CMTV Gonçalo Amaral - O Enigma - with English subtitles

[ferryman]

The way the law works is that evidence of incrimination needs to be found and there is no real evidence of incrimination
There is lots of evidence that the McCanns are not involved

Together with lots of evidence that material from the files has been distorted, misrepresented and misconstrued, not least (but far from exclusively) by the chap who first coordinated the investigation.

What's his name? ......

[ferryman]

Nor have you found any evidence that implicates The Mccanns

 ... but SY, who are not sharing the findings of their investigations and are working with Porto PJ, say

"Neither her parents or any of the member (sic) of the group that were with her are either persons of interest or suspects."

That is the latest announcement AFTER the investigations ... yours were BEFORE the investigations.

Before the archiving dispatch, yes.

[ShiningInLuz]

Nor have you found any evidence that implicates The Mccanns

 ... but SY, who are not sharing the findings of their investigations and are working with Porto PJ, say

"Neither her parents or any of the member (sic) of the group that were with her are either persons of interest or suspects."

That is the latest announcement AFTER the investigations ... yours were BEFORE the investigations.

True, just based on a flawed remit based on an incorrect assumption.

[Mr Gray]

True, just based on a flawed remit based on an incorrect assumption.

I'm astonished that you criticise so much yet say nothing about Amaral churning out misinformation presented as fact

[Eleanor]

Everyone is entitled to an opinion.  They are also entitled to a polite response should there be one.

[John]

Everyone is entitled to an opinion.  They are also entitled to a polite response should there be one.

Absolutely agree, civility and respect cost nothing.

[stephen25000]

Nor have you found any evidence that implicates The Mccanns

 ... but SY, who are not sharing the findings of their investigations and are working with Porto PJ, say

"Neither her parents or any of the member (sic) of the group that were with her are either persons of interest or suspects."

That is the latest announcement AFTER the investigations ... yours were BEFORE the investigations.

Nor has any abductor been proven to exist, forensically or otherwise.

[Mr Gray]

Not has any abductor been proven to exist, forensically or otherwise.

Depends what you mean by prove
It has several levels

[stephen25000]

Together with lots of evidence that material from the files has been distorted, misrepresented and misconstrued, not least (but far from exclusively) by the chap who first coordinated the investigation.

What's his name? ......

I.Y.O.

[stephen25000]

Depends what you mean by prove
It has several levels

So, other than opinions, let's have some evidence to show an abductor(s) existed in this case.

[misty]

So, other than opinions, let's have some evidence to show an abductor(s) existed in this case.

Perhaps you would provide some evidence that an abductor didn't exist.

[stephen25000]

Perhaps you would provide some evidence that an abductor didn't exist.

Is that comment for real ?

[G-Unit]

Nor have you found any evidence that implicates The Mccanns

 ... but SY, who are not sharing the findings of their investigations and are working with Porto PJ, say

"Neither her parents or any of the member (sic) of the group that were with her are either persons of interest or suspects."

That is the latest announcement AFTER the investigations ... yours were BEFORE the investigations.

The interesting question is why "Neither her parents or any of the member (sic) of the group that were with her are either persons of interest or suspects."

Is it because the first investigation eliminated them? Not according to the Supreme Court judges.

Is it because OG investigated them and eliminated them? Not in my opinion, based on what has been said.

Is it because they started with one word; abduction? Yes, it's in their remit and it has been confirmed elsewhere.

[ShiningInLuz]

I'm astonished that you criticise so much yet say nothing about Amaral churning out misinformation presented as fact

Do I say nothing?  Have you been reading this thread?   

[ShiningInLuz]

As none of us have seen the evidence contained in Jim Gamble's scoping report your assertion that the remit was flawed is an incorrect assumption.

The Sky documentary savaged this concept.

To date, I have seen repeated requests on this forum for evidence that the McCanns or the rest of the T9 were investigated.

To date, I have seen not one iota of credible evidence that this happened.

To date, I have seen AC Rowley say that OG relied on the findings of the original investigation to rule out the parents.

To date, I have seen the SC of Portugal rule that the original investigation did not rule out the parents.