Author Topic: Is the British government protecting the McCanns and if so for what reason.  (Read 15919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
It is known that abduction involving the removal of a child from her bedroom through a window ... while her whole family are at home ... without the abductor entering to leave forensic trace evidence ... is not only possible in theory, it has happened.
In the case which I have already posted some time ago, I think the screen on the window had been removed.
Does that imply a 'staged' abduction?

it doesn't mean there was an abduction here.

So yet again Brietta, if there was no abduction, where does that leave the McCann's ?

Offline Erngath

Is that the most original response you can come up with.

As it happens , I do know police officers, and they have been a useful source of information as to investigative procedures.

Yes we all know you know police officers.
Well I have nephew in law who is a senior detective in Police Scotland who does find your musing most hilarious.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Yes we all know you know police officers.
Well I have nephew in law who is a senior detective in Police Scotland who does find your musing most hilarious.

Well, I knew that as well.

You've said that before. 8((()*/

Offline Erngath

Well, I knew that as well.

You've said that before. 8((()*/



Indeed I have.
Probably after each time you tell your little story about your helpful police friends. 8**8:/:
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Brietta

Which screen on which window?

Man, 37, charged with 'kidnapping' girl, 3, through her bedroom window... but child was miraculously saved when her father and uncle chased down her abductor

Ethan Odom, 37, 'reached through window and told girl to come to him'

He then fled with her down street in Santa Clarita, California, police said

However, the girl's father and uncle heard a commotion and gave chase

They 'caught up with suspect, tackled him to ground and got child back'

Odom charged with kidnapping and other crimes; has denied all counts

Bail has been set at $285,000 and he could face up to 13 years in prison

By Sophie Jane Evans For Dailymail.com
PUBLISHED: 14:38, 13 January 2015 | UPDATED: 15:10, 13 January 2015

Snip
In the second alleged attack, at around 7pm last Thursday, Odom -  who was 'wearing a hoodie', family members said - allegedly pulled a screen off the girl's bedroom window and leaned in.

'He leaned in the window and then told her to come toward him,' the youngster's aunt, Adriana, told KTLA 5, adding that her entire family had been in the house during the 'frightening' attack.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2908283/Man-37-charged-kidnapping-girl-3-bedroom-window-child-miraculously-saved-father-uncle-chased-abductor.html#ixzz4pokY025V
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

stephen25000

  • Guest


Indeed I have.
Probably after each time you tell your little story about your helpful police friends. 8**8:/:

That really annoys you, doesn't it.

Tough.

That many police officers don't believe the McCann's version of events, and also police officers and ex members of the force, contributed to Amaral's fund.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Man, 37, charged with 'kidnapping' girl, 3, through her bedroom window... but child was miraculously saved when her father and uncle chased down her abductor

Ethan Odom, 37, 'reached through window and told girl to come to him'

He then fled with her down street in Santa Clarita, California, police said

However, the girl's father and uncle heard a commotion and gave chase

They 'caught up with suspect, tackled him to ground and got child back'

Odom charged with kidnapping and other crimes; has denied all counts

Bail has been set at $285,000 and he could face up to 13 years in prison

By Sophie Jane Evans For Dailymail.com
PUBLISHED: 14:38, 13 January 2015 | UPDATED: 15:10, 13 January 2015

Snip
In the second alleged attack, at around 7pm last Thursday, Odom -  who was 'wearing a hoodie', family members said - allegedly pulled a screen off the girl's bedroom window and leaned in.

'He leaned in the window and then told her to come toward him,' the youngster's aunt, Adriana, told KTLA 5, adding that her entire family had been in the house during the 'frightening' attack.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2908283/Man-37-charged-kidnapping-girl-3-bedroom-window-child-miraculously-saved-father-uncle-chased-abductor.html#ixzz4pokY025V
Thank you.

I thought you were talking directly re the Madeleine case rather than a similar case.

Merci bien.
What's up, old man?

Offline Brietta

Just a reminder( to myself especially)  the topic of the thread is ...

Is the British government protecting the McCanns and if so for what reason. 
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Erngath

That really annoys you, doesn't it.

Tough.

That many police officers don't believe the McCann's version of events, and also police officers and ex members of the force, contributed to Amaral's fund.

All of your post is your opinion only.
Please provide cites for the fact that"many police officers don't believe the McCanns version of events"

Why are you allowed to post your opinion as fact?
And show me absolute proof  that " ex members of the police force contributed to Amarals  fund.

Your post shoul be removed.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

That really annoys you, doesn't it.

Tough.

That many police officers don't believe the McCann's version of events, and also police officers and ex members of the force, contributed to Amaral's fund.

It's a fact that some police officers are of limited intelligence

Offline G-Unit

Just a reminder( to myself especially)  the topic of the thread is ...

Is the British government protecting the McCanns and if so for what reason.

The British government's response to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was unprecedented.

Why did the British Ambassador travel from Lisbon on 4th May? No such response occurred in the Ben Needham case;

The British Embassy was informed and was asked to help. However no support was offered due to us not being under arrest for any crime and the Embassy's feeling that the local police had better knowledge and so it should be best to leave it to them.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/help-find-ben-needham/timeline-of-events-since-ben-needhams-disappearance/140138162720690/
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline ShiningInLuz

It's a fact that some police officers are of limited intelligence
A cite for this 'fact' should be easy.
What's up, old man?

stephen25000

  • Guest
All of your post is your opinion only.
Please provide cites for the fact that"many police officers don't believe the McCanns version of events"

Why are you allowed to post your opinion as fact?
And show me absolute proof  that " ex members of the police force contributed to Amarals  fund.

Your post shoul be removed.

What a surprise that you typed that.

Perhaps then, we should have all reference to abduction removed as well, as there is no proof of that. 8)--))

Offline Benice

Just a reminder( to myself especially)  the topic of the thread is ...

Is the British government protecting the McCanns and if so for what reason.

As far as I am concerned it's the usual stance of many sceptics when they desperately want something to be true, but can't come up with any credible evidence to support their wishful thinking.

i.e

When all else fails - claim a conspiracy.

IMO
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Erngath

What a surprise that you typed that.

Perhaps then, we should have all reference to abduction removed as well, as there is no proof of that. 8)--))


We supporters have to provide cites .
You seem to be excused this rule.
As a mod you should be setting the correct example.
Your post is stating your opinion only unless you can provide a cite.
Your post is clearly breaking the rules.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.