Author Topic: The Smithman e-fits  (Read 104905 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #210 on: February 20, 2018, 11:35:20 AM »
or was it a fact that they are similar?

I would say that if there is a difference of opinion it is opinion.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #211 on: February 20, 2018, 11:41:40 AM »
I would say that if there is a difference of opinion it is opinion.

I would say sometimes there is a very fine line between opinion and fact... An e fit could be so like an individual  it is no longer opinion but fact
« Last Edit: February 20, 2018, 11:46:18 AM by Davel »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #212 on: February 20, 2018, 11:58:25 AM »
I would say that if there is a difference of opinion it is opinion.
This discussion to some might seem pointless but to me it has been educational, and it has made me wonder if the statements with are based on perceptions of events, people, times and places are not opinions too.  No two people remember seeing the same thing.  When there are differences you "would say that if there is a difference of opinion it is opinion".
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #213 on: February 20, 2018, 12:00:16 PM »
or was it a fact that they are similar?

Similarity, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. One person says 'Those photos look very similar to me' another person says 'Those photos don't look very similar to me'. They are giving their opinions.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #214 on: February 20, 2018, 12:11:00 PM »



Are they the same person fact or opinion?
If in your opinion you thought there were similar you would in fact be correct as I chose two pics of Cristavao.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #215 on: February 20, 2018, 12:13:57 PM »
Similarity, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. One person says 'Those photos look very similar to me' another person says 'Those photos don't look very similar to me'. They are giving their opinions.

Facial recognition software..

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #216 on: February 20, 2018, 12:32:23 PM »
This discussion to some might seem pointless but to me it has been educational, and it has made me wonder if the statements with are based on perceptions of events, people, times and places are not opinions too.  No two people remember seeing the same thing.  When there are differences you "would say that if there is a difference of opinion it is opinion".

It's all opinion unless it can be verified. Opinions on calls to the GNR abounded, but the fact was that the first call was at 10.41 pm. 
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #217 on: February 20, 2018, 12:47:36 PM »
If in your opinion you thought there were similar you would in fact be correct as I chose two pics of Cristavao.

You were in possession of the facts. Others who didn't know the facts were giving their opinions.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #218 on: February 20, 2018, 12:50:22 PM »
Facial recognition software..

What about it?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #219 on: February 20, 2018, 01:00:22 PM »
What about it?
Takes the guesswork  out of identifying a face

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #220 on: February 20, 2018, 01:21:06 PM »
It's all opinion unless it can be verified. Opinions on calls to the GNR abounded, but the fact was that the first call was at 10.41 pm.

Correction. The first call to the GNR was shown as 10.41pm on a spreadsheet produced for the files, which may or may not be correct.
(I understand that the GNR also has a mobile contact number but don't know if it was in service in 2007)

Offline sadie

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #221 on: February 20, 2018, 01:49:34 PM »
That is what you always say yet Robert Murat was amazed how alike Angus was to him.
That's rubbish IMO Rob.  As if he didn't know Angus ... a cousin ... but several removed, both in Estate Agency work and more or less the same age in the same village.

Angus was a get out of trouble person IMO.  Please do not interpret that as meaning that Robert had done any wrong, but he certainly would not like the Worlds media following him.

Offline sadie

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #222 on: February 20, 2018, 02:02:29 PM »
That's rubbish IMO Rob.  As if he didn't know Angus ... a cousin ... but several removed, both in Estate Agency work and more or less the same age in the same village.

Angus was a get out of trouble person IMO.  Please do not interpret that as meaning that Robert had done any wrong, but he certainly would not like the Worlds media following him.
Robert was a young man and IMO his most striking feature was his premature forehead frown marks.   He has at least one youngish relative that also has premature forehead frown marks. 
I am not mentioning any names but this relative was the height of 5' 7" ish that I have seen mentioned.  I think that tallies with the height given by some of the people who claim they saw Robert Murat near OC on the night of May 3rd.   

Murat is taller than that, probably nearly 6 feet tall as judged from photos and videos of him by his Mums villas gates. 

Also from the photos of him with the PJ assembled near OC.  He was the same sort of height as the Officers and they are not usually short in stature, are they ?


AIMO

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #223 on: February 20, 2018, 06:30:01 PM »
You were in possession of the facts. Others who didn't know the facts were giving their opinions.
What I found I was still relying on someone else for the facts, and did they have their facts correct.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #224 on: February 20, 2018, 06:32:02 PM »
Correction. The first call to the GNR was shown as 10.41pm on a spreadsheet produced for the files, which may or may not be correct.
(I understand that the GNR also has a mobile contact number but don't know if it was in service in 2007)

The list of calls was provided by Portugal Telecom to Judge Dos Santos Frías in response to a request from him. Are you casting aspersions on them or the judge?
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CALLS_TO_GNR.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0