Author Topic: It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?  (Read 43515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Why would they respond to questions and concerns from posters on internet forms ?
As far as I can guage most folk show little interest in the investigation.

That my dear chap is exactly what they are hoping for.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Erngath

That my dear chap is exactly what they are hoping for.


That's a first being called a chap!
I'm sure there will be enough freedom of information requests from a certain quarter to ensure they are held to account.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline barrier

If the PJ had been doing any investigating we would have heard about it by now.  As for SY, I think their only involvement now is dreaming up some way to explain how they could spend nearly £12 million on a missing child case and still come up empty.  No leads, no suspects, no arrests, no comment!

I've said before about an ending,if they come up with what I think,person/persons removed Madeleine from 5a with out leaving a trace of to her whereabouts that would hardly raise an high brow especially if hidden in on news like the day we finally have Brexit.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier


That's a first being called a chap!
I'm sure there will be enough freedom of information requests from a certain quarter to ensure they are held to account.


They don't have to answer them.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

If the PJ had been doing any investigating we would have heard about it by now.  As for SY, I think their only involvement now is dreaming up some way to explain how they could spend nearly £12 million on a missing child case and still come up empty.  No leads, no suspects, no arrests, no comment!
So are you of the opinion that the PJ are doing nothing at all?  Interesting way to conduct an investigation.  As for the rest of your comment - you have no idea what leads or what suspects they are pursuing so please don't pretend you do, kindly forgive my impertinence.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Why doesn't someone from the forum ring him up and get him to explain it?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

So are you of the opinion that the PJ are doing nothing at all?  Interesting way to conduct an investigation.  As for the rest of your comment - you have no idea what leads or what suspects they are pursuing so please don't pretend you do, kindly forgive my impertinence.

I think the PJ...who have primacy..have..and are doing nothing....they only reopened the investigation to facilitate SY...who are the real investigators in his case.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 07:21:50 PM by slartibartfast »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Why doesn't someone from the forum ring him up and get him to explain it?
Because it's none of our business for one.  For two, it's a bit creepy.  And three - once his  name was released he was probably inundated with crank calls and letters from "researchers" and "J4M campaigners" so let's not add to the possible harrassment shall we...?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I think the PJ...who have primacy..have..and are doing nothing....they only reopened the investigation to facilitate SY...who are the real investigators in his case.
Well that's an interesting take on it I suppose.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 07:22:18 PM by slartibartfast »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Because it's none of our business for one.  For two, it's a bit creepy.  And three - once his  name was released he was probably inundated with crank calls and letters from "researchers" and "J4M campaigners" so let's not add to the possible harrassment shall we...?
well it is my business, and we talk about him here.  It is our business.  Well some investigative journalist could do it on our behalf.
He is not on Facebook as Julian Totman.  Hang on something came up when I entered "Julian Tottman"
https://www.facebook.com/julian.totman.9
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 07:25:41 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

well it is my business, and we talk about him here.  It is our business.  Well some investigative journalist could do it on our behalf.
He is not on Facebook as Julian Totman.

could you explain why its your business..I dont see that it is

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I think the PJ...who have primacy..have..and are doing nothing....they only reopened the investigation to facilitate SY...who are the real investigators in his case.
I wonder why it was felt necessary to remove the first few words of your post?  They were hardly controversial or rule breaking.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

It is my business because I have dedicated 2 years now trying to solve the case.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6225547/madeleine-mccann-gp-sighting-waste/  has an article about Julian and a photo.  I'm surprised how much Julian looks like Gerry front on.  Could Julian be both Smithman and Tannerman?
Did he carry his daughter past LuzDoc as well?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta


Of course they could be looking for evidence that rules out an alleged abduction.

I'm not sure if the proper procedure is first to have an idea then try to fit the evidence to suit.  We've seen that doesn't work.  I think it would work out better if the evidence itself dictated and chose the path to follow and I think that is presently what is being done..
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

It is my business because I have dedicated 2 years now trying to solve the case.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6225547/madeleine-mccann-gp-sighting-waste/  has an article about Julian and a photo.  I'm surprised how much Julian looks like Gerry front on.  Could Julian be both Smithman and Tannerman?
Did he carry his daughter past LuzDoc as well?
its none of your business.....imo you have wasted 2 years...leave it to SY who have the skills and all the information