What Happened To Madeleine McCann? - by Ian Horrocks.

[stephen25000]

Bang-on right.

Apart from that I would add to the part emboldened, misunderstanding AND LIES!

Oh, surprise.

[Robittybob1]

There are many reasons and substances to which a cadaver dog can alert but with a properly trained scent dog you usually get what you asked for.

Well I'll upgrade my analysis then "There is only one solution in my opinion - Tracker dogs suggest she wandered
Cadaver dog suggests many reasons and substances, including a dead body may have been in the apartment.
Solution: If there was a body the dead body was not Madeleine.  Madeleine was abducted from the road.

[Robittybob1]

There is a major difference between involvement and potential cover-up.

Like I said Alfie, without an abduction, where does that leave the McCann's, and they have claimed abduction from virtually the start.

I will await your answer.

The only logical theory is an abduction after MM woke and wandered. 

[stephen25000]

The only logical theory is an abduction after MM woke and wandered.

Try explaining your rationale.

[Robittybob1]

Very easy really.

If there was no abduction, where does it leave the McCann's ?

Is that a hypothetical question?

[Robittybob1]

You can do it from both, but he was talking about the front door.

So the front door could be opened from the inside could it?  Or was it deadlocked and the key removed? 

[Robittybob1]

As I have said before Alfie, bar a confession, assuming a crime was committed, we will probably never know the truth.

No - we are going to work it out.

[Robittybob1]

Cadaver dog alerted in the apartment unknown as to how the scent got there.

That's fair enough.

[ShiningInLuz]

So the front door could be opened from the inside could it?  Or was it deadlocked and the key removed?

May I ask if this has anything to do with the price of chips?

He was talking about the front door.

Ask Mr Horrocks whether he thought the front door was deadlocked.  I neither know nor care about Mr Horrocks opinion on this point.

[Robittybob1]

I have considered that Brie but the big difference is that if she was abducted from the apartment she was carried.  In those circumstances scent is not transferred directly to the ground which would be the case with a barefooted child. A child walking will lay a trail which can be easily followed.  The scent from a carried child will tend to dissipate and especially so if it is windy.

We can't rule out a RTA, it is still a very valid possibility.

What was RTA standing for please?

[Alfie]

What was RTA standing for please?

road traffic accident

[Robittybob1]

Try explaining your rationale.

It is the only logical theory I have heard so far.  Alfie has been asking for other logical theories and there have been none so far.

[stephen25000]

It is the only logical theory I have heard so far.  Alfie has been asking for other logical theories and there have been none so far.

That is a matter of opinion.

You seem to have forgotten the absence of evidence in this case, which can point to one scenario above another.

[Robittybob1]

May I ask if this has anything to do with the price of chips?

He was talking about the front door.

Ask Mr Horrocks whether he thought the front door was deadlocked.  I neither know nor care about Mr Horrocks opinion on this point.

You told me he was talking about the front door.  Well when you said either door.  But I am questioning if it was possible to exit by the front door without knowing where the key was.

You were right SIL " If two people were involved, Madeleine could have been handed out of the window to the second person. If one, he could possibly have climbed out the window with her, but I believe it to be more likely that they left via the door leading to the car park. Although entry was gained via the patio doors, I do not believe this was the exit route as it is not only unnecessary and illogical, it would also substantially increase the chances of being seen." 

Still unproven that the door could be opened from inside without the key.

[Robittybob1]

That is a matter of opinion.

You seem to have forgotten the absence of evidence in this case, which can point to one scenario above another.

All others fail on a logical analysis.