Author Topic: The Smithman e-fits  (Read 104894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #645 on: March 03, 2018, 10:04:02 AM »
What Poor Girl?

Madeleine Beth McCann whose fait as we talk has yet to be determined after getting untoward 11 yrs and multi millions,all the last update that Grange could give was that its still not been determined whether she is dead or alive,that one.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #646 on: March 03, 2018, 10:05:43 AM »

Have you forgot about her completely - maddie

I haven't.  Her name is Madeleine McCann.  You were the one who said, "Madeleine Who."

Please stop suggesting that the likes of me don't care.  It is insulting.

Offline barrier

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #647 on: March 03, 2018, 10:06:58 AM »
I haven't.  Her name is Madeleine McCann.  You were the one who said, "Madeleine Who."

Please stop suggesting that the likes of me don't care.  It is insulting.

It was I who said Madeleine who,not kizzy.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #648 on: March 03, 2018, 10:10:15 AM »
It was I who said Madeleine who,not kizzy.

Snort.  Sorry about that.  I sometimes don't pay attention to who says the nastier of things.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #649 on: March 03, 2018, 10:22:49 AM »
There is a misconception  amongst sceptics that supporters care about the McCann's and not Maddie... It's patently false... The fact is as long as the misguided conception of parental involvement us taking the blame away from where it lies... The abductor... So support for justice fir madddie depends in support for the innocence of her parents.. IMO... Thank God both investigating police forces understand  this

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #650 on: March 03, 2018, 10:36:37 AM »
There is a misconception  amongst sceptics that supporters care about the McCann's and not Maddie... It's patently false... The fact is as long as the misguided conception of parental involvement us taking the blame away from where it lies... The abductor... So support for justice fir madddie depends in support for the innocence of her parents.. IMO... Thank God both investigating police forces understand  this

We all care about Madeleine.  I have never believed otherwise.  Why some Members here should find it necessary to dispute this fact is completely beyond me.

Offline kizzy

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #651 on: March 03, 2018, 10:40:35 AM »
Snort.  Sorry about that.  I sometimes don't pay attention to who says the nastier of things.

Well you should, your a mod.

Apology accepted anyway.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #652 on: March 03, 2018, 10:43:12 AM »
Well you should, your a mod.

Apology accepted anyway.

Thank You.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #653 on: March 03, 2018, 11:25:21 AM »
They can afford the worlds best Criminal lawyers and have influence at the highest levels, I am thinking  .... but who knows for certain?

What i am almost 100% certian of, is that the Mccanns have no criminal involvement of any type in Madeleines present position.   Seems that SY agrees with me on this.   

The Mccanns made a simple mistake, which they will sadly regret for the rest of their lives, imo.



The mccanns had the best lawyers - money could buy.

Of course the mccanns had involvement -  they left their children alone,

It wasn't a simple mistake, they were abandoned - not able to look after themselves.

As we know maddie could freely walk round that apartment - knowing she was alone and unprotected.

Left to all the dangers in the dark - you cannot call that a simple mistake.

this simple mistake caused maddie -  god knows unnecessary suffering.

It was tragic the minute they closed that door -  and walked away from there children.

Their decision , their responsibility.

What ever SY  say, there is none - there is no evidence of abduction,

Apart from only -  the word of the mccanns.

Very factual
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline kizzy

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #654 on: March 03, 2018, 11:25:35 AM »
There is a misconception  amongst sceptics that supporters care about the McCann's and not Maddie... It's patently false... The fact is as long as the misguided conception of parental involvement us taking the blame away from where it lies... The abductor... So support for justice fir madddie depends in support for the innocence of her parents.. IMO... Thank God both investigating police forces understand  this



The main point is though - you as yet don't know there was an abductor. no proof for your thinking except you believe the mccanns - that's not proof.

So why do you say it as fact, you don't know what is going on either, with both investigating forces.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #655 on: March 03, 2018, 11:28:53 AM »
There is a misconception  amongst sceptics that supporters care about the McCann's and not Maddie... It's patently false... The fact is as long as the misguided conception of parental involvement us taking the blame away from where it lies... The abductor... So support for justice fir madddie depends in support for the innocence of her parents.. IMO... Thank God both investigating police forces understand  this

It’s not a misconception, it is a perception. Justice for Madeleine and support for the parents are not dependent on each other.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Erngath

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #656 on: March 03, 2018, 11:48:03 AM »
There is a misconception  amongst sceptics that supporters care about the McCann's and not Maddie... It's patently false... The fact is as long as the misguided conception of parental involvement us taking the blame away from where it lies... The abductor... So support for justice fir madddie depends in support for the innocence of her parents.. IMO... Thank God both investigating police forces understand  this

Well said.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline kizzy

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #657 on: March 03, 2018, 12:03:38 PM »
The McCann children were Not Abandoned.  Even the Portuguese Judiciary conceded that.

No more Libel on that score, if you please.

How is it lible

three under age children left on there own - with no - adult supervision.


abandon
əˈband(ə)n/Submit
verb
1.
cease to support or look after (someone); desert.
"her natural mother had abandoned her at an early age"
synonyms:   desert, leave, leave high and dry, turn one's back on, cast aside, break (up) with;




Offline sadie

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #658 on: March 03, 2018, 01:08:22 PM »
Madeleine who?
Oh, now you surprise me.  I thought that you knew who this forum was about.  8(>((

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #659 on: March 03, 2018, 01:14:14 PM »
It’s not a misconception, it is a perception. Justice for Madeleine and support for the parents are not dependent on each other.

It is a misconception.... I care deeply about Maddie ...the perception that I don't is, a misconception...