Was Mark Rowley wrong to claim that Madeleine McCann was abducted?

[Mr Gray]

most non biased people understand that dont they??

perhaps it is you and those who agree with you who is biased.

[Mr Gray]

there is no evidence of a abduction    not even the police know where maddie is or  what really happned to her

could you say...no evidence of abduction...in your opinion

redwood seemed to think so...

[ferryman]

What I hear him say is "however she left that apartment she's been abducted".   However she left the apartment - that is the full range of ways of getting out of the apartment, walked out back door or front door, dragged out or carried out.

Just before 2 minutes in.
However she left the apartment she's been abducted

(Mark Rowley).

[stephen25000]

As a reminder, none of the three hypotheses have been proved or disproved.

Stating any as a fact on this forum, as Admin said yesterday.


I have been asked to intervene here so I will.  Any poster claiming, abduction, murder, infanticide, accidental death or any other theory relating to Madeleine McCann's disappearance as a FACT will be sanctioned accordingly with a ban.  I cannot make it any clearer than that.  It is unknown what happened to Madeleine at this juncture so please be guided by this warning.

Admin

[carlymichelle]

stephen i  wasnt  stating anything as fact   just letting you know

[stephen25000]

As a reminder, none of the three hypotheses have been proved or disproved.

Stating any as a fact on this forum, as Admin said yesterday.


I have been asked to intervene here so I will.  Any poster claiming, abduction, murder, infanticide, accidental death or any other theory relating to Madeleine McCann's disappearance as a FACT will be sanctioned accordingly with a ban.  I cannot make it any clearer than that.  It is unknown what happened to Madeleine at this juncture so please be guided by this warning.

Admin

So as a reminder, Rowley was expressing his opinion, as has Amaral.

NOTHING MORE.

[stephen25000]

stephen i  wasnt  stating anything as fact   just letting you know

No worries Carly.

[ferryman]

So as a reminder, Rowley was expressing his opinion, as has Amaral.

NOTHING MORE.

Some opinions are nuanced and balanced, based on experience professional judgement and real expertise.

Other ('opinions') are nasty, vindictive, driven by malice, and even avarice. 

[stephen25000]

Some opinions are nuanced and balanced, based on experience professional judgement and real expertise.

Other ('opinions') are nasty, vindictive, driven by malice, and even avarice.

i.e. If they reflect your viewpoint good, if not, bad.

Have you read Orwell's pastiche of the Russian Revolution ?


Meanwhile, would you care to make a COMPLETE LIST of people or organizations who have money from this case ?

[G-Unit]

Some opinions are nuanced and balanced, based on experience professional judgement and real expertise.

Other ('opinions') are nasty, vindictive, driven by malice, and even avarice.

In your opinion. Other opinions are available.

[stephen25000]

Money?

This is a quest to establish the truth of what happened to a missing little girl.

That is what Amaral was trying to do, before he was removed from the case.

Now ferryman, can you provide a list of those who have money from the case, as you mentioned avarice.

[barrier]

Just before 2 minutes in.
However she left the apartment she's been abducted

(Mark Rowley).

Which clearly contradicts what he said at 30 secs in regarding not having definitive evidence.

[ferryman]

Which clearly contradicts what he said at 30 secs in regarding not having definitive evidence.

No it doesn't.

[barrier]

No it doesn't.

What does it do then,no definitive evidence,to abducted some 90 secs later in the same interview.

Question and answer to and from Rowley.

Q: You’ve described it as a ‘unique’ case. Why is it unique?
MR: I think it’s unique in two or three respects. First of all the way its captured attention in different
countries is quite unusual. You’ll get a very high-profile case in a particular country, the way it has
captured interest across countries, I think is significant. The length of it. And it’s unusual to have a
case like this where you’re doing a missing persons investigation, where ten years on, we still don’t
have definitive evidence about exactly what’s happened. And that’s why we’re open minded, even if
we have to be pessimistic about the prospects, we are open minded because we don’t have definitive
evidence about what happened to Madeleine.

[stephen25000]

What does it do then,no definitive evidence,to abducted some 90 secs later in the same interview.

An extremely valid point.

Rowley's statement was full of contradictions.