Goncalo Amaral's life still on hold according to reports?

[Brietta]

I think you will find he has always been quiet, and as yet we don,t know if the accusations are baseless, do we.

I think you are mistaken on that ... in my opinion he became quite the television pundit promoting his view of Madeleine's case.

[Mr Gray]

R
I think you will find he has always been quiet, and as yet we don,t know if the accusations are baseless, do we.

Yes we do know, IMO they are baseless.... He has explained his reazo ing and the flawed evidence it is based on

[kizzy]

He wasn't very quiet when he was appearing on Television every other day, and saying all sorts of dreadful things, without any proof.

He was stating what he believed, about a dreadful case, that should never have happened.

That is, its not what G A should have done, its what the mccanns should have.

[Eleanor]

He was stating what he believed, about a dreadful case, that should never have happened.

That is, its not what G A should have done, its what the mccanns should have.

You have to admit that he wasn't very quiet.  So One wonders why he is now.

[Mr Gray]

He was stating what he believed, about a dreadful case, that should never have happened.

That is, its not what G A should have done, its what the mccanns should have.

It's, about time he realised that his understaing of the evidence was flawed..... There is no proof maddie, died in the apartment as he claimed

[Brietta]

He was stating what he believed, about a dreadful case, that should never have happened.

That is, its not what G A should have done, its what the mccanns should have.

In my opinion he made the case more dreadful than it needed to be ... it is worth remembering he got the sack from it ... he may claim it was because of MI5 or whoever, my opinion is that he just wasn't up to the job.
So worth thinking about, before blaming the victims as he has been doing for far too many years.

[kizzy]

In my opinion he made the case more dreadful than it needed to be ... it is worth remembering he got the sack from it ... he may claim it was because of MI5 or whoever, my opinion is that he just wasn't up to the job.
So worth thinking about, before blaming the victims as he has been doing for far too many years.

Not only him Brietta, you remember that.

[faithlilly]

You have to admit that he wasn't very quiet.  So One wonders why he is now.

Perhaps because he won the case ?

[Eleanor]

Perhaps because he won the case ?

So why hasn't he got the money.  Mind you, he does have other debts.  Perhaps they are queuing up.  Now there's a thought.

[faithlilly]

So why hasn't he got the money.  Mind you, he does have other debts.  Perhaps they are queuing up.  Now there's a thought.

How do we know he has got the money ? Because some poster on another forum, who may or may not want to stir up bad feeling against the McCanns, says so ?

[Mr Gray]

It's all quite odd. He hasn't received  his money so if there, are other claims meaning his money is not released he has no claim against the mccanns... It will be interesting to see exactly what's going on

[faithlilly]

It's all quite odd. He hasn't received  his money so if there, are other claims meaning his money is not released he has no claim against the mccanns... It will be interesting to see exactly what's going on

I fear your obvious glee will not be rewarded.

[Mr Gray]

Yes we do know, IMO they are baseless.... He has explained his reazo ing and the flawed evidence it is based on

As slarti has edited my post perhaps slarti can explain  on what evidence amaral based his theory

[Carana]

I think you will find he has always been quiet, and as yet we don,t know if the accusations are baseless, do we.

You mean aside from his book, "documentary", numerous appearances on TV matinée shows and his column in the CdM?

[kizzy]

As slarti has edited my post perhaps slarti can explain  on what evidence amaral based his theory

G A was involved. and what he knew, decided to write a book.

That is not banned.