What Happened To Madeleine McCann? - by Ian Horrocks.

[faithlilly]

I posted the cite already on a post which starts FAO Faithlilly.  You asked for an example, I gave you an example.  Now you are demanding another example because you've shifted the goalposts.  Please stop playing games.  I have no idea what cases Horrocks has worked on during his many years with the Met, nor do I see what point you are trying to make.  Have children been specifically targeted in abduction cases?  Yes.  Is Horrocks theory plausible and logical?  Yes.

We are told that Horrocks's theory carries more weight because he is an experienced professional yet neither he nor you can provide an example of a similar case he has worked on. That is the bottom line.

[Alfie]

We are told that Horrocks's theory carries more weight because he is an experienced professional yet neither he nor you can provide an example of a similar case he has worked on. That is the bottom line.

I haven't claimed it.  If you check back you will see that I have said that his theory could have been written by A. Nonymouse and it would still be completely plausible and logical.   And THAT is the bottom line.

[Alfie]

How many times do you need to type your support for Horrocks ?

I think we know that already.

Dear oh dear.  I couldn't give a tuppeny toss about Horrocks, I'm certainly not interested in supporting him, whatever that means.  It's his theory which interests me and which is I posted his blog post, why is that so difficult to grasp?

[stephen25000]

Dear oh dear.  I couldn't give a tuppeny toss about Horrocks, I'm certainly not interested in supporting him, whatever that means.  It's his theory which interests me and which is I posted his blog post, why is that so difficult to grasp?

We already know. 

[G-Unit]

Dear oh dear.  I couldn't give a tuppeny toss about Horrocks, I'm certainly not interested in supporting him, whatever that means.  It's his theory which interests me and which is I posted his blog post, why is that so difficult to grasp?

Unfortunately his theory has been unable to withstand scrutiny as there are assumptions, mistakes and unanswered questions imo.

[Alfie]

Unfortunately his theory has been unable to withstand scrutiny as there are assumptions, mistakes and unanswered questions imo.

In your opinion.  In my opinion it makes perfect plausible and logical sense.  If you've read a better one feel free to PM me a link.  You won't because you can't.

[Robittybob1]

In your opinion.  In my opinion it makes perfect plausible and logical sense.  If you've read a better one feel free to PM me a link.  You won't because you can't.

CC me too please.

[G-Unit]

In your opinion.  In my opinion it makes perfect plausible and logical sense.

Well, we are quite different. I examine the facts, and if people make inaccurate claims that puts me off.  His 20 minute window of opportunity just isn't there, for example. Journalists make such careless mistakes, policemen shouldn't.

[Alfie]

Well, we are quite different. I examine the facts, and if people make inaccurate claims that puts me off.  His 20 minute window of opportunity just isn't there, for example. Journalists make such careless mistakes, policemen shouldn't.

How many minutes between Gerry's check at 9ish and the next check?

[Robittybob1]

How many minutes between Gerry's check at 9ish and the next check?

It would depend if you include the time he talked to Jez as part of that check.

[Alfie]

It would depend if you include the time he talked to Jez as part of that check.

No I don't include that time.  If an abductor removed Madeleine shortly after Gerry had left the apartment he wouldn't have known that Gerry was still in the vicinity and would have assumed he'd gone straight back to the table.

[Robittybob1]

Mo I don't include that time.  If an abductor removed Madeleine shortly after Gerry had left the apartment he wouldn't have known that Gerry was still in the vicinity and would have assumed he'd gone straight back to the table.

So in your theory you don't have abductor team lookouts.  If they are operating just via the kids bedroom window they would be oblivious of what Gerry was doing.  I think Gerry should have come away from the apartment on edge, he should have been wondering how did that kid's bedroom door move.  He should have  backtracked and popped back in unannounced.
It all comes back to the question as to whether the front door was able to be opened without a key?

[faithlilly]

Mo I don't include that time.  If an abductor removed Madeleine shortly after Gerry had left the apartment he wouldn't have known that Gerry was still in the vicinity and would have assumed he'd gone straight back to the table.

We are told Gerry has rather a loud Glaswegian voice. I such a quiet street the alleged abductor couldn't have helped but hear Gerry talking in the street.

[Alfie]

We are told Gerry has rather a loud Glaswegian voice. I such a quiet street the alleged abductor couldn't have helped but hear Gerry talking in the street.

Was there a baby asleep in a pushchair?  Maybe he was whispering...

[faithlilly]

Was there a baby asleep in a pushchair?  Maybe he was whispering...

Neither he nor Jez mentioned whispering so I very much doubt it.