Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?

[G-Unit]

I said there was evidence...there is..I'm right
You said there wasn't....you are wrong

What I said was that the evidence didn't support your conclusions.

[Mr Gray]

What I said was that the evidence didn't support your conclusions.

You said there was no evidence...the post is still there...that makes you wrong again...post ,248

[G-Unit]

You said there was no evidence...the post is still there...that makes you wrong again...post ,248

Would you care to reproduce the complete post rather than just the bit you chose?

You said police don't investigate those who they say aren't suspects and you were wrong. 

[Mr Gray]

Despite your claim, there's no evidence that the NcCanns are not being investigated and no evidence that they are.

No evidence

[Mr Gray]

Would you care to reproduce the complete post rather than just the bit you chose?

You said police don't investigate those who they say aren't suspects and you were wrong. 

Could you reproduce the whole post...as you requested I do

[xtina]

You said there was no evidence...the post is still there...that makes you wrong again...post ,248

I think the DNA results are very confusing and can't be taken as absolutely conclusive....

GA regretted ever sending them to the Birmingham lab

Stuart Prior... did say the results of the test in England.... arrests would have been made.....

Is that why SY chose to skip all the bits that could implicate the mccs...

So started with the abduction as if everything pointed to that ...which it didn't....

it amazes me how pj are continually slagged of as not investigating properly...

yet praised that they did not class the mccs as suspects...

There is so much going on in this case....

the only thing clear it seems is the mccs have to be innocent at all costs....

maddie is left and justice for her.... way back in 2007...just as she was left that fateful night....

my post is in my opinion....

Interesting read imo


http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/11/fss-its-maddies-blood.html

[G-Unit]

No evidence

Do you have evidence showing what the police are doing? I think not.

[Mr Gray]

Do you have evidence showing what the police are doing? I think not.

Ive quoted it

[Mr Gray]

I think the DNA results are very confusing and can't be taken as absolutely conclusive....

GA regretted ever sending them to the Birmingham lab

Stuart Prior... did say the results of the test in England.... arrests would have been made.....

Is that why SY chose to skip all the bits that could implicate the mccs...

So started with the abduction as if everything pointed to that ...which it didn't....

it amazes me how pj are continually slagged of as not investigating properly...

yet praised that they did not class the mccs as suspects...

There is so much going on in this case....

the only thing clear it seems is the mccs have to be innocent at all costs....

maddie is left and justice for her.... way back in 2007...just as she was left that fateful night....

my post is in my opinion....

Interesting read imo


http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/11/fss-its-maddies-blood.html

What is the evidence Prior made that statement....only amaral......amaral who claimed the dogs had helped solve 200 case searches....amaras claims are full of errors as is easily proved. He misunderstood the dna so he has to blame someone else

[Mr Gray]

I think the DNA results are very confusing and can't be taken as absolutely conclusive....

GA regretted ever sending them to the Birmingham lab

Stuart Prior... did say the results of the test in England.... arrests would have been made.....

Is that why SY chose to skip all the bits that could implicate the mccs...

So started with the abduction as if everything pointed to that ...which it didn't....

it amazes me how pj are continually slagged of as not investigating properly...

yet praised that they did not class the mccs as suspects...

There is so much going on in this case....

the only thing clear it seems is the mccs have to be innocent at all costs....

maddie is left and justice for her.... way back in 2007...just as she was left that fateful night....

my post is in my opinion....

Interesting read imo


http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/11/fss-its-maddies-blood.html

the dna results are not confusing..they are very clear and conclusive

[ShiningInLuz]

W ithout a cite your post is worthless...as you are in Portugal a simple Google check may well give different results to that in the UK

No cite...so no evidence of any activity in Porto

I use google.co.uk

Please don't insinuate that I am lying.

If you are too lazy to do a tiny bit of simple research, so be it, your views are worthless.

[Mr Gray]

I use google.co.uk

Please don't insinuate that I am lying.

If you are too lazy to do a tiny bit of simple research, so be it, your views are worthless.

I am telling you that you are clearly wrong...there has been no sign of any action from porto and a simple google search does not show any...you can settle this easily by citing your result...the fact is you cannot as you are mistaken

[Sunny]

I use google.co.uk

Please don't insinuate that I am lying.

If you are too lazy to do a tiny bit of simple research, so be it, your views are worthless.

I believe some posters constant refrain that others do not understand the evidence but that they of course do, should be against forum rules.  At the very least it is irritating and clearly wrong.

[xtina]

What is the evidence Prior made that statement....only amaral......amaral who claimed the dogs had helped solve 200 case searches....amaras claims are full of errors as is easily proved. He misunderstood the dna so he has to blame someone else

Oh lol,.... he is not the only one whos claims are full of errors...

At least,... in my opinion,.... he stuck to the one conclusion he made..

Not like some who changed the story to fit...

also, ...blame everyone but themselves.....

[Mr Gray]

I believe some posters constant refrain that others do not understand the evidence but that they of course do, should be against forum rules.  At the very least it is irritating and clearly wrong.

why when its opinion based on fact.....xtina claimed Prior made a statement ....which I dont believe he did...and there is little evidence to support it....she claims the DNA evidence is not conclusive and confusing when it is quite simple to understand...sil claims there is action in porto..as  afact..but refuses to provide a cite...all my criticisms are justified