Was it Tuesday or Wednesday night?

[stephen25000]

And the evidence used to make them studios shown to be baseless
Source...the archiving report

They would be suspects in the UK davel.

Madeleine has disappeared without a trace. That remains the situation.

Investigation of the parents would be and is standard practice.

[stephen25000]

I'm not trying to make a difference
I'm making a point
No post on here makes any difference

There is no onus on anyone to believe you Davel, over anyone else.

[Mr Gray]

They would be suspects in the UK davel.

Madeleine has disappeared without a trace. That remains the situation.

Investigation of the parents would be and is standard practice.

They certainly would have been suspects initially
The point is that the evidence used to make them suspects was shown to be baseless

[Brietta]

They would be suspects in the UK davel.

Madeleine has disappeared without a trace. That remains the situation.

Investigation of the parents would be and is standard practice.

That appears to be contradicted by the fact that they are not suspects as far as the present active investigation is concerned.

[Mr Gray]

There is no onus on anyone to believe you Davel, over anyone else.

I don't care what anyone here thinks it's not important

[stephen25000]

There is no onus on anyone to believe you Davel, over anyone else.

Yet no one else has been identified to having been in the apartment on that evening, that aren't already known about.

The case remains unsolved.

[Mr Gray]

Yet no one else has been identified to having been in the apartment on that evening, that aren't already known about.

The case remains unsolved.

So admirals claim that he can prove maddie died in the apartment is false

[G-Unit]

Gun it is implying she knows what I think
On that topic I know and she doesnt

You told me what you think, I didn't need to imply. You posted your opinions as facts (again);

Amaral doesn't understand the evidence in the files and if I can't see that then I don't understand the evidence in the files

[stephen25000]

Amaral claims the dog's alert was to cadaver odour
That is not a fact
It therefore shows he does not understand the evidence
If you do not realise that then you do not understand the evidence

We already know the alerts weren't corroborated.

Amaral has his theories, just like other people.

The case remains unsolved.

[Mr Gray]

We already know the alerts weren't corroborated.

Amaral has his theories, just like other people.

The case remains unsolved.

Can you not see the point
Amaral is claiming as a fact that the alert was to cadaver
It is not a fact
He is wrong to claim.It as a fact
I'm surprised you cannot grasp something which is so simple

[misty]

Amaral claims the dog's alert was to cadaver odour
That is not a fact
It therefore shows he does not understand the evidence
If you do not realise that then you do not understand the evidence

Amaral claimed that not only did the dog alert to cadaver odour but that it was Madeleine's cadaver odour as no-one else was shown to have died in apartment 5A in the past. That was a serious flaw in his thesis, simply because there may have been an unreported death in the vicinity (including next door as the odour can penetrate concrete).

In the case of Bella Bond (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bella_Bond_murder_case) no-one in authority was even aware that the little girl was missing, let alone dead. Had her remains not been discovered & a facial reconstruction undertaken, the authorities would never have discovered that a cadaver alert in a refrigerator actually did pertain to a dead child, about whom they had no prior knowledge.

[Mr Gray]

Amaral claimed that not only did the dog alert to cadaver odour but that it was Madeleine's cadaver odour as no-one else was shown to have died in apartment 5A in the past. That was a serious flaw in his thesis, simply because there may have been an unreported death in the vicinity (including next door as the odour can penetrate concrete).

In the case of Bella Bond (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bella_Bond_murder_case) no-one in authority was even aware that the little girl was missing, let alone dead. Had her remains not been discovered & a facial reconstruction undertaken, the authorities would never have discovered that a cadaver alert in a refrigerator actually did pertain to a dead child, about whom they had no prior knowledge.

So
Amaral.misunderstood the evidence

[G-Unit]

Does it really matter? he is long gone from the investigation, he successfully defended his right in the courts to write his theory.His theory is no more or less ridiculous that the one where SY officers seriously try to have us believe that there was a burglary gone wrong,in the process Madeleine was half inched out of the apartment leaving not a trace,then these 4 amigos waited patiently around Luz until some one caught on.Laudable in the extreme.Still I'd venture a guess that it will be all over soon,Cressida Dick the other day that other inquiries were being shelved to focus on terrorism, a crime on a foreign soil commited some 10 yrs ago can't be a priority some how.

There are certain words which can trigger certain responses. 'Amaral' is one of those words. He's relevant to the thread only because he mentions something being written about the checking of the children. His account differs from Kate's as he places the writing on Tuesday 1st.

[Brietta]

There are certain words which can trigger certain responses. 'Amaral' is one of those words. He's relevant to the thread only because he mentions something being written about the checking of the children. His account differs from Kate's as he places the writing on Tuesday 1st.

Amaral is relevant to every thread concerning Madeleine McCann's case.

[Robittybob1]

There are certain words which can trigger certain responses. 'Amaral' is one of those words. He's relevant to the thread only because he mentions something being written about the checking of the children. His account differs from Kate's as he places the writing on Tuesday 1st.

Did you explain why you think "he places the writing on Tuesday 1st"?