Author Topic: Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.  (Read 196697 times)

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Did the sceptics miss where Sandra Figuerras exposed the PJ as a bunch of liars

You think this is something new?  Cops liars?   @)(++(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

so you dont think Sandra F telling s the PJ lied to her and their intentions were not honest...thatbthey misunderstoofd the forensics because they only translated the first paragraph....i think thats new information

Haven't reached that part yet...going to watch episode 4 now.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Is that it then, $20 million dollars down the drain for this?  Have they not made any determination as to what really happened or as I suspect they are afraid of potential litigation?

I think they showed the evidence against the mccanns was zIlCH...they showed amaral as a very poor cop who doesnt mind suspects being beaten...they considered the evidence in the cipriano case very poor...

they are there to present evidence...not to judge..
i think many are disappointed because it supported the MccAnns

Offline Mr Gray

You think this is something new?  Cops liars?   @)(++(*

Its something new for Sandra to be so pro mccanns and so anti the PJ

Offline G-Unit

The details of the incident are irrelevant.
The fact is that Madeleine was alive and well on this day.
It does rather put paid to the nonsense of the researcher's nonsense on CMOMM.
But then nonsense it always was!

You sound like Dave Edgar, he wasn't a detail person either. How can Madeleine going into the sea be irrelevant? In my opinion it requires clarification if a child went overboard during that sailing exercise. I would have thought a teacher would agree.

Did you think CMOMM were right? I never did, so I didn't need Berry to debunk it.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2019, 05:53:17 PM by John »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Erngath

You sound like Dave Edgar, he wasn't a detail person either. How can Madeleine going into the sea be irrelevant? In my opinion it requires clarification if a child went overboard during that sailing exercise. I would have thought a teacher would agree.

Did you think CMOMM were right? I never did, so I didn't need Berry to debunk it.

Do I sound like Dave Edgar?
Is that a compliment?

Why the need to be so personal?
Just to reassure you that if a pupil of mine had "gone into the sea", there would certainly have been a very detailed report logged

I never suspected for one moment that you would ever believe the nonsense on CMOMM.
I credit you with far more intelligence than to believe such rubbish.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2019, 05:54:27 PM by John »
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

You sound like Dave Edgar, he wasn't a detail person either. How can Madeleine going into the sea be irrelevant? In my opinion it requires clarification if a child went overboard during that sailing exercise. I would have thought a teacher would agree.

Did you think CMOMM were right? I never did, so I didn't need Berry to debunk it.

i dont think a child went overboard.....you claim you never thoght CMOMM were right...yet you have praised them as agood source of information
« Last Edit: March 16, 2019, 05:54:56 PM by John »

Offline misty

You sound like Dave Edgar, he wasn't a detail person either. How can Madeleine going into the sea be irrelevant? In my opinion it requires clarification if a child went overboard during that sailing exercise. I would have thought a teacher would agree.

Did you think CMOMM were right? I never did, so I didn't need Berry to debunk it.

If Madeleine had actually jumped into the sea, wouldn't she have lost her own hat?
« Last Edit: March 16, 2019, 05:55:20 PM by John »

Offline Erngath

If Madeleine had actually jumped into the sea, wouldn't she have lost her own hat?

If she had fallen overboard, the whole incident would surely have had to be recorded.
Unless the safety procedures were utterly abysmal.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline misty

If she had fallen overboard, the whole incident would surely have had to be recorded.
Unless the safety procedures were utterly abysmal.

No formal statements were taken from either Alice Stanley or Chris Unsworth, the two sailing instructors - so presumably their accident records weren't checked.

Offline Erngath

No formal statements were taken from either Alice Stanley or Chris Unsworth, the two sailing instructors - so presumably their accident records weren't checked.

I haven't viewed the Netflix series yet, did Madeleine retrieve the other little girls hat?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline John

I apologise if my previous reply was not appropriate, that was not it's intention, I'll soon learn. But if you got the chance to read it, I am sure you'll have noticed that I have fully considered that he may have been inebriated.  Given that level of consideration, I can't help thinking if he got to the tapas after having a beer shortly before half eight and done his check at a little after nine, I fail to see how he could have possibly have got inebriated enough in that short time to remember the truth about the last time he seen his daughter incorrectly. Don't you feel after careful consideration, the idea that he remembered the truth about his check incorrectly because he was so inebriated, is a little far fetched? A critical point that was completely ignored by the film imo.
Again, I apoligise to everyone, but not for the level of consideration I have given your perfectly reasonable point, I am only sorry I posted it.
Some considerations are best kept to oneself, I understand that now.

I was considering the possibility that his powers of recollection had been impaired.  To get two such basic facts wrong the night the child disappeared is very odd IMO.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

I agree, she didn't sound well pleased with the PJ at all and who am I to question her.
But she didn't say she followed them around every day, and I wonder what makes think her think people dispose of bodies during the day. Night time when it's dark seems the logical time for that kind of thing to me.

She was very happy to make a few Euros on the back of PJ cooperation.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline misty

I haven't viewed the Netflix series yet, did Madeleine retrieve the other little girls hat?

It's not confirmed one way or the other. The whole incident was the recollection of 4 year old J Berry so may not be entirely accurate.

Offline Erngath

It's not confirmed one way or the other. The whole incident was the recollection of 4 year old J Berry so may not be entirely accurate.

Thank you.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.