Author Topic: Australian Ch7 documentary claims new lead in search for missing Madeleine McCann.  (Read 58926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



Offline John

Amaral claimed on the programmme there was a 90% dna match to maddie....that is a lie...an out and out lie

The bit you're missing is that it could also match Sean and Amelie.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.


Offline Mr Gray

amaral and brown will have signed a disclaimer giving the programme makers exclusive editing rights....if they dont realise what this means more fool them

Offline John

A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

The bit you're missing is that it could also match Sean and Amelie.

there was no 90% match...that is a lie...and amaral didnt mention the twins

Offline Mr Gray

I wonder if the mccanns could sue amaral in australia

Offline John

there was no 90% match...that is a lie...and amaral didnt mention the twins

The match to the twins was pointed out. I think you must have missed that part what with all that buffering  8)-)))
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 05:48:42 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

stephen25000

  • Guest
I wonder if the mccanns could sue amaral in australia

Dream on.

Meanwhile, the McCann's have to pay up.

Otherwise, one way or the other, they will be in court.

Offline Mr Gray

I think you must have missed that part what with all that buffering  8)-)))

Ive watched it without the buffering....amaral claimed there was a 90% match to madeleines dna which is a lie...you have highlighted innaccuracies sos you should be fair. There was no 90% match...it isnt true...we ahve all seen the files. it was clarence i think who said iy could be the twins

Offline John

I see Carly has joined us.  I wonder what she thinks of Ch7 reporter Rahni Sadler?  For me it is the worst interview technique I've seen for a long time.  Her sickening smirking at Amaral was the epitome of unprofessionalism.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 05:48:09 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Dream on.

Meanwhile, the McCann's have to pay up.

Otherwise, one way or the other, they will be in court.

the legal fees Ive seen quoted are very low

Offline John

Ive watched it without the buffering....amaral claimed there was a 90% match to madeleines dna which is a lie...you have highlighted innaccuracies sos you should be fair. There was no 90% match...it isnt true...we ahve all seen the files. it was clarence i think who said iy could be the twins

That's because a 90% match could cover literally thousands of people, it isn't significant in itself.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

The programme was very good PR for the mccanns and very bad for amaral, brown and the pj