UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Alleged Miscarriages of Justice => Jeremy Bamber and the callous murder of his father, mother, sister and twin nephews. Case effectively CLOSED by CCRC on basis of NO APPEAL REFERRAL. => Topic started by: starryian on April 02, 2013, 02:36:01 PM
-
Can someone tell me who this 'Martin' character is from the blue forum? Besides slagging me off in the forum he has this deluded idea that me and one 'Steveuk' are one and the same person, The sad swine. He also............this will make you laugh.......thinks that we both 'erm.........'assist the police on the Bamber case' Exactly how he fails to elaborate on and provides not a jot of evidence or his reasons. The rest of the blue forum have warmly congratulated this moron on his 'excellent research'
I nearly fell off my chair laughing. @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
-
Can someone tell me who this 'Martin' character is from the blue forum? Besides slagging me off in the forum he has this deluded idea that me and one 'Steveuk' are one and the same person, The sad swine. He also............this will make you laugh.......thinks that we both 'erm.........'assist the police on the Bamber case' Exactly how he fails to elaborate on and provides not a jot of evidence or his reasons. The rest of the blue forum have warmly congratulated this moron on his 'excellent research'
I nearly fell off my chair laughing. @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
Hi Ian...welcome back mate. I wouldn't worry about that lot after the piffle they have been posting lately. We know who Steve is and his associations with the Eatons in particular, I don't know if you have looked in at the blue forum over the last few months but you haven't missed anything really.
-
Hi Angelo,
Thanks for letting me know. I think they have completely lost the plot over there. All sorts of bizarre suggestions and theories. 8-)(--)
-
Hi Angelo,
Thanks for letting me know. I think they have completely lost the plot over there. All sorts of bizarre suggestions and theories. 8-)(--)
theres a fair amount of paranoia over on the Blue forum , they seem to suspect everyone who is not pro-bamber
-
Having read more of this 'Martin's' puerile rantings I am convinced that Tesko's cronies are almost certainly recruited from the local asylum. He seems to think I am steveuk and someone called 'The machine' I am sorry but the man is a complete shi*stirring p*ick. The funny thing is, is that they all congratulate this loser on his 'research'
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
You can't make this up! :-)
-
Having read more of this 'Martin's' puerile rantings I am convinced that Tesko's cronies are almost certainly recruited from the local asylum. He seems to think I am steveuk and someone called 'The machine' I am sorry but the man is a complete shi*stirring p*ick. The funny thing is, is that they all congratulate this loser on his 'research'
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
You can't make this up! :-)
they can and do make it up over there
that steveuk is quite eloquent in his comments and always put a smile on my face
-
I just had to reply to Martins rantings. I posted on there here it is in full. I was able to post under the name Franklin Fortune. I do not usually respond to pettiness but this prick has tried to name me (he got that wrong as well) I felt it necessary to respond for the one and only time.
Martin,
It is payback time. Just want to put you straight about a few issues before I get banned and return to normality and people that can reason. Lets start at your first accusation. I am not nor have I ever been someone called 'steveuk' Nor am I someone called 'The Machine'. True I am starryian and I am steadfast regarding the views about the despicable child murderer that you are deluded into thinking is somehow innocent. You 'research' erm....'skills' are quite frankly the most inaccurate, moronic and totally incorrect I have ever come across. If you want to impress people 'Martin' try to get your facts right. You have just made yourself in front of everyone, look like the complete prick that you are. I will be posting this in it's entirety on the 'red side' because I know this post will be deleted rather quickly because you are incapable of accepting the truth. The messages I have read about you speak volumes for your character.
You're sychophantic to a fault 'Martin' and obviously you are punching way above your meagre intellectual weight. In my opinion you are a self-satisfied, dirt-digging, toadying little turd. Next time you try to impress your cronies, get your facts right first, before you make yourself look like the sensation-seeking retard that you are. You have been exposed 'Martin' for the liar and fake that you are.
This tosser has had this coming for months. Sorry everyone but I feel it has to be said. This cretin has had his way virtually unchallenged over there, saying what the hell he likes and getting congratulated for it.
Have a nice day everyone 8)-)))
-
I just had to reply to Martins rantings. I posted on there here it is in full. I was able to post under the name Franklin Fortune. I do not usually respond to pettiness but this prick has tried to name me (he got that wrong as well) I felt it necessary to respond for the one and only time.
Martin,
It is payback time. Just want to put you straight about a few issues before I get banned and return to normality and people that can reason. Lets start at your first accusation. I am not nor have I ever been someone called 'steveuk' Nor am I someone called 'The Machine'. True I am starryian and I am steadfast regarding the views about the despicable child murderer that you are deluded into thinking is somehow innocent. You 'research' erm....'skills' are quite frankly the most inaccurate, moronic and totally incorrect I have ever come across. If you want to impress people 'Martin' try to get your facts right. You have just made yourself in front of everyone, look like the complete prick that you are. I will be posting this in it's entirety on the 'red side' because I know this post will be deleted rather quickly because you are incapable of accepting the truth. The messages I have read about you speak volumes for your character.
You're sychophantic to a fault 'Martin' and obviously you are punching way above your meagre intellectual weight. In my opinion you are a self-satisfied, dirt-digging, toadying little turd. Next time you try to impress your cronies, get your facts right first, before you make yourself look like the sensation-seeking retard that you are. You have been exposed 'Martin' for the liar and fake that you are.
This tosser has had this coming for months. Sorry everyone but I feel it has to be said. This cretin has had his way virtually unchallenged over there, saying what the hell he likes and getting congratulated for it.
Have a nice day everyone 8)-)))
"Meagre intellectual weight!!!"
Oh Ian, you're such a dude!! 8((()*/
-
It is "par for the course" on that place. I hope you had the honour of being promptly banned. @)(++(*
Personally I never go there now and cleared my cache to make sure it would take me some effort to do so again in the event of my being "exposed."
I now only spent my time on honest and sensible conspiracy sites like:
#hitlerwasaniceman/blogspot; #mickphilpotwasframed/blogspot; and of course anything to do with simonhall.
@)(++(*
-
Gawd, Ian, you've been called self-obsessed by......GLADYS!!! Oh the pie in me!!!
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
I have actually wet my pants. 8(8-))
Hallo Gladys, by the way!! Coo-ee!! 8((()*/
-
Gawd, Ian, you've been called self-obsessed by......GLADYS!!! Oh the pie in me!!!
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
I have actually wet my pants. 8(8-))
Hallo Gladys, by the way!! Coo-ee!! 8((()*/
Now now...lets not feed Glady's little obsessions. After all, he'll have to get the soap out to wash his paws.
-
Gawd, Ian, you've been called self-obsessed by......GLADYS!!! Oh the pie in me!!!
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
I have actually wet my pants. 8(8-))
Hallo Gladys, by the way!! Coo-ee!! 8((()*/
Now now...lets not feed Glady's little obsessions. After all, he'll have to get the soap out to wash his paws.
But he NEVER COMES HERE John!!
Doh. Wet my pants again. ?8)@)-)
-
I just had to reply to Martins rantings. I posted on there here it is in full. I was able to post under the name Franklin Fortune. I do not usually respond to pettiness but this prick has tried to name me (he got that wrong as well) I felt it necessary to respond for the one and only time.
Martin,
It is payback time. Just want to put you straight about a few issues before I get banned and return to normality and people that can reason. Lets start at your first accusation. I am not nor have I ever been someone called 'steveuk' Nor am I someone called 'The Machine'. True I am starryian and I am steadfast regarding the views about the despicable child murderer that you are deluded into thinking is somehow innocent. You 'research' erm....'skills' are quite frankly the most inaccurate, moronic and totally incorrect I have ever come across. If you want to impress people 'Martin' try to get your facts right. You have just made yourself in front of everyone, look like the complete prick that you are. I will be posting this in it's entirety on the 'red side' because I know this post will be deleted rather quickly because you are incapable of accepting the truth. The messages I have read about you speak volumes for your character.
You're sychophantic to a fault 'Martin' and obviously you are punching way above your meagre intellectual weight. In my opinion you are a self-satisfied, dirt-digging, toadying little turd. Next time you try to impress your cronies, get your facts right first, before you make yourself look like the sensation-seeking retard that you are. You have been exposed 'Martin' for the liar and fake that you are.
This tosser has had this coming for months. Sorry everyone but I feel it has to be said. This cretin has had his way virtually unchallenged over there, saying what the hell he likes and getting congratulated for it.
Have a nice day everyone 8)-)))
"Meagre intellectual weight!!!"
Oh Ian, you're such a dude!! 8((()*/
Thanks Shona great to see you. Seems so long now (where has all the time gone?). and so good to be back and kicking some a*s. Now where did I leave my steel toecap workboots again? >@@(*&)
8((()*/
-
But he NEVER COMES HERE John!!
Doh. Wet my pants again. ?8)@)-)
I know Shona, he must get his info by telepathy @)(++(*
-
But he NEVER COMES HERE John!!
Doh. Wet my pants again. ?8)@)-)
I know Shona, he must get his info by telepathy @)(++(*
I see that he's back to hiding behind illness and religion, and insulting women, while still in his jimmy-jammys. What a guy!!
-
But he NEVER COMES HERE John!!
Doh. Wet my pants again. ?8)@)-)
I know Shona, he must get his info by telepathy @)(++(*
You mean by Devine Intervention?? @)(++(*
-
Can someone tell me who this 'Martin' character is from the blue forum? Besides slagging me off in the forum he has this deluded idea that me and one 'Steveuk' are one and the same person, The sad swine. He also............this will make you laugh.......thinks that we both 'erm.........'assist the police on the Bamber case' Exactly how he fails to elaborate on and provides not a jot of evidence or his reasons. The rest of the blue forum have warmly congratulated this moron on his 'excellent research'
I nearly fell off my chair laughing. @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
He's Mike's doppelgänger @)(++(*
-
One of Mike's Socket-Puppets. There are only about 12 people on that site and four of them are Mike. @)(++(*
It sets a new standard in madness.
-
Is this 'Martin' character Grahame Belton? That unemployed internet troll from Maldon in Essex?
-
Is this 'Martin' character Grahame Belton? That unemployed internet troll from Maldon in Essex?
@)(++(* No, THAT'S Lugg, the zoophilia king!!
-
Right so Lugg is Belton. Researching that infantile hypocrite is like watching two ugly people have sex 8)><(
Ewwwwwwwww!
-
Right so Lugg is Belton. Researching that infantile hypocrite is like watching two ugly people have sex 8)><(
Ewwwwwwwww!
And one of them would have to be a poodle. 8)-)))
-
Absolutely Shona, @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
Any idea who 'Martin' is?
-
Absolutely Shona, @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
Any idea who 'Martin' is?
I don't know, Ian, I've never come across such a bunch of fraggles. Every time I read over there it feels like a trip to Botton. 8-)(--)
-
Yes Shona,
The multiple personality club. They have invented so many different personalities for themselves that they have forgotten which is their real one. Belton (if he can still remember that name?) seems to swap persona's as often as snake sheds it's skin. I am sure they have arguments with each other not knowing just who is who. It is something akin to a lunatic asylum. 8-)(--)
I am sure when two of them go out to dinner they debate whether to split the bill four ways @)(++(*
Furthermore, when they phone each other their caller ID probably exploded. 8()(((@# 8)><(
-
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now? ?>)()<
-
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now? ?>)()<
Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel. >@@(*&)
-
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now? ?>)()<
Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel. >@@(*&)
It is just Tesco masturbating again. He really is a feeble, inadequate, little man. Quite pathetic.
-
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now? ?>)()<
Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel. >@@(*&)
It is just Tesco masturbating again. He really is a feeble, inadequate, little man. Quite pathetic.
I'm afraid that Mike has been having a massive wank at the expense of Sheila for many years, now. If anyone objects they get banned, or called a f..king s..mbag. So some stay, and salve his tortured conscience. Because they need to talk to faceless weirdos who just might be fat old men or lonely losers sitting in pants full of Big Mac crumbs.
-
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now? ?>)()<
Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel. >@@(*&)
It is just Tesco masturbating again. He really is a feeble, inadequate, little man. Quite pathetic.
I'm afraid that Mike has been having a massive wank at the expense of Sheila for many years, now. If anyone objects they get banned, or called a f..king s..mbag. So some stay, and salve his tortured conscience. Because they need to talk to faceless weirdos who just might be fat old men or lonely losers sitting in pants full of Big Mac crumbs.
And if anyone can look at that image of Sheila and still consider that she was on the bed/off the bed/in the kitchen/running upstairs/barking like a dog/waving a gun about in the doorway....they need their bumps read.
-
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now? ?>)()<
Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel. >@@(*&)
You can't get blood out of a stone. The Teskowski's are insolvent.
-
Yes the case is officially dead in it's tracks now. Bamber is a complete lost cause for his supporters. To get referred back to the court of appeal needs fresh evidence; not the re-hashed and recycled garbage of his last attempt that the CCRC saw through very quickly, but real, fresh evidence. To my mind this is all, but impossible. He will indeed spend the rest of his life behind bars. However, that won't put his supporters off trying and espousing more bovine excrement in their quest to have him released. I think there comes a time when people must realise it's all over and simply admit defeat, or at least shelve it - all except these kind of people. For whatever reason their delusions run very deep. Many times I have attempted to engage them in a sensible, logical and questioning dialogue, only to be fobbed off with the standard "I just don't feel Jeremy could have done it" and then insist on seeing hard evidence that points to his guilt. Not realising the hypocrisy between the two statements and feel smug and comforted when they insist on seeing hard evidence they know full well does not exist. This has been and always will be a strong cirumstantial case. This makes them extremely uncomfortable. They want eye-witness statements, DNA matches, blood evidence, fingerprint evidence in a case where the killer was extremely devious and left very little in the way of hard physical evidence and covered his tracks with diabolical cunning. Moreover, the shoddy investigation left the proverbial floodgate open for them to conjure-up all manner of crackpot and often ludicrous theories to justify their beliefs. Then we have the fact that Bamber himself is a highly charistmatic, attractive and manipulative individual that will readily banish someone from his life if they have nothing to offer him or are no longer of any use to him, despite the fact that the supporter has often campaigned very hard and given up so much for him.
This certainly is not the first time this has happened. There are many psychopathic murderers that have seen the merits in manipulating well-meaning people into supporting them from their prison cell and drive them into getting them released, with promises they will never keep.
These murderers usually have a common thread - their utter inability to take responsibility for their actions. They continue the lie until people start to take notice. They play on their vulnerabilities - on their sympathy especially. The 'hard done by' routine. Bamber exploits this very well as a whole plethora of sickening sentimental youtube videos will testify. It is a well-used routine by these people. They know it can be very effective.
I do have much sympathy for these supporters. They devote so much of their own time to try to overturn a conviction in what they see as a miscarriage of justice, when in reality it is nothing of the sort.
We have all discussed the pro and cons of the case in-depth and quite comprehensively and ariived at the conclusion that the man is clearly guilty. Now that his appeals have virtually been exhausted and his whole sham attempt at trying to trick well-meaning people into believing he is innocent has run it's course, we can confine this case to where it belonged when he was first convicted in October of 1986 - to history.
-
Yes the case is officially dead in it's tracks now. Bamber is a complete lost cause for his supporters. To get referred back to the court of appeal needs fresh evidence; not the re-hashed and recycled garbage of his last attempt that the CCRC saw through very quickly, but real, fresh evidence. To my mind this is all, but impossible. He will indeed spend the rest of his life behind bars. However, that won't put his supporters off trying and espousing more bovine excrement in their quest to have him released. I think there comes a time when people must realise it's all over and simply admit defeat, or at least shelve it - all except these kind of people. For whatever reason their delusions run very deep. Many times I have attempted to engage them in a sensible, logical and questioning dialogue, only to be fobbed off with the standard "I just don't feel Jeremy could have done it" and then insist on seeing hard evidence that points to his guilt. Not realising the hypocrisy between the two statements and feel smug and comforted when they insist on seeing hard evidence they know full well does not exist. This has been and always will be a strong cirumstantial case. This makes them extremely uncomfortable. They want eye-witness statements, DNA matches, blood evidence, fingerprint evidence in a case where the killer was extremely devious and left very little in the way of hard physical evidence and covered his tracks with diabolical cunning. Moreover, the shoddy investigation left the proverbial floodgate open for them to conjure-up all manner of crackpot and often ludicrous theories to justify their beliefs. Then we have the fact that Bamber himself is a highly charistmatic, attractive and manipulative individual that will readily banish someone from his life if they have nothing to offer him or are no longer of any use to him, despite the fact that the supporter has often campaigned very hard and given up so much for him.
This certainly is not the first time this has happened. There are many psychopathic murderers that have seen the merits in manipulating well-meaning people into supporting them from their prison cell and drive them into getting them released, with promises they will never keep.
These murderers usually have a common thread - their utter inability to take responsibility for their actions. They continue the lie until people start to take notice. They play on their vulnerabilities - on their sympathy especially. The 'hard done by' routine. Bamber exploits this very well as a whole plethora of sickening sentimental youtube videos will testify. It is a well-used routine by these people. They know it can be very effective.
I do have much sympathy for these supporters. They devote so much of their own time to try to overturn a conviction in what they see as a miscarriage of justice, when in reality it is nothing of the sort.
We have all discussed the pro and cons of the case in-depth and quite comprehensively and ariived at the conclusion that the man is clearly guilty. Now that his appeals have virtually been exhausted and his whole sham attempt at trying to trick well-meaning people into believing he is innocent has run it's course, we can confine this case to where it belonged when he was first convicted in October of 1986 - to history.
Excellent post Ian. The impression I get from the Blue forum now is that they know the game is up. Oddly enough when the last Judicial Review was rejected they seemed weirdly optimistic that it was a minor setback other than the final nail in the coffin that we saw it as. Quite frankly that forum has a bunch of people with way too much time on their hands who feel it is a far fetched idea that Bamber could have committed the murders. They then hypothesise about who did it instead with much more far fetched ideas (Sheila had no blood on her because she had a shower, Sheila barked like a dog which is what the operator heard, it was a drugs gang who committed the murders then framed Jeremy by making it look like Sheila did it) without seeing the irony. I think it does attract the disenfranchised and those who are suspicious of authority and the police in particular. I understand suspicion of authority and that the authorities can and do manipulate things for their own motives. The late, great Bill Hicks (if you ever wondered why I chose my particular profile name there's a clue!) once said if you're not paranoid you're just not paying attention. And of course the recent high profile admission that South Yorks police covered up at Hillsborough just adds fuel to their fire, if it happened once surely it could happen again? However, I don't see the authorities had anything to gain by putting Bamber in jail if he wasn't guilty and any suggestion of masons, drugs gangs, special branch and who knows what else is just an elaborate and incredible fantasy made up by people who think it stretches belief to think Jeremy could have done it when in all honesty it's clearly the only scenario that makes any sense.
-
Well said Goatboy,
I totally agree. The collective delusion that seems to effect those supporters is very telling. They usually start out from a fantasy theory often instigated by Tesko. This sets in motion the proverbial snowball effect, with the poster in turn following the initial lead, but elaborating on it and shaping it that little bit more until it becomes almost gospel. This process rarely seems questioned along the way except for lone posters such as Steveuk and Bridget. But their posts have a unifying effect on the collective as each supporter tries to outdo the other in their attempts in debunk what is now viewed as virtual heresy. This seems to be quite common in group psychology - akin to a politiical party towing the 'party line' No-one seems to have the ability to step back and see it for what it is - complete garbage started by Mike Tesko or one of his close sychophantic cronies.
They fail to see that they are being wholly and roundly manipulated all the way down the line in order for a devious, cunning, psychopathic child murderer pulling the puppet strings to squirm out of his just punishment.
-
Well said Goatboy,
I totally agree. The collective delusion that seems to effect those supporters is very telling. They usually start out from a fantasy theory often instigated by Tesko. This sets in motion the proverbial snowball effect, with the poster in turn following the initial lead, but elaborating on it and shaping it that little bit more until it becomes almost gospel. This process rarely seems questioned along the way except for lone posters such as Steveuk and Bridget. But their posts have a unifying effect on the collective as each supporter tries to outdo the other in their attempts in debunk what is now viewed as virtual heresy. This seems to be quite common in group psychology - akin to a politiical party towing the 'party line' No-one seems to have the ability to step back and see it for what it is - complete garbage started by Mike Tesko or one of his close sychophantic cronies.
They fail to see that they are being wholly and roundly manipulated all the way down the line in order for a devious, cunning, psychopathic child murderer pulling the puppet strings to squirm out of his just punishment.
It is what we call Group Reinforcement Syndrome (or Therapy). A bit like Religious Groups or things like Alcoholics Anonymous do. Sometimes it works for good, sometimes for evil. "My name is "x" and I am an Alcoholic." Then they all nod and hug each other and say things they would never dream of individually in a unsympathetic forum. Oprah and Jeremy Kyle have this off to a "tee" with their freak shows. The Nazis and Communists do the same trick. Nobody wants to stand out as the only unbeliever in a potentially hostile group. The less friends a member has the better it works. Some extreme religious cults practice this to capture members.
I always found it weird they way Tesco obsesses about that picture of Sheila. He even has it on his Facebook page. He must really worship it. He also used to have several pictures of a strangely young Jeremy on his Facebook page too but they seem to have gone and been replaced with endless pictures of bleak snow covered moorland and dead trees that resemble gallows. You can always tell a person's soul from their pictures.
I suppose his handful of deluded supporters must be the same.
-
I now believe most of Bamber's cronies are supporting him for their own ends. I have read alot of what they have been posting lately and it's getting more and more obscure, bizzare, deluded and self-ingratiating.
Some of their points are becoming ludicrous - such as Mike Tesko writing pages and pages on his forum of script that imitates Batman. 8-)(--)
This is not going to warm him to new, potential supporters. (If there is such a thing)
Bamber and his house of cards has collapsed. It was exposed for what it was a long time ago. His campaign was nothing more than a fraudulent attempt by a child-murdering, callous and evil psychopath trying to squirm out of his just punishment. He honed his arguments through years of repetition and taking on board the ideas of his cronies he then wove a cunning fabric of lies built on any perceived discrepancy found in court transcripts.
His manipulation of his supporters - particularly women - was in keeping with his callousness.
His repeated protestations of innocence were his undoing. If he 'fessed up' when he was first caught he may, just may have seen the light of day again. But his own arrogance got the better of him again. The courts saw this man for what he was - A vile murderer, incapable of taking responsibility for his own actions, of feeling any kind of remorse and repeatedly lying. In short, a man who is completely unfit to live in society.
-
I can't see him ever being released and that must piss Tesko et all off no end. All those wasted years following a ghost.
-
I can't see him ever being released and that must piss Tesko et all off no end. All those wasted years following a ghost.
it'll piss Tesko off alright , i'm pretty sure he has his eye on that so called reward that Bamber put up
-
I can't see him ever being released and that must piss Tesko et all off no end. All those wasted years following a ghost.
it'll piss Tesko off alright , i'm pretty sure he has his eye on that so called reward that Bamber put up
He certainly did, until Bamber changed allegiance and promised everything to a "piece of pussy"!! @)(++(*
-
I can't see him ever being released and that must piss Tesko et all off no end. All those wasted years following a ghost.
it'll piss Tesko off alright , i'm pretty sure he has his eye on that so called reward that Bamber put up
He certainly did, until Bamber changed allegiance and promised everything to a "piece of pussy"!! @)(++(*
Is that cat even on the scene any more or has she been dumped as well? I have lost count of them all now after nearly 28 years.