Author Topic: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?  (Read 43457 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Alternatively, they are trying to pull the proverbial wool over...
Literally how much detail have they given us about any aspect of the investigation?  And what about the PJ?  Why aren't you berating them for not revealing what they've been doing for the last god knows how many years?
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 04:57:24 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Not in the public interest, I would say.

As Tannerman is not in the frame,Totman's movements require no explanation - IMO

Tannerman could very well be in the frame for all we know.

Offline Brietta

Not in the public interest, I would say.

As Tannerman is not in the frame,Totman's movements require no explanation - IMO

I'm not sure whether or not Tannerman is still in the frame.  It remains that the man Jane saw was walking in the opposite direction from the homeward route Dr Totman could have been expected to walk.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

There is only one description of a direction of travel,that is from JT,Redwood merely said in the exact same area.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Hasn't one of our forum members raised an FOI about the direction of Totman travel? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

There is only one description of a direction of travel,that is from JT,Redwood merely said in the exact same area.

Not the same at all, at all.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 05:47:21 PM by Eleanor »

Offline Brietta

There is only one description of a direction of travel,that is from JT,Redwood merely said in the exact same area.

Clever, don't you think?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

Hasn't one of our forum members raised an FOI about the direction of Totman travel?

Seen it mentioned elsewhere.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

I'm not sure whether or not Tannerman is still in the frame.  It remains that the man Jane saw was walking in the opposite direction from the homeward route Dr Totman could have been expected to walk.

Was tannerman ever in a frame or is it wishful thinking on some parts he was.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Was tannerman ever in a frame or is it wishful thinking on some parts he was.

Can you think of any good reason why he should not have been?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline John

" Genuine concerns and questions" from whom?

Anyone interested in the Madeleine McCann case. SY are creating a bubble in the case and we all know what happens when that bubble bursts.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Erngath

Anyone interested in the Madeleine McCann case. SY are creating a bubble in the case and we all know what happens when that bubble bursts.

Why would they respond to questions and concerns from posters on internet forms ?
As far as I can guage most folk show little interest in the investigation.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline John

Literally how much detail have they given us about any aspect of the investigation?  And what about the PJ?  Why aren't you berating them for not revealing what they've been doing for the last god knows how many years?

If the PJ had been doing any investigating we would have heard about it by now.  As for SY, I think their only involvement now is dreaming up some way to explain how they could spend nearly £12 million on a missing child case and still come up empty.  No leads, no suspects, no arrests, no comment!
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline barrier

Can you think of any good reason why he should not have been?


Of course they could be looking for evidence that rules out an alleged abduction.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Anyone interested in the Madeleine McCann case. SY are creating a bubble in the case and we all know what happens when that bubble bursts.

The shit hits the fan?