Such as?
4 more people arguidoed. 4 more now told that they are no longer persons of interest.
I don't know the precise requirement for making someone an arguido. Nor do I know who approves such a request.
But Panorama door-stepped one of the 4 in central Luz, and in a short clip, it is possible to evaluate his personality.
Would I trust that man to keep it secret for 10 years if he was in any way involved in or had any knowledge of Madeleine's disappearance? Absolutely not.
Would I trust that man to keep it secret for 10 years if he was in any way involved in or had any knowledge of burglaries in Luz? Absolutely not.
He appears to have been arguidoed because he was he was resident in Luz and had a mobile phone.
On that basis most of the T7 should have been arguidoed, and the McCanns should have been arguidoed. The T9 were in Luz, were several hundreds of metres closer to the incident, and most were using a mobile.
Unless the McCanns had special privileges, I can see no reason to believe they would have been exempt under new rules. It is a requirement on anyone claiming this or asserting the interviews were rushed in to avoid such changes to provide supporting evidence for such. Without this, it is mere propaganda.
The source that provides the real order to events is Kate's book 'madeleine'. Intended date of departure announced. PJ fit the interviews into that schedule. McCanns leave on announced date.
That the interviews were rushed through to avoid a change in the law is a myth, and accordingly it should be quashed.
That the McCanns 'fled' Portugal because of being made arguidos is a myth, and accordingly it should be quashed.
