Thankyou to the forum

[Admin]

We have her contact details in Canada but she knows very well the concerns that some members have expressed but regardless has chosen to remain silent on here.   

We are aware that she has made comments elsewhere and this will all be taken into consideration.

[icabodcrane]

If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.

I don't really understand what has gone on here,  so feel unable to offer a possible solution

As far as I can tell,  the forum accepted and posted the videos without giving hidiho a  'proviso'  that she would be expected to defend them  ...  'or else'

They have been removed now ...  and that,  I suppose,  is that

I don't see how a member can be expected to defend an opinion   (  or in this case, video )   which is no longer viewable on the forum

Similarly,  I don't see how the responses made to a now unviewable thread can be of any significance to the forum

Show the videos and allow debate   ...  or ban the videos and end debate

Those are the only two credible options,  I think

[gilet]

If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.

I don't really understand what has gone on here,  so feel unable to offer a possible solution

As far as I can tell,  the forum accepted and posted the videos without giving hidiho a  'proviso'  that she would be expected to defend them  ...  'or else'

They have been removed now ...  and that,  I suppose,  is that

I don't see how a member can be expected to defend an opinion   (  or in this case, video )   which is no longer viewable on the forum

Similarly,  I don't see how the responses made to a now unviewable thread can be of any significance to the forum

Show the videos and allow debate   ...  or ban the videos and end debate

Those are the only two credible options,  I think

As I have stated above (and given clear reasons for my opinion), I do not agree with you. Reviews are not simply valid or relevant when read in immediate conjunction with the topic they are reviewing, otherwise newspaper reviews of art exhibitions, theatre productions, books, films and music which millions read and, more importantly, use for information and guidance would simply not exist.

The fact that newspaper reviews exist in every publication and on many blogs and forums proves that they are of real interest to the reader who then may or may not go to find or see whatever was reviewed.   

I notice that you have not responded again with your nonsense that you will not be able to find Hidheho's videos without them being directly linked to. That was clearly an argument too far in your desperate defence of her and your desperate desire to see the reviews banished I suspect.

As for Hideho not being able to defend herself against the reviews without the link being available here, again I find that ridiculous. She would defend the written review in the same way as any other poster defends themself against a post which challenges his or her point of view by writing a response. If she needs to refer to her own video in writing that response I have no doubt that she can find it in her own archive.

[John]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

[Puffin]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere. 

[icabodcrane]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.

I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago  and there was no comment section available  ...  were comments removed again ?

[Puffin]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.

I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago  and there was no comment section available  ...  were comments removed again ?

There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable.  Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content.   I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.

[icabodcrane]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.

I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago  and there was no comment section available  ...  were comments removed again ?

There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable.  Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content.   I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.

I think her forum is on facebook isn't it  ...  so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway  (  not on facebook  )  thanks anyway

Why is it that comments sections are removed   from McCann articles so often do you think  ?  ...  is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck  ?   

[Puffin]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.

I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago  and there was no comment section available  ...  were comments removed again ?

There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable.  Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content.   I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.

I think her forum is on facebook isn't it  ...  so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway  (  not on facebook  )  thanks anyway

Why is it that comments sections are removed   from McCann articles so often do you think  ?  ...  is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck  ?

  I have no interest in her forum so I am unable to state where it is.  As for why comments are removed, having read some of them, no comment.

[icabodcrane]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.

I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago  and there was no comment section available  ...  were comments removed again ?

There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable.  Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content.   I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.

I think her forum is on facebook isn't it  ...  so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway  (  not on facebook  )  thanks anyway

Why is it that comments sections are removed   from McCann articles so often do you think  ?  ...  is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck  ?

  I have no interest in her forum so I am unable to state where it is.  As for why comments are removed, having read some of them, no comment.

oh I'm sorry,  I misunderstood  ...  I assumed that because you came to update us on what she  is writing on her forum at present that you did have an interest in  it, and had been reading it   

[Puffin]

HiDeHO can post at any time in order to take this issue forward.  I hope she does because she has an excellent there and it would be a shame to waste it on bunkum.   

At present she would appear to be too busy copying all the comments re an article on Kate McCann from the Telegraph onto her forum, and being a busy bee elsewhere.

I read the article in the Telegraph a while ago  and there was no comment section available  ...  were comments removed again ?

There were, I believe, over 300 comments; I understand they were removed because some of them were unacceptable.  Personally, I have not read them so I am unable to say anything about their content.   I saw a comment by her somewhere that they were available on her forum and, no, I do not have a link to there, sorry.

I think her forum is on facebook isn't it  ...  so I wouldn't be able to view it anyway  (  not on facebook  )  thanks anyway

Why is it that comments sections are removed   from McCann articles so often do you think  ?  ...  is it a fear of legal action by Carter Ruck  ?

  I have no interest in her forum so I am unable to state where it is.  As for why comments are removed, having read some of them, no comment.

oh I'm sorry,  I misunderstood  ...  I assumed that because you came to update us on what she  is writing on her forum at present that you did have an interest in  it, and had been reading it

I read on here that some one, I think it was John, was asking her to come back on so,  having been told what she was up to I thought it would be useful information.  No misunderstanding.