Kate; "The thing is, Sandra, it was a passing remark. Madeleine just said 'where were you when Sean and I cried?'"
[Just? Said? The word is 'asked' and it was a question, not a remark]
Kate; "And we thought" [Answering a question is the usual response, not thinking. Kate knew the answer; she wasn't there to hear them crying.]
Kate; "Was that kind of maybe when they were getting a bath?" [Kate knows the answer t that, she bathed them]
Kate; "Or maybe sometimes at that time of night when they're a bit tired they cry a little bit" [Why would Madeleine ask the question if it was when Kate was with her?]
Kate; "So I thought well we were checking so regularly" [Every 30 minutes with a longer gap when they went into the bar]
Kate; "That I thought 'Well, if she's woken up obviously she's fallen back asleep very quickly" [How long is very quickly, and why isn't Sean part of the discussion here?]
Kate then tells us that never in a million years would you think she woke up because someone tried to take her out of the bedroom. I agree, you wouldn't think that, you would think that your children had woken up and cried and you weren't there to see to them.
Kate "I said to her 'What do you mean Madeleine, when was this?' [What did she mean? It's clear enough to me what she meant. A time check by a 3 year old is asking a lot imo]
Kate; "And she dropped it, she started playing with something it was just a passing remark"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqQ1-rUuTxMIt was a question that was answered with another question, not a passing remark. There was enough information there for most parents to understand that their children had been awake and crying despite their regular checks. The McCann's response? Nothing. No change. Carry on as before. Maybe the children did cry, but they quickly fell asleep again, so that's OK.