Australian Ch7 documentary claims new lead in search for missing Madeleine McCann.

[Robittybob1]

So far it is not on You Tube and not available to us in NZ.

[jassi]

The programme seems to have upset everyone except Dave Barclay. It gave the impression that it was interviewing the McCanns but used old footage. Pat Brown and Colin Sutton were misrepresented and Amaral denied speaking to them. What a waste of time.

They probably used old footage for him as well.

[Eleanor]

I don't like Pat Brown.

She isn't really dangerous, Rob.  She is too strident and over bearing, and tries to enforce her Opinions on The Common Masses, because she thinks that we have no powers of reasoning and logic.  Unfortunately for her, some of us do.

Oh, and she has no self awareness.  She simply doesn't see how she comes across.

[G-Unit]

She isn't really dangerous, Rob.  She is too strident and over bearing, and tries to enforce her Opinions on The Common Masses, because she thinks that we have no powers of reasoning and logic.  Unfortunately for her, some of us do.

Oh, and she has no self awareness.  She simply doesn't see how she comes across.

The same could be said of many others in this case. Some have used libel lawyers to silence anyone who disagrees with their opinions. Failing to realise how they come across seems common also.

[Mr Gray]

The same could be said of many others in this case. Some have used libel lawyers to silence anyone who disagrees with their opinions. Failing to realise how they come across seems common also.

You can't silence people for disagreeing with your opinions
Your statement exhibits pure bias

[Eleanor]

The same could be said of many others in this case. Some have used libel lawyers to silence anyone who disagrees with their opinions. Failing to realise how they come across seems common also.

The McCanns are the victims in this.  Some of the Libel must have been unbearable.  And there is a vast difference between Libel and Opinion.

[stephen25000]

You can't silence people for disagreeing with your opinions
Your statement exhibits pure bias

Well dave, your bias is visible in virtually every post you make.

[Eleanor]

Okay, the pair of you.  Cut this out NOW.  And I don't care who started it.  You are as bad as each other.

[ferryman]

The same could be said of many others in this case. Some have used libel lawyers to silence anyone who disagrees with their opinions. Failing to realise how they come across seems common also.

Used libel laws to silence ['dissenters'], so-called.

Libel laws should be there to protect the reputations of innocent people falsely accused.

In Portugal, it appears clear they are not.

That is an indelible stain of disgrace on so-called Portuguese 'justice'.

[Mr Gray]

The McCanns are the victims in this.  Some of the Libel must have been unbearable.  And there is a vast difference between Libel and Opinion.

Precisely
Posters are confusing opinion with defamation

[G-Unit]

Precisely
Posters are confusing opinion with defamation

Posters are forgetting that defamation is an opinion unless and until it's tested in court. The McCanns learned that lesson on the one occasion when their complaints were legally examined.

[Mr Gray]

Posters are forgetting that defamation is an opinion unless and until it's tested in court. The McCanns learned that lesson on the one occasion when their complaints were legally examined.

Amaral defamed the McCanns in Portugal
If you think he didn't then that is more bias
Posts are removed from here for being libellous and don't need to be tested in court
Your posts are just opinion based on bias

[Alice Purjorick]

Amaral defamed the McCanns in Portugal
If you think he didn't then that is more bias
Posts are removed from here for being libellous and don't need to be tested in court
Your posts are just opinion based on bias

Not according to the Appeal Court and Supreme Court apparently.

[Eleanor]

Not according to the Appeal Court and Supreme Court apparently.

The Supreme Court of Portugal, which is fast becoming a farce imo.

[stephen25000]

Amaral defamed the McCanns in Portugal
If you think he didn't then that is more bias
Posts are removed from here for being libellous and don't need to be tested in court
Your posts are just opinion based on bias

Evidently, you don't comprehend the Supreme Court Judgement, and the fact that the legal action is over in Portugal.