It has never been explained why Julian Totman was walking the wrong way?

[jassi]

Neither have either of these men been shown to be even the teeniest bit guilty of anything.

[Alice Purjorick]

Neither of the men + associated child have been 100% positively identified as innocent people carrying their own child. Despite PJ appeals in May 2007 which provided a description of the man/his clothing wandering around the streets of Luz at around 9.30pm & the subsequent SY appeal in 2013, the only revelation has been that Dr. Totman was in the vicinity around the relevant time.

All true and drops both neatly into the bucket labelled "more evidence required" but does not address the question I posed.

[misty]

Neither have either of these men been shown to be even the teeniest bit guilty of anything.

They have not been traced, investigated & eliminated. Therefore their innocence or guilt has never been tested (in the kangaroo court or otherwise)

[misty]

All true and drops both neatly into the bucket labelled "more evidence required" but does not address the question I posed.

See previous answer. If PJ wanted to build a case against a person based purely on flimsy circumstantial evidence, failing to eliminate 2 potential abductors or innocent fathers would prevent matters getting past any PP.
The only thing preventing both sightings from being non-abductors is the PJ failure to identify & investigate.

[Robittybob1]

See previous answer. If PJ wanted to build a case against a person based purely on flimsy circumstantial evidence, failing to eliminate 2 potential abductors or innocent fathers would prevent matters getting past any PP.
The only thing from preventing both sightings from being non-abductors is the PJ failure to identify & investigate.

Why isn't the last statement opinion Misty?

[misty]

Why isn't the last statement opinion Misty?

Because it's a fact.

[Robittybob1]

Because it's a fact.

Can you explain it briefly please.

[misty]

Can you explain it briefly please.

It would be simpler to ask what the PJ did to identify those 2 sightings.

[Robittybob1]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/screenshots/drawingJaneTanner.jpg



The image on the left is the one done by Gail Cooper but who drew the one on the right?

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/screenshots/drawingJaneTanner.jpg  Has an incorrect title "Drawings of the man described by Jane Tanner".  IMO they are drawings of the man described by Gail Cooper merged with the sketch by Jane Tanner.  They are artistic impressions of two men combined into one.

[Robittybob1]

You can say people thought it had been given to them, or that people believed it was given to them, or that it should have been given to them, but you can't say it was given to them unless it was.

It is like posting a letter in the hope it gets to the destination intended.

[Robittybob1]

Yes, the Wilkins were in 4O and the Totmans were in 4M. Jez Wilkins managed to find the PJ and speak to them on 4th May;

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY-WILKINS.htm

Was that before or after they visited their apartment?  With Jez speaking to Gerry the night before I can see why Gerry is targeted for a visit. but why extend that to the others in the block?

[Robittybob1]

“Through Murat we answered a few questions and gave our details, which the policeman wrote down on the back of a bit of paper. No notebook. Then he pointed to the photocopied picture of Madeleine on the table. "Is this your daughter?" he asked. "Er, no," we said. "That's the girl you are meant to be searching for." My heart sank for the McCanns.”

That's from an article  "https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/dec/14/ukcrime.madeleinemccann"

[Miss Taken Identity]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/screenshots/drawingJaneTanner.jpg  Has an incorrect title "Drawings of the man described by Jane Tanner".  IMO they are drawings of the man described by Gail Cooper merged with the sketch by Jane Tanner.  They are artistic impressions of two men combined into one.

I really can't hold my laugh in when I see these 'postsers' of would be 'abductors'  when you read JT'a description and then see these full frontal  detailed poster with teeth- what a nice set of gnashers he has- for an abductor that is...

and another with a Tash.... looking like Victoria Beckham on a bad day.

[pathfinder73]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/screenshots/drawingJaneTanner.jpg  Has an incorrect title "Drawings of the man described by Jane Tanner".  IMO they are drawings of the man described by Gail Cooper merged with the sketch by Jane Tanner.  They are artistic impressions of two men combined into one.

See the sketches in the link below.

Rex Morgan

He is the father of Linda Sims who contacted us to say that were male individuals making collections in Praia da Luz, for a local charity. He was questioned as well as his wife Iris Morgan.

Iris Morgan also made a photo fit and she was shown the photo fit (sketch) made by Gail Cooper. She does not recognise this individual. The photo fit made by her does not correspond to the other photo fit (sketch).

Denise Ashton

She was shown the photo fits (sketches) made by Gail Cooper and did not recognise this person as being the individual in question. A statement will be sent to you on 21st January.



http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POWERPOINT.htm

[Sunny]

See the sketches in the link below.

Rex Morgan

He is the father of Linda Sims who contacted us to say that were male individuals making collections in Praia da Luz, for a local charity. He was questioned as well as his wife Iris Morgan.

Iris Morgan also made a photo fit and she was shown the photo fit (sketch) made by Gail Cooper. She does not recognise this individual. The photo fit made by her does not correspond to the other photo fit (sketch).

Denise Ashton

She was shown the photo fits (sketches) made by Gail Cooper and did not recognise this person as being the individual in question. A statement will be sent to you on 21st January.



http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/POWERPOINT.htm

Jane Tanner said an 80% chance of this man being Madeleine's abductor but it looks nothing like Julian Totman.

I had never seen this before but I have read that the powerpoint presentations were supplied by the McCanns to the PJ. Is this right?