you do the exact same thing.  And Gladys supposedly a Christian! 

Lookout you just can't help yourself can you?  This is the reason you're despised.  You constantly bad mouth people eg SC promiscuous and now suggesting Dr Craig had issues with alcohol despite the fact you have zero evidence for either.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

At the time of WHF Dr Craig had been a police surgeon for more than 30 years and was president of the police surgeons assoc.  There's no evidence he was anything other than a credible and reliable expert witness.  Do you have any evidence to the contrary eg complaints to the GMC?  If you do post them up.  If you don't then I suggest you put a sock in it.

I gave up on the Hugo Boss thread after 2 pages. Even though I created it ! Ditto every other recent thread.

Lookout is having conversations with another poster which will last several weeks. Or months.

Offline ActualMat

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #608 on: June 05, 2018, 08:22:23 PM »
Lookout is just proving herself to be a liar, she did call me a white trash, she did call me a fairy, she did say she'd step over romanians in the street and was sick of them. She DID call April a "LIAR!"

But she denies it all getting worse and worse with a trial of deciet, lies and a bunch of people who can't stand her - and its' not just on the red and blue forums.

Offline Real justice

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #609 on: June 05, 2018, 10:13:41 PM »
David now claiming Dr Craig was called to WHF to subdue SC:

Dr Craig was called to attend the scene under the impression he would be needed to help the police subdue Sheila. When he arrived he had nothing to do other than declare them dead. He spent around fifteen minutes inside the farm house.

Had the chain of communication got the fact of no survivors to him sooner, he would not have attended and the five dead would have been certified/declared dead by a doctor on arrival at the autopsy facility instead.

Dr Craig is of no real significance. His job was to help the police manage difficult people and difficult situations not investigate the aftermath.


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9428.msg440130.html?PHPSESSID=a0lfinonb0k7lgt43mtrhalos7#msg440130

As usual with David he gets everything wrong.  Chief Sup Harris contacted Dr Craig after the raid team entered and found 1 adult male, 2 adult females and 2 children all presumed dead.  Dr Craig's main objective was to  certify the deaths and to confirm whether or not JB was fit to be interviewed/provide a ws.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

And Lookout you have no evidence Dr Craig had any issues with alcohol.  If the late Dr Craig's family read these forums I hope they look to take action against those who spread malicious rumours about him.  You, David and Gladys are up in arms about the rumours spread about JB and yet can't see you do the exact same thing.  And Gladys supposedly a Christian! 

Lookout you just can't help yourself can you?  This is the reason you're despised.  You constantly bad mouth people eg SC promiscuous and now suggesting Dr Craig had issues with alcohol despite the fact you have zero evidence for either.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=157.0

At the time of WHF Dr Craig had been a police surgeon for more than 30 years and was president of the police surgeons assoc.  There's no evidence he was anything other than a credible and reliable expert witness.  Do you have any evidence to the contrary eg complaints to the GMC?  If you do post them up.  If you don't then I suggest you put a sock in it.
Good post Holly, it’s always the same, they cannot discuss the case civil, it has to end up where they slander the person with untruths and offer no evidence and then  try to belittle and slander, either the Expert or family member, hoping that mud sticks, doesn’t matter this person has a family and might have children themselves.  They hide under the umbrella of thug Tesko and try to be like him and think they are immune from prosecution, rest assured they are not

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #610 on: June 06, 2018, 09:19:50 AM »
Lookout, Gladys spreading malicious gossip and rumors about Dr Craig isn't evidence of anything.  It's akin to JM, BW and AE et al saying this that and the other about JB.  Do you not understand, you silly old goat.  Evidence of a medi doctor either incompetent, negligent or engaged in some sort of wrongdoing against his/her code of ethics would be for example some disciplinary measures taken by the General Medical Council.  Do you have any such evidence? No you don't so I suggest you put a sock in it and stop spreading malicious gossip and rumors about a hard working police surgeon long deceased.   You often say it's easy to kick a man when he's down ie JB.  Even easier when a man is 6' foot under!  Silly old goat.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #611 on: June 06, 2018, 09:52:01 AM »
And Lookout, you silly ... ...., I thought you said you don't blindly follow others?  Instead you claim to be your own person capable of forming your own opinions.  Why would you repeat something told by Gladys without any evidence to back it up?  Locals spreading gossip and rumors isn't evidence of anything silly ... .....
« Last Edit: June 07, 2018, 08:28:07 AM by Angelo222 »
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline puglove

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #612 on: June 06, 2018, 10:32:34 AM »
And Lookout, you silly ... ...., I thought you said you don't blindly follow others?  Instead you claim to be your own person capable of forming your own opinions.  Why would you repeat something told by Gladys without any evidence to back it up?  Locals spreading gossip and rumors isn't evidence of anything silly ... .....

One's smelly and stubborn with dangly tits and a beard. The other's a goat!!


 8((()*/
« Last Edit: June 07, 2018, 08:28:59 AM by Angelo222 »
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline adam

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #613 on: June 07, 2018, 08:07:27 AM »
Lookout has said herself she's in her late 70's. She obviously wants to spend her final days saying 'Jeremy is innocent' based on her 'gut feeling'.  On a forum she knows she is fiercely protected on.

One or two posters will spend all day engaging with her in never ending conversations no one will read.

Sometimes she can be abusive towards a poster. When going into Bamber defence mode but unable to give an answer. But no where near as bad as David's goading.

Can't see a problem in letting her continue.   

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #614 on: June 07, 2018, 08:31:51 AM »
Lookout has said herself she's in her late 70's. She obviously wants to spend her final days saying 'Jeremy is innocent' based on her 'gut feeling'.  On a forum she knows she is fiercely protected on.

One or two posters will spend all day engaging with her in never ending conversations no one will read.

Sometimes she can be abusive towards a poster. When going into Bamber defence mode but unable to give an answer. But no where near as bad as David's goading.

Can't see a problem in letting her continue.

No wonder Jeremy Bamber wanted the Jeremy Bamber forum closed down but Tesko refused to comply.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!