Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

[Mr Gray]

I don't suppose they had in-depth knowledge of the case. All they knew was that opinion is divided and they id reflect that imo.

Facts aren't all they are made out to be... It's possible to present facts in such avway to prove a fallacy as the PJ did..
Fact... The DNA in the boot matched 15 of maddies 19 markers... That fact could be... And has been presented as proof that maddies, DNA was in the boot....that's a fallacy

[Erngath]

For the first four or five hours it was.

Yes, after the first five episodes it soon became clear that as far as this programme was concerned the McCanns were not involved in Madeleine's disappearance.
That's when many sceptics decided to watch no more!!

[Vertigo Swirl]

No.

Then it wasn't balanced between the sceptic and the supporter opinions was it?

[faithlilly]

Yes, after the first five episodes it soon became clear that as far as this programme was concerned the McCanns were not involved in Madeleine's disappearance.
That's when many sceptics decided to watch no more!!

That’s a shame. To have a balanced opinion of the series you have to watch it all.

I really don’t understand individuals who don’t read, watch or listen to things that don’t chime with their views. It’s comfortable  to have your view affirmed, less so to have them challenged but so much more constructive.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That’s a shame. To have a balanced opinion of the series you have to watch it all.

I really don’t understand individuals who don’t read, watch or listen to things that don’t chime with their views. It’s comfortable  to have your view affirmed, less so to have them challenged but so much more constructive.

You hate having your views challenged though...?

[G-Unit]

Facts aren't all they are made out to be... It's possible to present facts in such avway to prove a fallacy as the PJ did..
Fact... The DNA in the boot matched 15 of maddies 19 markers... That fact could be... And has been presented as proof that maddies, DNA was in the boot....that's a fallacy

The results were inconclusive. That means the FSS didn't know.

[ShiningInLuz]

As I said, equally balanced. Most of it was a repeat of people's opinions, but it did provide a couple of interesting pieces of information.

True.   

[G-Unit]

Then it wasn't balanced between the sceptic and the supporter opinions was it?

Sorry, I misread your post (flipping cateract). I don't think they reached a conclusion.

[faithlilly]

The results were inconclusive. That means the FSS didn't know.

Even if they had been conclusive what would that have proven ? That Madeleine had been in the apartment and could have bled ? That clothes of Madeleine’s had been carried in the car ? For me the DNA is a total red herring.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Sorry, I misread your post (flipping cateract). I don't think they reached a conclusion.

That doesn't seem to be the opinion of most sceptic comments I have read thus far.  There have even some suggesting that the McCanns were secretly behind the documentary, such is the paranoia and conspiracy madness in certain quarters....

[Mr Gray]

The results were inconclusive. That means the FSS didn't know.

The results give a conclusion and are therefore conclusive....that is it is impossible to say if maddies dna was recovered from the boot...of that there is absolutely no doubt.

Reading the report teh FSS were asked a question....was Maddies dna recovered from teh boot...its impossible to say...its inconclusive...

i was making the point that facts can look to prove something when its not true...i think you missed that point

[Mr Gray]

As I said, equally balanced. Most of it was a repeat of people's opinions, but it did provide a couple of interesting pieces of information.

It also provided some facts....that the PJ did not read the whole of the preliminary report...thats why they misunderstood teh FSS.....imo....and tahts why amarl stated teh FSS manipulated the results,,...there is no evidence they did...there is proof amarals opinion is based on his own failings

[G-Unit]

That doesn't seem to be the opinion of most sceptic comments I have read thus far.  There have even some suggesting that the McCanns were secretly behind the documentary, such is the paranoia and conspiracy madness in certain quarters....

I don't care what 'most sceptics' say. I belong to a group of  just three; me, myself and I. I think my pem thoughts and form my own opinions. .

[G-Unit]

It also provided some facts....that the PJ did not read the whole of the preliminary report...thats why they misunderstood teh FSS.....imo....and tahts why amarl stated teh FSS manipulated the results,,...there is no evidence they did...there is proof amarals opinion is based on his own failings

Did he confirm Sandra's accusation?

[Mr Gray]

I don't care what 'most sceptics' say. I belong to a group of  just three; me, myself and I. I think my pem thoughts and form my own opinions. .

You are no less, part of group than anyone who comments here... Even if you don't like it