Author Topic: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine  (Read 82021 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #255 on: May 05, 2017, 10:30:56 AM »
Thanks Carana

Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #256 on: May 05, 2017, 11:12:50 AM »
65 pages of discussion here  http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7884.0

So there is.
Now will someone point to where there is anything remoteley resembling reality charting or similar?
Except perhaps a signpost to it in post #1  8(>((
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #257 on: May 05, 2017, 11:19:57 AM »
So there is.
Now will someone point to where there is anything remoteley resembling reality charting or similar?
Except perhaps a signpost to it in post #1  8(>((
You should be able to do that in your sleep.  I've noticed how intellectual you are.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #258 on: May 05, 2017, 11:32:19 AM »
You should be able to do that in your sleep.  I've noticed how intellectual you are.

I have done it as far as it can go and posted it at least three times.
It does not meet with approval except from one possibly two others. It does meet with a lot of jeering and sneering from the usual suspects which then tells us all we need to know.... ?{)(**
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline John

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #259 on: May 05, 2017, 11:36:11 AM »
It's quite simple
The evidence tells us what didn't happen and abduction is virtually proved by default

The evidence?  Do you mean the non existent evidence that any stranger abduction occurred and that other evidence which points to woke wandered and met with an accident?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #260 on: May 05, 2017, 12:34:20 PM »
Pointing to various people who have said 'the parents are not suspects' or 'the parents are innocent' is somewhat naive in my opinion. No policeman with any sense will tell who they suspect because that warns them. In this particular case there are people whose mission is to prevent anything being aired in the media or on blogs which casts aspersions on the McCanns. There was unusual interaction with the press, as Richard Bilton has disclosed.

I was offered a deal by supporters of the McCanns. If I spied on the press pack, and passed on any stories I heard about the first suspect, Robert Murat, I’d be given leads from inside the camp. I declined.....

I have received warning letters from their lawyers, Carter Ruck. But I have never seen anything that makes me doubt their innocence.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/family/bbc-panoramas-richard-bilton-supporters-mccanns-asked-act-spy/

The Carter Ruck letters explain why almost every commentator mentions the 'innocence' of the parents. I thought only editors were threatened, but it seems individual reporters were too.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #261 on: May 05, 2017, 01:06:08 PM »
I have done it as far as it can go and posted it at least three times.
It does not meet with approval except from one possibly two others. It does meet with a lot of jeering and sneering from the usual suspects which then tells us all we need to know.... ?{)(**
Is that a post on the forum somewhere sometime?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #262 on: May 05, 2017, 04:53:11 PM »
Pointing to various people who have said 'the parents are not suspects' or 'the parents are innocent' is somewhat naive in my opinion. No policeman with any sense will tell who they suspect because that warns them. In this particular case there are people whose mission is to prevent anything being aired in the media or on blogs which casts aspersions on the McCanns. There was unusual interaction with the press, as Richard Bilton has disclosed.

I was offered a deal by supporters of the McCanns. If I spied on the press pack, and passed on any stories I heard about the first suspect, Robert Murat, I’d be given leads from inside the camp. I declined.....

I have received warning letters from their lawyers, Carter Ruck. But I have never seen anything that makes me doubt their innocence.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/family/bbc-panoramas-richard-bilton-supporters-mccanns-asked-act-spy/

The Carter Ruck letters explain why almost every commentator mentions the 'innocence' of the parents. I thought only editors were threatened, but it seems individual reporters were too.
I think it's bonkers to believe that Richard Bilton was threatened by Carter Ruck to ensure that his views on the parents' innocence are repeated every time he mentions them. 

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #263 on: May 05, 2017, 04:58:51 PM »
Your post does seem more than a little biased
SY are far from stupid
One of the points on my Luz tours is designed to show how lacking in intelligence OG was.

The point of relevance would not interest them, as they have already fingertip-searched the area, to rule out 38 'anomalies'.

By the way, both of my last guests have expressed astonishment as to how large that site is, so it hasn't come over in the media the way it does on the ground.

I have completed Luz Tour 6.  Luz Tour 5 will be going up on my blog soon.
What's up, old man?

Online Eleanor

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #264 on: May 05, 2017, 05:11:59 PM »
I have watched both of them now, and pretty much much of a muchness I would say.  Not biased at all.

Some things were said that I didn't like, but then some things were said that I did.

Honestly, what more can one wish for?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #265 on: May 05, 2017, 05:12:54 PM »
One of the points on my Luz tours is designed to show how lacking in intelligence OG was.

The point of relevance would not interest them, as they have already fingertip-searched the area, to rule out 38 'anomalies'.

By the way, both of my last guests have expressed astonishment as to how large that site is, so it hasn't come over in the media the way it does on the ground.

I have completed Luz Tour 6.  Luz Tour 5 will be going up on my blog soon.

You may think OG was lacking in intelligence but others will find that says more about you than Grange

Offline G-Unit

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #266 on: May 05, 2017, 05:50:33 PM »
I think it's bonkers to believe that Richard Bilton was threatened by Carter Ruck to ensure that his views on the parents' innocence are repeated every time he mentions them.

It does seem unbelievable, I agree. It happened though, he has received warning letters from Carter Ruck. What on earth could they be warning him about? I'm sure it wasn't what you have said, that's ridiculous.

Mentioning the McCann's innocence is probably an attempt to stay in their good books. The letters were more likely to be about something he said that they didn't like. I wonder what it was?

No wonder everyone was nervous when Mark Williams-Thomas was on TV recently. The McCanns seem to have succeeded in making everyone in the media paranoid in case they upset them.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #267 on: May 05, 2017, 05:54:19 PM »
It does seem unbelievable, I agree. It happened though, he has received warning letters from Carter Ruck. What on earth could they be warning him about? I'm sure it wasn't what you have said, that's ridiculous.

Mentioning the McCann's innocence is probably an attempt to stay in their good books. The letters were more likely to be about something he said that they didn't like. I wonder what it was?

No wonder everyone was nervous when Mark Williams-Thomas was on TV recently. The McCanns seem to have succeeded in making everyone in the media paranoid in case they upset them.
Genuine question:  did it ever occur to you that Richard Bilton actually does wholeheartedly believe the parents to be completely innocent,  or is that beyond the realms of possibility in your view?

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #268 on: May 05, 2017, 06:01:59 PM »
Is that a post on the forum somewhere sometime?
Alice is simply playing games - he asks you to speculate on how an abduction could have taken place and then when you give a perfectly plausible and logical explanation for abduction he complains that you're speculating.  He really should grow up IMO.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Sky Documentary - Searching For Madeleine
« Reply #269 on: May 05, 2017, 06:03:17 PM »
You may think OG was lacking in intelligence but others will find that says more about you than Grange
IYO.

Which IYO is meaningless.

 *&*%£

It will be interesting to see if the moderators class your post as an ad hom, given that it is about me as a person, is derogatory, and is fact-free.
What's up, old man?