Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

[ShiningInLuz]

Having now watched the final two episodes I find it hard to believe that ANYONE watching could come away with  any other view than that the programme makers believe Maddie had been abducted by a stranger.   It is thoroughly sympathetic towards the McCanns.

ANYONE who knows the case would know that Pulse Films is based in the UK, that Netflix is based in the US, and that the McCanns threatened litigation if the contents did not meet their expectation.

It wasn't balanced.

It was constrained.   

[Mr Gray]

ANYONE who knows the case would know that Pulse Films is based in the UK, that Netflix is based in the US, and that the McCanns threatened litigation if the contents did not meet their expectation.

It wasn't balanced.

It was constrained.   

That's your opinion... The fact that they have to abide by libel laws means they can only present a film based on evidence and cannot accuse people of crimes if those claims are not based on evidence... So constrained by the evidence would be more accurate... I don't see anything wrong with that

[Erngath]

ANYONE who knows the case would know that Pulse Films is based in the UK, that Netflix is based in the US, and that the McCanns threatened litigation if the contents did not meet their expectation.

It wasn't balanced.

It was constrained.   

Not constrained enough to stop Amaral repeating his claims!

[Mr Gray]

ANYONE who knows the case would know that Pulse Films is based in the UK, that Netflix is based in the US, and that the McCanns threatened litigation if the contents did not meet their expectation.

It wasn't balanced.

It was constrained.   

You seem to be getting carried further away and now think you can speak for... ANYONE... how bizarre


And of course that's all your opinion posted as fact

The mccanns did not threaten legal action if the programme did not ...meet their expectations... Cite required

[Lace]

They didn’t. That’s exactly the reaction you’d expect from a couple who had just lost their child. Jayne Jensen, another holidaymaker, said that the only time she had ever heard wailing like Kate’s was after two of her relatives had died.

As Jayne Jensen as never heard how parents of a missing child react,   she likened it to something she was familiar with the death of two of her relatives.

Good to see you agree they weren't faking their distress.

[ShiningInLuz]

You seem to be getting carried further away and now think you can speak for... ANYONE... how bizarre


And of course that's all your opinion posted as fact

The mccanns did not threaten legal action if the programme did not ...meet their expectations... Cite required

My reply quoted Verti S who said that ANYONE must come away with 'stranger abduction'.  Absolute cobblers.

By the way, I am civil to those who are civil to me.  But I am not a Christian, so I feel no obligation to turn the other cheek, when that poster thinks a goad per post is about average.

[Mr Gray]

My reply quoted Verti S who said that ANYONE must come away with 'stranger abduction'.  Absolute cobblers.

By the way, I am civil to those who are civil to me.  But I am not a Christian, so I feel no obligation to turn the other cheek, when that poster thinks a goad per post is about average.

second request...cite for your untruth that the Mccanns threatened litigatgion if the film did not...meet their expectations...your claim is absurd

[faithlilly]

As Jayne Jensen as never heard how parents of a missing child react,   she likened it to something she was familiar with the death of two of her relatives.

Good to see you agree they weren't faking their distress.

I never claimed they were.

[faithlilly]

second request...cite for your untruth that the Mccanns threatened litigatgion if the film did not...meet their expectations...your claim is absurd

You are correct, it was the usual ‘source’ who claimed this though we should know by now the parent’s preference for distancing themselves from any comment by use of a ‘source’.

[Mr Gray]

You are correct, it was the usual ‘source’ who claimed this though we should know by now the parent’s preference for distancing themselves from any comment by use of a ‘source’.

The words... Meet their expectations... Wasn't used by anyone... Again you haven't got the facts right

[G-Unit]

The McCann's were happily eating their meal,  laughing and joking,   then at about 10o'clock, Kate finds Madeleine missing.   The McCann's were then reduced to quivering wrecks,  screaming,  sobbing   Gerry on the floor crying uncontrollably,  his friends described him as strong,  the Police as cold,  yet here he was crying in a heap on the floor,   terrible scene they said.  Kate screaming lashing out howling with pain.    Please tell me how they could fake this IMO

I'm sure the emotions were genuine. I'm not sure about the underlying cause of that emotion.

[Mr Gray]

perhaps you or faith could explain why you see ...meet their expectations ......is equivalent to...if you libel us..


that isnt semantics thats being accurate.....you claim to be investigating the case...unless you can get basic facts right you are makeing something of a fool of yourself

[G-Unit]

Robbyn Swan spoke about the DNA resullts. She agreed with me that until 4th September they had nothing from the FSS. She goes further and asserts that when they interviewed the McCanns two days later they omly had a very basic summary. This is what Ricardo Paiva said on 14th Swptember;

The partial results of those forensic analyses were being communicated to this Police force by Detective Superintendent Stuart Prior, member of the Leicestershire Police legation, through e-mails originating in that laboratory and from a partial Forensic Report dated 07 August 2007.[I think he meant 7th September. The samples wern't collected until the end of August]
--- However, it was verified that due to error by that laboratory, in the cited Forensic Report there exist inconsitencies with that previously reported by a forensic specialist in the e-mails received by Superintendent Stuart Prior, the reason for which, it was by the English authorities, suggested that it is awaited for the Final Report of the laboratory, to be delivered to this Police force upon the conclusion of the laboratorial forensic analyses that presently are still in execution.

[Mr Gray]

Robbyn Swan spoke about the DNA resullts. She agreed with me that until 4th September they had nothing from the FSS. She goes further and asserts that when they interviewed the McCanns two days later they omly had a very basic summary. This is what Ricardo Paiva said on 14th Swptember;

The partial results of those forensic analyses were being communicated to this Police force by Detective Superintendent Stuart Prior, member of the Leicestershire Police legation, through e-mails originating in that laboratory and from a partial Forensic Report dated 07 August 2007.[I think he meant 7th September. The samples wern't collected until the end of August]
--- However, it was verified that due to error by that laboratory, in the cited Forensic Report there exist inconsitencies with that previously reported by a forensic specialist in the e-mails received by Superintendent Stuart Prior, the reason for which, it was by the English authorities, suggested that it is awaited for the Final Report of the laboratory, to be delivered to this Police force upon the conclusion of the laboratorial forensic analyses that presently are still in execution.

You are quoting the PJ... Hardly unbiased

[faithlilly]

You are quoting the PJ... Hardly unbiased

As are the parents claims.