« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 38   Go Down

Author Topic: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?  (Read 70963 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #15 on: February 03, 2018, 02:22:08 PM »
It may be worth visiting this thread again in the light of Miss O'Doherty's revelation.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7062.0
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline jassi

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #16 on: February 03, 2018, 04:14:25 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on February 03, 2018, 01:58:29 PM









Thank you for that - an interesting read.

Response seems muted today.  Is there a footie match ?
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline misty

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #17 on: February 03, 2018, 05:05:07 PM »
It doesn't really matter if MS hasn't changed his mind about the sighting possibly being Gerry. Smithman remains formally unidentified and therefore indicates that there is a potential abductor still at large. However, I don't think SY have been treating the sighting as a critical line of inquiry.


DCI Redwood Crimewatch Oct 2013
24 20

"This could be the man that took Madeleine, but very importantly, there could be an innocent explanation. The efits are clear, and I’d ask the public to look very carefully at them. If they know who this person is, please come forward."
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #18 on: February 03, 2018, 05:16:34 PM »
Quote from: misty on February 03, 2018, 05:05:07 PM
It doesn't really matter if MS hasn't changed his mind about the sighting possibly being Gerry. Smithman remains formally unidentified and therefore indicates that there is a potential abductor still at large. However, I don't think SY have been treating the sighting as a critical line of inquiry.


DCI Redwood Crimewatch Oct 2013
24 20

"This could be the man that took Madeleine, but very importantly, there could be an innocent explanation. The efits are clear, and I’d ask the public to look very carefully at them. If they know who this person is, please come forward."

Is this all she has come up with..... Of no importance whatsoever
Logged

Offline Eleanor

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #19 on: February 03, 2018, 05:18:57 PM »
Quote from: Davel on February 03, 2018, 05:16:34 PM
Is this all she has come up with..... Of no importance whatsoever

I have to say that I am somewhat disappointed.  This is a bit pathetic.
Logged

Offline Erngath

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #20 on: February 03, 2018, 05:33:20 PM »
It does seem to be a molehill when a mountain was anticipated by some.
Busy day and in response to Jassi, yes and Rugby and now preparing dinner for friends.
Logged
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2018, 05:36:55 PM »
Quote from: jassi on February 03, 2018, 04:14:25 PM

Thank you for that - an interesting read.

Response seems muted today. Is there a footie match ?

Awaiting the latest songsheet from The Brill Building I shouldn't wonder ?{)(**

As for footy The Toffees play as we speak.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2018, 05:39:44 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on February 03, 2018, 05:36:55 PM
Awaiting the latest songsheet from The Brill Building I shouldn't wonder ?{)(**

As for footy The Toffees play as we speak.

We may have just had it.
Logged
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline barrier

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2018, 05:40:05 PM »
Quote from: Davel on February 03, 2018, 05:16:34 PM
Is this all she has come up with..... Of no importance whatsoever

Much the same as SY,for a fraction of the cost.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline jassi

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #24 on: February 03, 2018, 05:45:15 PM »
Pity she didn't show a response from Bilton
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline misty

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2018, 05:50:06 PM »
Quote from: jassi on February 03, 2018, 05:45:15 PM
Pity she didn't show a response from Bilton

Yet, as was pointed out a long time ago, MS never appeared to ask for a correction from the Sunday Times who published the same retraction of opinion as the BBC.
Logged

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #26 on: February 03, 2018, 05:55:17 PM »
Quote from: slartibartfast on February 03, 2018, 05:39:44 PM
We may have just had it.

Was that it?
Jeez they do need help. It is a shame the transfer window is now closed* I'd have offered my services for only twice my normal fee...........

*How droll is that?
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline jassi

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #27 on: February 03, 2018, 06:01:45 PM »
Quote from: misty on February 03, 2018, 05:50:06 PM
Yet, as was pointed out a long time ago, MS never appeared to ask for a correction from the Sunday Times who published the same retraction of opinion as the BBC.

Could be the the Smith family wish to keep their heads down and ignore the whole sorry saga as much as possible.
They know what they've said and no amount of twisting will alter that.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2018, 06:06:40 PM by jassi »
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline misty

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #28 on: February 03, 2018, 06:06:07 PM »
Quote from: jassi on February 03, 2018, 06:01:45 PM
Could be the the Smith family wish to keep their heads down and ignore the whole sorry saga as much as possible.

Of course. That explains why they spoke to Gemma O'Doherty recently - according to what she wrote; they also apparently confirmed that Mary Smith did address Smithman in passing. No direct quotes, though.
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why Were We Lied to By the BBC ?
« Reply #29 on: February 03, 2018, 06:06:24 PM »
Quote from: misty on February 03, 2018, 05:50:06 PM
Yet, as was pointed out a long time ago, MS never appeared to ask for a correction from the Sunday Times who published the same retraction of opinion as the BBC.

The pertinent point being 'a long time ago'. As of this morning we know that MS did ask the BBC for a retraction and they obliged.

I do wonder if as well as asking MS and his wife to help in the construction of efits Oakley interviewed them as well. Perhaps that is the reason the the PI's report was withheld ?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 38   Go Up
« previous next »