Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I was discussing the PJ, whether you were aware of it or not. I believe Operation Grange are investigating an abduction 'as if it occurred in the UK' and have been doing so for years. They may have deleted all the evidence from their website, but it still exists elsewhere.

Well I was discussing “the police”, and when would you accept that they aren’t investigating the McCanns.  It appears we have made some progress as you seem to be accepting that the active part of the investigation (ie the Met) are NOT investigating the McCanns.  Now, what evidence is there that the PJ are investigating them instead?  Nothing.

[faithlilly]

You have changed “police” to “PJ” now, I see.   Yes De Carmo’s statement is certainly one of the pieces of evidence.  What’s your view of Colon Sutton?  Is he a liar?
 'The Scotland Yard investigation was going to be very narrowly focused and that focus would be away from any suspicion of wrongdoing on the part of the McCanns or the tapas friends.'

As one who purports to support Madeleine why would you want the investigation not to at least look at the parents even if it was to eliminate them ?

[Mr Gray]

As one who purports to support Madeleine why would you want the investigation not to at least look at the parents even if it was to eliminate them ?

I'm more than happy for SY to look at the McCanns and believe bthey have

[ShiningInLuz]

As one who purports to support Madeleine why would you want the investigation not to at least look at the parents even if it was to eliminate them ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

As one who purports to support Madeleine why would you want the investigation not to at least look at the parents even if it was to eliminate them ?

The McCanns have been thoroughly investigated already - by the PJ who found no evidence against them.  Do you think the PJ didn’t do a good enough job the first time round?  What else is there to investigate as far as the parents are concerned?  Put yourself in charge of Op Grange and tell me what specific actions you would have taken to eliminate the McCanns?

[faithlilly]

I'm more than happy for SY to look at the McCanns and believe bthey have

So you disbelieve what Rowley said about the PJ dealing with the parents guilt in the Portuguese investigation ?

[faithlilly]

The McCanns have been thoroughly investigated already - by the PJ who found no evidence against them.  Do you think the PJ didn’t do a good enough job the first time round?  What else is there to investigate as far as the parents are concerned?  Put yourself in charge of Op Grange and tell me what specific actions you would have taken to eliminate the McCanns?

I think it has been made clear by the SC that the archiving report didn’t clear the parents.

[G-Unit]

All your opinion again. It's not an assumption that no one has evidence of action by the pj...it's a fact....you really are struggling

I'm struggling? You've got your own assumption in the wrong place!

There's no evidence that the PJ are acting. FACT
Therefore they are not acting. ASSUMPTION.

[Mr Gray]

So you disbelieve what Rowley said about the PJ dealing with the parents guilt in the Portuguese investigation ?

No...I believe SY have looked at all the evidence and are happy with it...I believe they have interviewed the parents re what happened and found nothing suspicious

[Alice Purjorick]

The McCanns have been thoroughly investigated already - by the PJ who found no evidence against them.  Do you think the PJ didn’t do a good enough job the first time round?  What else is there to investigate as far as the parents are concerned? Put yourself in charge of Op Grange and tell me what specific actions you would have taken to eliminate the McCanns?

How would you know whether the response was correct or otherwise.
Are you a policeman or of allied trade?

[Mr Gray]

I think it has been made clear by the SC that the archiving report didn’t clear the parents.

Neither have the Needham family been cleared...it's a pointless .. point

[Mr Gray]

I'm struggling? You've got your own assumption in the wrong place!

There's no evidence that the PJ are acting. FACT
Therefore they are not acting. ASSUMPTION.

There is no evidence the pj are acting... conclusion based on the available evidence

[faithlilly]

No...I believe SY have looked at all the evidence and are happy with it...I believe they have interviewed the parents re what happened and found nothing suspicious

But that’s not what a Rowley said. Are you second guessing him?

[Mr Gray]

But that’s not what a Rowley said. Are you second guessing him?

Apart from whether the McCann's have been interviewed it is what he said.....and I would be very surprised if the McCann's have not been reinterviewed as witnesses

[faithlilly]

Apart from whether the McCann's have been interviewed it is what he said.....and I would be very surprised if the McCann's have not been reintervirwed as witnesses

But, apart from your incredulity, you have no evidence to believe that they have been interviewed, have you ?