Author Topic: Martin  (Read 13394 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Martin
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2013, 03:02:57 PM »

But he NEVER COMES HERE John!!

Doh. Wet my pants again.    ?8)@)-)


I know Shona, he must get his info by telepathy   @)(++(*

You mean by Devine Intervention??   @)(++(*
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Martin
« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2013, 05:06:12 PM »
Can someone tell me who this 'Martin' character is from the blue forum? Besides slagging me off in the forum he has this deluded idea that me and one 'Steveuk' are one and the same person, The sad swine. He also............this will make you laugh.......thinks that we both 'erm.........'assist the police on the Bamber case' Exactly how he fails to elaborate on and provides not a jot of evidence or his reasons. The rest of the blue forum have warmly congratulated this moron on his 'excellent research'
I nearly fell off my chair laughing. @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

He's Mike's doppelgänger   @)(++(*
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline Outlook

Re: Martin
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2013, 08:39:28 PM »
One of Mike's Socket-Puppets.  There are only about 12 people on that site and four of them are Mike.   @)(++(*

It sets a new standard in madness.

Offline starryian

Re: Martin
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2013, 06:19:36 PM »
Is this 'Martin' character Grahame Belton? That unemployed internet troll from Maldon in Essex?
Starryian..

Offline puglove

Re: Martin
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2013, 07:24:49 PM »
Is this 'Martin' character Grahame Belton? That unemployed internet troll from Maldon in Essex?

 @)(++(*    No, THAT'S Lugg, the zoophilia king!!
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline starryian

Re: Martin
« Reply #20 on: April 18, 2013, 01:35:16 PM »
Right so Lugg is Belton. Researching that infantile hypocrite is like watching two ugly people have sex 8)><(

Ewwwwwwwww!
Starryian..

Offline puglove

Re: Martin
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2013, 02:27:37 PM »
Right so Lugg is Belton. Researching that infantile hypocrite is like watching two ugly people have sex 8)><(

Ewwwwwwwww!

And one of them would have to be a poodle.    8)-)))
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline starryian

Re: Martin
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2013, 05:22:11 PM »
Absolutely Shona, @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
Any idea who 'Martin' is?
Starryian..

Offline puglove

Re: Martin
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2013, 06:02:22 PM »
Absolutely Shona, @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
Any idea who 'Martin' is?

I don't know, Ian, I've never come across such a bunch of fraggles. Every time I read over there it feels like a trip to Botton.    8-)(--)
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline starryian

Re: Martin
« Reply #24 on: April 19, 2013, 04:56:41 AM »
Yes Shona,
The multiple personality club. They have invented so many different personalities for themselves that they have forgotten which is their real one. Belton (if he can still remember that name?) seems to swap persona's as often as snake sheds it's skin. I am sure they have arguments with each other not knowing just who is who. It is something akin to a lunatic asylum.  8-)(--)

I am sure when two of them go out to dinner they debate whether to split the bill four ways  @)(++(*

Furthermore, when they phone each other their caller ID probably exploded. 8()(((@#   8)><(
Starryian..

Offline Admin

Re: Martin
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2013, 09:14:21 PM »
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now?   ?>)()<

Offline puglove

Re: Martin
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2013, 11:20:28 PM »
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now?   ?>)()<

Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel.    >@@(*&)
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Outlook

Re: Martin
« Reply #27 on: April 21, 2013, 12:21:01 AM »
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now?   ?>)()<

Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel.    >@@(*&)
It is just Tesco masturbating again.  He really is a feeble, inadequate, little man.  Quite pathetic.

Offline puglove

Re: Martin
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2013, 12:37:51 AM »
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now?   ?>)()<

Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel.    >@@(*&)
It is just Tesco masturbating again.  He really is a feeble, inadequate, little man.  Quite pathetic.

I'm afraid that Mike has been having a massive wank at the expense of Sheila for many years, now. If anyone objects they get banned, or called a f..king s..mbag. So some stay, and salve his tortured conscience. Because they need to talk to faceless weirdos who just might be fat old men or lonely losers sitting in pants full of Big Mac crumbs.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Martin
« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2013, 12:46:01 AM »
Is the Bamber case dead in its tracks now?   ?>)()<

Hasn't it been for nearly 30 years? It's quite sweet how Mike's cribbed from my posts though, about how Ralph's body ended up in it's precarious position. He's copied me word for word, the little tinker. But I can't say that I approve of how he and Logout have been slavering over Ann's supposed "tugging at her knickers" and begging Bamber for sex because her husband wasn't satisfying her. I suppose he must be Batman after all, he seems impervious to libel.    >@@(*&)
It is just Tesco masturbating again.  He really is a feeble, inadequate, little man.  Quite pathetic.

I'm afraid that Mike has been having a massive wank at the expense of Sheila for many years, now. If anyone objects they get banned, or called a f..king s..mbag. So some stay, and salve his tortured conscience. Because they need to talk to faceless weirdos who just might be fat old men or lonely losers sitting in pants full of Big Mac crumbs.

And if anyone can look at that image of Sheila and still consider that she was on the bed/off the bed/in the kitchen/running upstairs/barking like a dog/waving a gun about in the doorway....they need their bumps read.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.