Author Topic: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?  (Read 62181 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Sunny

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #120 on: October 10, 2018, 04:44:36 PM »
I would have thought each individual country would have to agree...

The terms in accordance with which a JIT operates vary from case to case, but they are based on the model JIT agreement as appended to Council Resolution (2017/C 18/01). This resolution “encourages the competent authorities of the Member States that wish to set up a Joint Investigation Team with the competent authorities from other Member States, in accordance with the terms of the Framework Decision and the Convention, or from non-EU States, on the basis of the relevant international instruments, to use, where appropriate, the Model Agreement […] in order to agree upon the modalities for the joint investigation team”.




looks like Im correct...no will...no way

Do you know of any examples where the UK has allowed another EU member state JIT status within our own country, particularly if the crime was wholly within the UK, Davel?  I can't find any.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #121 on: October 10, 2018, 04:50:41 PM »
I would have thought each individual country would have to agree...

The terms in accordance with which a JIT operates vary from case to case, but they are based on the model JIT agreement as appended to Council Resolution (2017/C 18/01). This resolution “encourages the competent authorities of the Member States that wish to set up a Joint Investigation Team with the competent authorities from other Member States, in accordance with the terms of the Framework Decision and the Convention, or from non-EU States, on the basis of the relevant international instruments, to use, where appropriate, the Model Agreement […] in order to agree upon the modalities for the joint investigation team”.





looks like Im correct...no will...no way
2017 is how many years too late?
« Last Edit: October 10, 2018, 06:23:02 PM by ShiningInLuz »
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #122 on: October 10, 2018, 05:11:14 PM »
Do you know of any examples where the UK has allowed another EU member state JIT status within our own country, particularly if the crime was wholly within the UK, Davel?  I can't find any.

are there any examples where its been requested....Im fairly sure SY officers have travelled to other countries

Obviously  JIT status would be very helpful to SYs investigation... But is the PJ resentful
« Last Edit: October 10, 2018, 05:19:37 PM by Davel »

Offline Alice Purjorick

"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #124 on: October 10, 2018, 05:32:27 PM »
are there any examples where its been requested....Im fairly sure SY officers have travelled to other countries

Obviously  JIT status would be very helpful to SYs investigation... But is the PJ resentful

What makes you think that SY would have lead the JIT had one been set up?
Why did not SY ask for one?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #125 on: October 10, 2018, 05:43:37 PM »
What makes you think that SY would have lead the JIT had one been set up?
Why did not SY ask for one?
A JIT is a contract for cooperation ....meaning no Ilors necessary.......we dont know if one was asked for or if the portuguese refused....it would seem sensible from the point of view of SY

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #126 on: October 10, 2018, 05:58:18 PM »
A JIT is a contract for cooperation ....meaning no Ilors necessary.......we dont know if one was asked for or if the portuguese refused....it would seem sensible from the point of view of SY

Except the leaders of the JIT would be the Portuguese.

"The team is set up inthe Member State in which investigations are expected to be predominantly
carried out".

"Article 13 of the 2000 MLA Convention provides that: "... the leader of the team shall be a
representative of the competent authority participating in criminal investigations from the Member
State in which the team operates".
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #127 on: October 10, 2018, 06:04:11 PM »
Except the leaders of the JIT would be the Portuguese.

"The team is set up inthe Member State in which investigations are expected to be predominantly
carried out".

"Article 13 of the 2000 MLA Convention provides that: "... the leader of the team shall be a
representative of the competent authority participating in criminal investigations from the Member
State in which the team operates".


Of course.....but no need for Ilors......the question is did the portuguese or SY want it

Offline misty

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #128 on: October 10, 2018, 07:11:58 PM »
Except the leaders of the JIT would be the Portuguese.

"The team is set up inthe Member State in which investigations are expected to be predominantly
carried out".

"Article 13 of the 2000 MLA Convention provides that: "... the leader of the team shall be a
representative of the competent authority participating in criminal investigations from the Member
State in which the team operates".


IMO a JIT would have been detrimental to what SY were trying to achieve. There certainly would have been difficulty without an ILOR for re-questioning people who had already been "ruled out" by the original PJ team. It would also have provided the opportunity for further leaks, with each side blaming the other.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #129 on: October 10, 2018, 07:28:49 PM »
IMO a JIT would have been detrimental to what SY were trying to achieve. There certainly would have been difficulty without an ILOR for re-questioning people who had already been "ruled out" by the original PJ team. It would also have provided the opportunity for further leaks, with each side blaming the other.

I couldn't agree more. With the Portuguese in the lead they could have requested SY to do all sorts of things they would rather not have.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #130 on: October 10, 2018, 07:32:33 PM »
I couldn't agree more. With the Portuguese in the lead they could have requested SY to do all sorts of things they would rather not have.

tHen dont blame SY for apparent lack of progress when they have no ability to investiagte
« Last Edit: October 10, 2018, 07:37:30 PM by Davel »

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #131 on: October 10, 2018, 07:40:52 PM »
tHen dont blame SY for apparent lack of progress when they have no ability to investiagte
What were the arguido interviews in July 2014?  And the witness interviews in Dec 2014?

 &^^&*
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #132 on: October 10, 2018, 07:44:24 PM »
What were the arguido interviews in July 2014?  And the witness interviews in Dec 2014?

 &^^&*

a list of questions ...submited 6 months previously with no opprtunity to follow up...without anothe ILor

Offline Sunny

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #133 on: October 10, 2018, 07:44:51 PM »
What were the arguido interviews in July 2014?  And the witness interviews in Dec 2014?

 &^^&*

Who took the dogs into Praia Da Luz too?
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
« Reply #134 on: October 10, 2018, 07:47:10 PM »
Who took the dogs into Praia Da Luz too?

and.....the dogs were offered and the PJ accepted...problem was the PJ thought they were 100% accurate