It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?

[slartibartfast]

So what do you conclude from this?

It is unlikely an official statement was taken.

[Vertigo Swirl]

IMO as a witness JT was unreliable due to the quality and consistency of her statements. Even supporters have suggested she was 30-45 Minutes out with her sighting.

Do you dispute the fact that for many years many sceptics ridiculed the very existence of Tannerman?  Yes or no?

[Vertigo Swirl]

It is unlikely an official statement was taken.

So a failing on the part of the GNR then.

[slartibartfast]

So a failing on the part of the GNR then.

IMO it is outwith their role.

[slartibartfast]

Do you dispute the fact that for many years many sceptics ridiculed the very existence of Tannerman?  Yes or no?

Yes as an abductor...

[Vertigo Swirl]

If Jane Tanner genuinely saw a man carrying a child and sceptics believe she genuinely did see a man carrying a child in close proximity to 5a on the evening Madeleine went missing then what reason do they have for ridiculing her sighting?  Perhaps Slarti could explain that.

[Brietta]

IMO it is outwith their role.

Does the GNR - if it was them, she is quoted as also saying 'local police' - not pass, via the chain of command information in a missing child case to the investigating officers?  Why don't you find that extraordinary that they don't according to you?

[ShiningInLuz]

Does the GNR - if it was them, she is quoted as also saying 'local police' - not pass, via the chain of command information in a missing child case to the investigating officers?  Why don't you find that extraordinary that they don't according to you?

The issue was a formal statement.  No such formal statement appears in the Files.

[Brietta]

The issue was a formal statement.  No such formal statement appears in the Files.

What issue?

What formal statement?

[Robittybob1]

So Totman takes his daughter home, puts her down, picks her up again and goes out again.  All before 9.15pm?  Hardly likely, is it.

With a change of pyjamas as well for Tanner should have recalled the orange bits on the Totman's kept pyjamas.
I personally found the fact that Totman kept those pyjamas one of the oddest things in this case.  Did he know that presentation of those pyjamas were going to be crucial in solving the McCann case 11 or more years later?

[Robittybob1]

How do you know Dr Totman's evidence was given to the PJ in May 2007?

Didn't Mrs Totman say that in the recent news article?

[Robittybob1]

Not as far as it being Madeleine and her abductor. It was a false trail - IMO

But that was never Jane Tanner who claimed that IMO.

[jassi]

But that was never Jane Tanner who claimed that IMO.

By November 2007 she was convinced that she had seen the abductor taking Madeleine away

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1177.60  Post 61

[slartibartfast]

Does the GNR - if it was them, she is quoted as also saying 'local police' - not pass, via the chain of command information in a missing child case to the investigating officers?  Why don't you find that extraordinary that they don't according to you?

You said GNR in post #129?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9601.msg465365#msg465365

[Vertigo Swirl]

By November 2007 she was convinced that she had seen the abductor taking Madeleine away

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1177.60  Post 61

Thanks for finding this thread, I hope Slarti will accept it as my cite for people accusing JT.