UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Topic started by: amaraltheofficeboy on April 15, 2013, 07:52:45 PM
-
for removing those videos.
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.
-
I dont see why they should be.
Gilet exposed lies.
Those exposees should remain, to show what is out there ... cos I bet HiDehoi hasn't removed her lying propagnada from the internet
Why are you so keen to hide the exposee, Icabod?
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.
I disagree
It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned, which I have no opportunity to read myself
What is the point of a 'review' of subject matter I have no access to ?
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.
I disagree
It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned, which I have no opportunity to read myself
What is the point of a 'review' of subject matter I have no access to ?
Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?
In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.
Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.
-
Lying propaganda was exposed. There is no way it can be exposed on the internet as far as I am aware
gilets reviews should be reinstated pls Admin. They are the only record, as far as I am aware, of the false information / propaganda being given out by these gawd awful videos fronted by an abomination of a drawing of Madeleine..
HiDeHo has flooded the internet with them. !50 of the damned things. Massive propaganda to entrap the unwary
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.
I disagree
It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned, which I have no opportunity to read myself
What is the point of a 'review' of subject matter I have no access to ?
Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?
When you post such idiocy then you really do yourself no favours at all. It makes you look silly.
In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.
Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.
Calm down gilet
I know you're upset that posts you put a great deal of effort into compiling have disappeared ( and I understand that ) ... but the rebuttals are no longer relevent, given that the subject matter you were rebutting has disappeared itself
Do you not see that ?
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.
I disagree
It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned, which I have no opportunity to read myself
What is the point of a 'review' of subject matter I have no access to ?
Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?
When you post such idiocy then you really do yourself no favours at all. It makes you look silly.
In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.
Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.
Calm down gilet
I know you're upset that posts you put a great deal of effort into compiling have disappeared ( and I understand that ) ... but the rebuttals are no longer relevent, given that the subject matter you were rebutting has disappeared itself
Do you not see that ?
Don't try to be patronising. I am perfectly calm as my reasoned posts demonstrate.
No. I do not see that at all and I have clearly explained my reasoning as to why I do not see that.
As you are ignoring my reasoning and the points I have carefully laid out to explain it or you have simply failed to understand the very clear points I have made and seem merely intent on repeating the same question ad infinitum (now two repeats and the original) then there is little more to be said to you other than go back and read slowly because my answer is in plain English and I am certain that others can understand where you have failed.
-
for removing those videos.
A shame that my reviews also disappeared.
Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?
Your reviews are redundant now
... that's the price of censorship
Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.
I disagree
It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned, which I have no opportunity to read myself
What is the point of a 'review' of subject matter I have no access to ?
Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?
When you post such idiocy then you really do yourself no favours at all. It makes you look silly.
In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.
Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.
Calm down gilet
I know you're upset that posts you put a great deal of effort into compiling have disappeared ( and I understand that ) ... but the rebuttals are no longer relevent, given that the subject matter you were rebutting has disappeared itself
Do you not see that ?
Don't try to be patronising. I am perfectly calm as my reasoned posts demonstrate.
No. I do not see that at all and I have clearly explained my reasoning as to why I do not see that.
As you are ignoring my reasoning and the points I have carefully laid out to explain it or you have simply failed to understand the very clear points I have made and seem merely intent on repeating the same question ad infinitum (now two repeats and the original) then there is little more to be said to you other than go back and read slowly because my answer is in plain English and I am certain that others can understand where you have failed.
I wasn't patronising, I was sympathising ... in truth, I was
-
Please note: The threads have not been deleted because they contain some really good posts within them as members have gone to a lot of trouble. As such we are keeping them in the archive for the moment to see if HiDeHo has the good grace to respond.
If she fails to do so we will reinstate the comments but not the actual videos where they are deemed to be misleading and/or inaccurate.
We might run a poll on this as well to gauge opinion. Thank you.
-
Please note: The threads have not been deleted because they contain some really good posts within them as members have gone to a lot of trouble. As such we are keeping them in the archive for the moment to see if HiDeHo has the good grace to respond.
If she fails to do so we will reinstate the comments but not the actual videos where they are deemed to be misleading and/or inaccurate.
We might run a poll on this as well to gauge opinion. Thank you.
Thank you for that information.
-
If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.
-
If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.
I have no idea if she has used a serious email address to access the forum but if she has, perhaps an email could be sent asking if she intends to respond or not?
-
We have her contact details in Canada but she knows very well the concerns that some members have expressed but regardless has chosen to remain silent on here.
We are aware that she has made comments elsewhere and this will all be taken into consideration.
-
If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.
I don't really understand what has gone on here, so feel unable to offer a possible solution
As far as I can tell, the forum accepted and posted the videos without giving hidiho a 'proviso' that she would be expected to defend them ... 'or else'
They have been removed now ... and that, I suppose, is that
I don't see how a member can be expected to defend an opinion ( or in this case, video ) which is no longer viewable on the forum
Similarly, I don't see how the responses made to a now unviewable thread can be of any significance to the forum
Show the videos and allow debate ... or ban the videos and end debate
Those are the only two credible options, I think
-
If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.
I don't really understand what has gone on here, so feel unable to offer a possible solution
As far as I can tell, the forum accepted and posted the videos without giving hidiho a 'proviso' that she would be expected to defend them ... 'or else'
They have been removed now ... and that, I suppose, is that
I don't see how a member can be expected to defend an opinion ( or in this case, video ) which is no longer viewable on the forum
Similarly, I don't see how the responses made to a now unviewable thread can be of any significance to the forum
Show the videos and allow debate ... or ban the videos and end debate
Those are the only two credible options, I think
As I have stated above (and given clear reasons for my opinion), I do not agree with you. Reviews are not simply valid or relevant when read in immediate conjunction with the topic they are reviewing, otherwise newspaper reviews of art exhibitions, theatre productions, books, films and music which millions read and, more importantly, use for information and guidance would simply not exist.
The fact that newspaper reviews exist in every publication and on many blogs and forums proves that they are of real interest to the reader who then may or may not go to find or see whatever was reviewed.
I notice that you have not responded again with your nonsense that you will not be able to find Hidheho's videos without them being directly linked to. That was clearly an argument too far in your desperate defence of her and your desperate desire to see the reviews banished I suspect.
As for Hideho not being able to defend herself against the reviews without the link being available here, again I find that ridiculous. She would defend the written review in the same way as any other poster defends themself against a post which challenges his or her point of view by writing a response. If she needs to refer to her own video in writing that response I have no doubt that she can find it in her own archive.
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago and there was no comment section available ... were comments removed again ?
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago and there was no comment section available ... were comments removed again ?
There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable. Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content. I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago and there was no comment section available ... were comments removed again ?
There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable. Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content. I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.
I think her forum is on facebook isn't it ... so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway ( not on facebook ) thanks anyway
Why is it that comments sections are removed from McCann articles so often do you think ? ... is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck ?
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago and there was no comment section available ... were comments removed again ?
There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable. Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content. I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.
I think her forum is on facebook isn't it ... so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway ( not on facebook ) thanks anyway
Why is it that comments sections are removed from McCann articles so often do you think ? ... is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck ?
I have no interest in her forum so I am unable to state where it is. As for why comments are removed, having read some of them, no comment.
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago and there was no comment section available ... were comments removed again ?
There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable. Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content. I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.
I think her forum is on facebook isn't it ... so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway ( not on facebook ) thanks anyway
Why is it that comments sections are removed from McCann articles so often do you think ? ... is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck ?
I have no interest in her forum so I am unable to state where it is. As for why comments are removed, having read some of them, no comment.
oh I'm sorry, I misunderstood ... I assumed that because you came to update us on what she is writing on her forum at present that you did have an interest in it, and had been reading it
-
HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward. I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum. 8)-)))
At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.
I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago and there was no comment section available ... were comments removed again ?
There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable. Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content. I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.
I think her forum is on facebook isn't it ... so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway ( not on facebook ) thanks anyway
Why is it that comments sections are removed from McCann articles so often do you think ? ... is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck ?
I have no interest in her forum so I am unable to state where it is. As for why comments are removed, having read some of them, no comment.
oh I'm sorry, I misunderstood ... I assumed that because you came to update us on what she is writing on her forum at present that you did have an interest in it, and had been reading it
I read on here that some one, I think it was John, was asking her to come back on so, having been told what she was up to I thought it would be useful information. No misunderstanding. 8((()*/