Author Topic: Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.  (Read 196767 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

one thing that comes out is how the PJ leaked information to Sandra Figuerras...and how she came to realise the PJ had lied to her...she confirms that the original FSS report ...which was in english...when translated for the pj only composed the first paragraph...missing out the caveats.......I cant be accused of PJ bashing...Sandra is doing it

Offline Wonderfulspam

Just watching Episode 5.

« Last Edit: March 15, 2019, 08:54:42 PM by Brietta »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

he mentioned the sailing incident...but not the day it happened...are you suggesting hes lying

According to the McCanns et al and Cat Baker it was Thursday morning. It's oerfectly possible that he forgot it was the day she disappeared. It was planned for Wednesday but apparently it was changed. Did he mention Madeleine jumping or falling in by the way? Did anyone else?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

The sceptics don’t appear to be too impressed by this Netflix series, certainly not as impressed as they seem to be by Mark Unpronounceable’s podcasts.  Can’t imagine why that should be.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

According to the McCanns et al and Cat Baker it was Thursday morning. It's oerfectly possible that he forgot it was the day she disappeared. It was planned for Wednesday but apparently it was changed. Did he mention Madeleine jumping or falling in by the way? Did anyone else?
So he made it up, is that your opinion?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

According to the McCanns et al and Cat Baker it was Thursday morning. It's oerfectly possible that he forgot it was the day she disappeared. It was planned for Wednesday but apparently it was changed. Did he mention Madeleine jumping or falling in by the way? Did anyone else?

What would his motive be for lying.. He is either speaking the truth as he remembers or is lying

Offline Mr Gray

We have been told on this forum that Grime was pressured into his caveats on the alerts.. I think that's total BS... Harison said the same.... And now on this documentary Grime has, repeated his caveats... You don't need to be a dog to detect BS

Offline G-Unit

So he made it up, is that your opinion?

I find your posting style quite strange. You begin by suggesting I said or thought something I didn't say or think, then ask me if your syggestion is correct. As it's your suggestion I suggest you answer it instead of asking me.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

If he remembers the truth incorrectly, then he can be mistaken... that's not lying. Gerry done just that on May 4th you'll remember.

That's why I used the caveat... As he remembers... It's unlikely.. Do you not think... That he would have imagined Maddie rescuing his daughters hat at the sailing day... It's not unlikely he might forget exactly what day it was

Offline Vertigo Swirl

The Pj’s treatment of Sergey Malinka was absolutely appalling IMO.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I find your posting style quite strange. You begin by suggesting I said or thought something I didn't say or think, then ask me if your syggestion is correct. As it's your suggestion I suggest you answer it instead of asking me.
I find your posting style quite insinuating and very evasive.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

It's rather difficult to comprehend that this Netflix production which is reported to have costs millions, give's us DNA experts Jim Gamble and Robin Swan to explain the DNA evidence. What qualifications have Jim Gamble and Robin Swan got in genetic science.
 &%%6

It was explained by the experts at the FSS.. Robin Swan has simply explained their findings in simpler terms... She seems to understand  it far better than amaral

Offline faithlilly

Jim Gamble and Robin Swan explaining the genetic results, come on be serious.
Some folk are easier to satisfy than others. Jim Gamble and Robin Swan @)(++(*

Summers and wife might just as well have read straight from Kate’s book for all the objectivity they show. Thankfully their pieces to camera are balanced by others contributions.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline John

I just watched episode 1 & almost lapsed into a coma.

At the start of episode 2, one commentator describes Madeleine as 'a very attractive little girl'.

Who in their right mind finds a 3 year old 'attractive'?!

Just about to watch it so not holding my breath as regards any major breakthrough.  8(8-))

Has anyone reached the end yet?
« Last Edit: March 15, 2019, 10:24:36 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

I don't know what he would have imagined, but if Gerry can imagine the last time he seen his daughter alive incorrectly, which he did on May 4th, right?  Then I don't see how he can't imagine what day it was incorrectly, do you? Don't you think Gerry's imagination proves it's possible to imagine things incorrectly, or was he lying?

Well he did get completely wrong the location of the chat with Jez and also the door he used on the 9pm check.  Could he have been inebriated?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.