Is absence of evidence.... evidence of innocence

[Mr Gray]

Bad advice as has dogged them throughout this case IMO.

i think that was good advice

[Mr Gray]

What did she have to fear ?

after 10 years do you still not understand....see johns post ...i think its 88

[stephen25000]

after 10 years do you still not understand....see johns post ...i think its 88

I understand why she didn't want to answer the questions.

Try not to tell me again what to think.

That is goading.

[Alice Purjorick]

because she had been advised not to answer any questions...simple

let me explain...imo...by now the pj were simply trying to wear kate down. If she had answerred these there would ahve been 48 more...the only way to put a stop to the pjs tactic was the right to silence

Why do you suppose that would be so?

[Mr Gray]

Why do you suppose that would be so?

I think you know

[Mr Gray]

Well I read number 88 .

Can you explain it's relevance to the latter part of the thread ?

if you need me too although its quite simple...

john posted..
In my own case the facts were manipulated and twisted by a rogue prosecutor.

bu answerring questions the suspect gives answers that can be twisted and manipulated...and used as evidence against the suspect

[stephen25000]

if you need me too although its quite simple...

john posted..
In my own case the facts were manipulated and twisted by a rogue prosecutor.

bu answerring questions the suspect gives answers that can be twisted and manipulated...and used as evidence against the suspect

Not in this case.

She refused to answer the questions, bar one, and that said everything.

IMHO , of course.

[Mr Gray]

Not in this case.

She refused to answer the questions, bar one, and that said everything.

IMHO , of course.

Yes in this case
Some of the questions included lies about the forensic evidence

It is obvious to see
When taking into account John's post
Exactly why she refused to answer

[stephen25000]

Yes in this case
Some of the questions included lies about the forensic evidence

It is obvious to see
When taking into account John's post
Exactly why she refused to answer

I'm not talking about John's case.

She answered one question.

Her answer said everything I need to know.

[Mr Gray]

I'm not talking about John's case.

She answered one question.

Her answer said everything I need to know.

I didn't mention John's case
Read the post again

Anyone who knows anything about how the police operate would understand exactly why Kate was advised not to answer questions
And it certainly isn't the reason you gave

[stephen25000]

I didn't mention John's case
Read the post again

Anyone who knows anything about how the police operate would understand exactly why Kate was advised not to answer questions
And it certainly isn't the reason you gave

I gave my opinion.

Unless you are Kate Mccann, you gave yours, and do not know what she was thinking.

[Mr Gray]

I gave my opinion.

Unless you are Kate Mccann, you gave yours, and do not know what she was thinking.

I know why a lawyer would give that advice
And why it is the correct advice in this situation
Kate was absolutely right to do what she did

[stephen25000]

I know why a lawyer would give that advice
And why it is the correct advice in this situation
Kate was absolutely right to do what she did

IYO yet again.

[Mr Gray]

IYO yet again.

No not my opinion
Probably in the opinion of just about every criminal lawyer
I've done some research

[stephen25000]

No not my opinion
Probably in the opinion of just about every criminal lawyer
I've done some research

So you agree with me.

Good.