Author Topic: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?  (Read 486285 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1245 on: April 28, 2020, 08:49:45 PM »
I didn’t mention perception but it’s interesting you did

Perception Is Not Reality
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-power-prime/201908/perception-is-not-reality

My perception is my reality.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1246 on: April 28, 2020, 09:20:38 PM »
That's your perception of him not mine.

Regardless I think all prisoners are vulnerable.

How many do you know?

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1247 on: April 29, 2020, 12:39:56 AM »
’Attention-seeker' has murder conviction quashed’
His solicitor,Mark Newby, said: "Ian is delighted to have his liberty today," but added that the case showed the continuing risk of "vulnerable people being pushed through the court process without the necessary safeguards in place".https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/jun/16/ian-lawless-murder-conviction-quashed

”the case showed the continuing risk of "vulnerable people being pushed through the court process without the necessary safeguards in place”

Some ‘safeguards’

Grimsby Town fan who was cleared of murder is banned from every football ground in country

 *&^^&

What utter nonsense
« Last Edit: April 29, 2020, 12:48:30 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1249 on: April 29, 2020, 07:53:23 AM »
I meant all of them. There may be more distant relatives too, but I don't know.

I'm sure at least some of them DO give him a second thought------every time he plans an appeal.

And that’s all they give him: a quick second thought while they roll their eyes in boredom 🙄
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1250 on: April 29, 2020, 09:16:23 AM »
And that’s all they give him: a quick second thought while they roll their eyes in boredom 🙄

Apprehension, I would think.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1251 on: April 29, 2020, 11:05:12 AM »
Has anyone else noticed how the Criminal Cases Review Commission don’t appear to have commented publicly on this

Don’t forget the Kevin Nunn case which Mark Newby referred to as a ‘disaster’

Supreme Court’s judgment in Nunn a “disaster” that reinforced difficulties getting exhibits, says Mark Newby
https://mobile.twitter.com/C4CrimAppeals/status/964528097327566848

”Lawyers for Bamber – whose case is currently the subject of a six-part ITV dramatisation – have found in archives a series of statements by senior officers and the police surgeon that they say contradict that claim. They say the documents were never seen by the trial jury, and suggest that Caffell appeared to have only one gunshot wound when the police entered the crime scene.

“Mark Newby, a solicitor advocate at Quality Solicitors Jordans, which represents Bamber, told the Guardian:

The jury only heard of the two shots, which was relied upon by the crown to support their case, but this wasn’t the whole picture. It represents yet another significant aspect to this case which supports Jeremy Bamber and undermines this conviction.”

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/11/jeremy-bamber-lawyers-say-new-evidence-undermines-conviction?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium=&utm_source=Twitter&__twitter_impression=true


Did the trial jury hear from the Vet, Anji and Virginia Greaves, Sue Ford etc ?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2020, 11:23:13 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1252 on: April 29, 2020, 11:09:59 AM »
How many do you know?

How many do think Lady Edwina Grosvenor 'knows' ? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1253 on: April 29, 2020, 11:15:35 AM »
How many do think Lady Edwina Grosvenor 'knows' ?

I have no idea but I'm not asking her, I asked you?

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1254 on: April 29, 2020, 12:29:41 PM »
Who was the ‘close friend’ that claimed to the Suns Kieron Saunders, the day after the Murders (8th Aug 1985), SC ’had been taking methadone, a heroin substitute’?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7143593/jeremy-bamber/

Maybe someone can post the front page of the Sun, which was published the day after the murders, on the forum

Who was Kieron Saunders source for the ’heroin’ comment and NB found ’near telephone’ with ’seven’ gun shot wounds?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2020, 01:19:52 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1255 on: April 29, 2020, 01:05:27 PM »
I'm no lawyer, but I think IF (and it's a massive IF), he was successful via the CCRC, he was have to face a retrial and Julie (I am sure) would be called.

Why do you think she was released as a witness from the appeal hearing?

Lord Justice Kay, Mr Justice Wright and Mr Justice Henriques gave permission for her to be called, but no application was made for her to do so.
After the lunchtime adjournment, and following submissions from lawyers for both parties, she was released as a witness.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2358021.stm
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1256 on: April 29, 2020, 01:20:08 PM »
Maybe someone can post the front page of the Sun, which was published the day after the murders, on the forum

Who was Kieron Saunders source for the ’heroin’ comment and NB found ’near telephone’ with ’seven’ gun shot wounds?

This wreaks of Bamber

His psychopathic gaslighting was used on the police from the start, ‘as a specialized form of lying and manipulation’
and it’s not stopped since - which is another crime in itself

“Our society is moving in the direction of permitting, reinforcing, and in some cases actually valuing some of the traits listed in the Psychopathy Checklist.” —Robert Hare
https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/communication-success/201810/7-characteristics-the-modern-psychopath
« Last Edit: April 29, 2020, 01:29:34 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Common sense

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1257 on: April 29, 2020, 01:32:01 PM »
Why do you think she was released as a witness from the appeal hearing?

Lord Justice Kay, Mr Justice Wright and Mr Justice Henriques gave permission for her to be called, but no application was made for her to do so.
After the lunchtime adjournment, and following submissions from lawyers for both parties, she was released as a witness.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2358021.stm

I think she was summonsed specifically to give evidence regarding her deal with the NOTW and her dealings with the bank.  The court was able to bat away these spurious points of the appeal on the evidence that had always existed so there was no need for her to give evidence.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1258 on: April 29, 2020, 02:35:35 PM »
I think she was summonsed specifically to give evidence regarding her deal with the NOTW and her dealings with the bank.  The court was able to bat away these spurious points of the appeal on the evidence that had always existed so there was no need for her to give evidence.

 8((()*/
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #1259 on: April 29, 2020, 08:32:14 PM »
My perception is my reality.

Jeremy Bamber
@Bambertweets
9h
Was Sheila Caffell accidentally shot by firearms officers training at the scene at #WhiteHouseFarm?
“The appearance suggested in the case of Sheila Caffell 'the wound' had been inflicted by her own hand.” PC995 Norman Wright
The #JeremyBamber case
https://jeremy-bamber.co.uk/single-gunshot-wound-to-sheila
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation