What questions haven't they answered and who was, asking?

[Mr Gray]

I see an answer, but not to the question asked;

Sandra: Do you still have the support of Mr. Richard Branson, JK Rowling, this multimillionaire that initially gave you a lot of money?

Gerry: (burblegurgle) ..an independent investigation that has been funded completely out of Madeleine's fund... I mean an event like today, there is no specific cost for it, and this is obviously the internet, people already have subscriptions, they can do this. There is the willingness of the population to help and I think we will find hundreds of thousands if not millions of people today will forward this link to their contacts in countries all over the world. That is cheap.
https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/11/gerry-mccann-ask-dogs-sandra.html

So once again Gerry answerred the question but not to your satisfaction... And to SF.... who is very anti mccann imo

[Vertigo Swirl]

So what questions about the events of the evening of May 3rd have they failed to answer?  Surely those are the only questions that really matter, not whether or not Branson is still board...

[Sunny]

So what questions about the events of the evening of May 3rd have they failed to answer?  Surely those are the only questions that really matter, not whether or not Branson is still board...

Which reading the above post Gerry didn't, he appeared to answer another question altogether.

[G-Unit]

No, you carry on dredging the internet for examples of unimportant questions that Gerry McCann didn’t answer to your satisfaction.

One man's meat is another man's poison.

[Vertigo Swirl]

One man's meat is another man's poison.

Hmm...you find it meaty, I find it poisonous, yes a fair summation.

[Robittybob1]

Does anyone have the transcript?  Here it is http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id284.htm

"last message from Gerry with a vital clue:
"GM: That... that... that article that was written, in June, was directly as a result of a journalist phoning all of us and saying: 'what can you tell us about it'. And we were under explicit instructions that we were not to talk about, errr... the details of the case at... under judicial secrecy. So that's all that people did. And, errm... I don't think, you know, there should be considered a pact of silence. We were told, that's what we were to do. And you wouldn't expect witnesses in other cases, in any country, to be going out divulging information that may be useful to the perpetrator of the crime."


You ask yourself what information would be known by the Tapas 9 that would be useful to the perpetrator of this crime?

I'm surprised no one has responded to this.

[Sunny]

There are but I haven't spent days collating them before I made the post on the other thread. They take time to find and unlike you I go out to work and work when I am there too.

Anyway, in the meantime I thought I'd throw in the 48 questions that Kate refused to answer to the PJ. I haven't seen answers to all of these questions.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2500864/Madeleine-McCann-Kate-McCann-refused-to-answer-48-questions-from-Portuguese-police.html

[Mr Gray]

There are but I haven't spent days collating them before I made the post on the other thread. They take time to find and unlike you I go out to work and work when I am there too.

Anyway, in the meantime I thought I'd throw in the 48 questions that Kate refused to answer to the PJ. I haven't seen answers to all of these questions.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2500864/Madeleine-McCann-Kate-McCann-refused-to-answer-48-questions-from-Portuguese-police.html

Not answering the 48 questions has nothing  to do with judicial secrecy

[Vertigo Swirl]

And more to the point how should they have answered them?  Called a press conference with a list of all the questions they’d been asked in the previous year and reeled off the answers? In fact Kate’s book answers many of the questions, but the fact is some people don’t like or believe the answers.

[Sunny]

Are you both on phones where you can't do links?

Sorry RObittybob1 but I am fed up with Davel not providing cites.

Here is mine. (I can't post from my phone so I only post when I have access to a PC).

I will have a look Robittybob1.  I did mention that the questions were asked before they were "cleared" -which they were not it seems now and that they used judicial secrecy to refuse to answer them. They then didn't answer these questions after the police investigation was closed.

One that springs to mind is this one.

SF "Did you know Robert Murat"

GM "I'm not going to comment on that"

Why not say no?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10000.msg480544#msg480544

I hope this is right I am not used to doing this.

[Robittybob1]

Sorry RObittybob1 but I am fed up with Davel not providing cites.

Here is mine. (I can't post from my phone so I only post when I have access to a PC).

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10000.msg480544#msg480544

I hope this is right I am not used to doing this.

Looking at the date that the video was published it was either in Portugal before or in England after they returned  but they would have still been arguidos at the time.

[Mr Gray]

Sorry RObittybob1 but I am fed up with Davel not providing cites.

Here is mine. (I can't post from my phone so I only post when I have access to a PC).

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10000.msg480544#msg480544

I hope this is right I am not used to doing this.

You said questions... You have found one very insignificant question.. Any more to make it two

[Sunny]

You said questions... You have found one very insignificant question.. Any more to make it two

Who are you to say whether a question is "insignificant" or not. Murat was the third arguido in the case.  I consider your posts to be goading.

[Robittybob1]

Why did Gerry not say if he knew RM?

[John]

Why did Gerry not say if he knew RM?

An extremely valid question which deserved a simple answer.  If I recall correctly, there was a claim by video maker Richard D Hall to the effect that GM and RM had met at some golf club prior to Madeleine's disappearance but in true form fails to provide any proof for such a claim.