Well Brietta, if they don't say abduction, they cop the blame.
That is straightforward logic.
Don't you think it may be in Madeleine's best interests if she has been abducted that the theory that she has been is given the prominence devoted to it by the current investigators of the Policia Judiciaria and Scotland Yard?
You and with all due respect to his years of experience although none with anything to do with Madeleine's case, Colin Sutton appear to be throwbacks to past failure.
I think Mr Sutton is exemplifying precisely the flawed tunnel vision of the Amaral investigation which couldn't see beyond Madeleine's parents to a wider picture rather than anything reflecting what is today happening on the ground. Although to give him his due he would have understood the significance of DNA evidence as returned from the laboratory to the investigation.
Perhaps when he goes into the case in some depth he will revise what he has to say.