The Smithman e-fits

[faithlilly]

In my opinion only a very foolish policeman would publicly name a suspect and warn them.

Indeed.

[Angelo222]

I don't take that, as, fact... What about the Portuguese... Have they been ordered not to investigate the mccanns... I don't think so

We don't know what the current PJ investigators really think.

[Mr Gray]

In my opinion only a very foolish policeman would publicly name a suspect and warn them.

I think you are in denial if you believe the mccanns are suspects in either investigation... It's not just the statement by both police forces but all the rest of the information... The facts... That we know

[Angelo222]

The, archiving dispatch stated that none of the evidence used to make the mccanns, arguidos could be consolidated... That's.. None... They also stated there, was NO evidence... That's NO.... Evidence of any crime by the arguidos... All this is in the files, and can be cited


There is, no cite for... Not enough evidence.. In the, archiving report... It does not say that

Kate, was quite right to stop cooperating with the pj because for reasons discussed many times

An inability to find sufficient evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

[G-Unit]

That's because the investigation isn't wide enough.  A senior Met officer has already stated publicly that investigators do not have a free hand in who to investigate.

A C Rowley had difficulties with this in my opinion. Although he thinks they understand all the evidence he seems to have unearthed only one fact (in bold). How the investigation verified that fact he doesn't explain. It seems to be a case of 'trust me, I'm a policeman'.


there is still a lot of unknown on this case.

Until we get to the point where we have solved it, we’re unlikely to have definitive evidence as to exactly what happened at the time

However she left that apartment, she has been abducted.

http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf


Being unclear as what is your opinion of what was actually said in the transcript I have edited out the bracketed sections.
If you are quoting you must clearly differentiate between quote and your opinion.

[Mr Gray]

An inability to find sufficient evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist.l

The archiving report said.. NO... evidence

The lack of evidence is another  indication the mccanns, are not involved.

[Mr Gray]

A C Rowley had difficulties with this in my opinion. Although he thinks they understand all the evidence he seems to have unearthed only one fact (in bold). How the investigation verified that fact he doesn't explain. It seems to be a case of 'trust me, I'm a policeman'.

So we’ve achieved complete understanding of it all, [the evidence]

there is no definitive evidence [whether Madeleine is alive or not]

there is still a lot of unknown on this case.

Until we get to the point where we have solved it, we’re unlikely to have definitive evidence as to exactly what happened at the time

However she left that apartment, she has been abducted.

http://findmadeleine.com/pdf/ac-rowley-transcript.pdf

Makes perfect sense to me... They do not know, exactly  what happened  to maddie but they are happy the parents, are not involved

[Mr Gray]

An inability to find sufficient evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Do you believe in the Loch Ness Monster... The Yeti... God... All those things people believe exist but there is not sufficient  evidence for.. I don't believe in any of them

[Robittybob1]

Do you believe in the Loch Ness Monster... The Yeti... God... All those things people believe exist but there is not sufficient  evidence for.. I don't believe in any of them

There are photographs of the Loch Ness Monster!  I've seen them.

[Eleanor]

We don't know what the current PJ investigators really think.

Good, innit.

[Mr Gray]

We don't know what the current PJ investigators really think.

We know what they have told us... That is an undeniable  fact... And that was, what was under discussion.  If you want to believe the mccanns, are, still suspects that's up to you... Doesn't really matter

[slartibartfast]

No the sighting of the girl thought to be MM in NZ was confirmed by DNA analysis not to be Madeleine McCann.

And the one in Morocco and the one in Belgium.

[Mr Gray]

And the one in Morocco and the one in Belgium.

Yet when MS says he thinks he saw, Gerry many take it as a fact

[jassi]

And the one in Morocco and the one in Belgium.

Indeed, in my opinion not one of these sightings  proved to be anything other than the product of an over-active imagination.

[sadie]

And the one in Morocco and the one in Belgium.

Cites please for the DNA evidence in the Rif Mountains of Morocco and Molenbeek St John in Brussels. 


Both major centres for CANNabis production btw. and connected to each other by that ... and by the population of Molenbeek St John having a large proportion of Rif Mountain Morroccan people living there.

Cites please slarti