CMTV Gonçalo Amaral - O Enigma - with English subtitles

[pathfinder73]

 


Can you remind me of the date when that statement was made.

7 July 2008

"The case is listed to be heard in open court on July 7 in the Family Division of the High Court in London, and is expected to be contested by Leicestershire Police, according to legal sources."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2164743/Madeleine-McCann-parents-court-bid-for-information.html

[Erngath]

7 July 2008

"The case is listed to be heard in open court on July 7 in the Family Division of the High Court in London, and is expected to be contested by Leicestershire Police, according to legal sources."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2164743/Madeleine-McCann-parents-court-bid-for-information.html

Almost nine years ago.
Guess OG. know a little bit more now.

[stephen25000]

Almost nine years ago.
Guess OG. know a little bit more now.

Really.

So they have solved how Madeleine disappeared, and her fate ?

[G-Unit]

The McCanns got the truth loud and clear from UK police in court when they wanted their files (July 2008).

‘While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’ (LP)

Kate McCann's response the this has always interested me. Rather than mentioning anything which could eliminate them, she refers to how he had seen how grief-stricken they were shortly after the disappearance.  Does she really think that being grief-stricken is evidence?

[pathfinder73]

Almost nine years ago.
Guess OG. know a little bit more now.

If eliminating dead end leads is what you call progress then that's up for debate but if they know more then expect new developments and changes in this case. I'm still waiting.

[Erngath]

Really.

So they have solved how Madeleine disappeared, and her fate ?

No sadly they have not but they do seem to have eliminated her parents from any involvement in her disappearance.....................await the standard reply.

[G-Unit]

Almost nine years ago.
Guess OG. know a little bit more now.

I think your guess is questionable. According to A C Rowley they did not investigate parental involvement they assumed the first investigation had done that. So in that respect the situation remains the same as it was in July 2008.

[misty]

No sadly they have not but they do seem to have eliminated her parents from any involvement in her disappearance.....................await the standard reply.

Stephen, like others, has no evidence that the current police investigators have no evidence of abduction.

[Erngath]

If eliminating dead end leads is what you call progress then that's up for debate but if they know more then expect new developments and changes in this case. I'm still waiting.

But they do not seem to suspect Madeleine's parents of being involved in her disappearance

[Mr Gray]

I think your guess is questionable. According to A C Rowley they did not investigate parental involvement they assumed the first investigation had done that. So in that respect the situation remains the same as it was in July 2008.

either you did not understand what rowley said or you are deliberately repeating untruths. rowley assumed nothing. they looked at the original evidence and felt that the issue of the mccanns had been dealt with and agreed with the findings

[Erngath]

I think your guess is questionable. According to A C Rowley they did not investigate parental involvement they assumed the first investigation had done that. So in that respect the situation remains the same as it was in July 2008.

No I "guess" they know a little more than  in July 2008.

[stephen25000]

Stephen, like others, has no evidence that the current police investigators have no evidence of abduction.

We already know, as  fact, no evidence has been found to show a third party in the apartment that night.

Forensic tests  have ceased.

There are no marks either in the apartment to show any other person was there, other than known parties.

Partial and unidentifiable fingerprints, and hair samples exist, but it doesn't mean they were made or left there that night.

It is clear that SY have not determined the method by which Madeleine disappeared from the apartment, and likewise her fate.

[Mr Gray]

We already know, as  fact, no evidence has been found to show a third party in the apartment that night.

Forensic tests  have ceased.

There are no marks either in the apartment to show any other person was there, other than known parties.

Partial and unidentifiable fingerprints, and hair samples exist, but it doesn't mean they were made or left there that night.

It is clear that SY have not determined the method by which Madeleine disappeared from the apartment, and likewise her fate.

hair samples and partial prints have not been ruled out

[Erngath]

We already know, as  fact, no evidence has been found to show a third party in the apartment that night.

Forensic tests  have ceased.

There are no marks either in the apartment to show any other person was there, other than known parties.

Partial and unidentifiable fingerprints, and hair samples exist, but it doesn't mean they were made or left there that night.

It is clear that SY have not determined the method by which Madeleine disappeared from the apartment, and likewise her fate.

But they have determined that her parents played no part in her disappearance.

[stephen25000]

hair samples and partial prints have not been ruled out

As I said, what evidence is there they were left that night ?

NONE.