Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

[G-Unit]

Don't worry. I didn't mind it at the start, and I don't mind it now.

My cadaver dog, Gonçalo, is quite timid.  A small, old village scruffbag half his size saw him off this morning.  Gonk scruffled back home and we walked around the campo.

Our youngsters own Sky, a Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and I am much more like her.  She is very civil to other dogs that are civil to her.  If the other dogs get aggressive only Sky is going to win.

 

Our Staffie was just like that. Never aggressive but if another dog started anything she finished it. She warned them first, but if they took no notice she would act.

[Erngath]

She’s only 15 ? That explains it. 15 year olds believe that even the relationships in Love Island are real.

You do have a very low opinion of fifteen year olds.
She doesn't watch the rubbish you mention.
She is a very mature, intelligent fifteen year old who is presently studying entuhusiastically in preparation for her National Five exams.
I do hope this post is not too convoluted for you and that you have no problem understanding it.

[G-Unit]

There is nothing about the Portuguese dog search in the files except for the Dog handler's statements.
Even Kate doesn't put much emphasis on this in her book.

According to GNR officer Lacao he was given the pink blanket for his patrol dog to sniff at about 2.30am on 4th. Kate has no memory of when this was, she gives the inpression it was much later.

She says that according to the files the tracker dogs went out at 11pm on 4th. They did, with a bath towel they must have got from her or her husband, but she doesn't mention that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

She’s only 15 ? That explains it. 15 year olds believe that even the relationships in Love Island are real.

You make gross generalizations about the young, you sneer at the old, what age does someone have to be to have a valid opinion about this case, in your view?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Don't worry. I didn't mind it at the start, and I don't mind it now.

My cadaver dog, Gonçalo, is quite timid.  A small, old village scruffbag half his size saw him off this morning.  Gonk scruffled back home and we walked around the campo.

Our youngsters own Sky, a Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and I am much more like her.  She is very civil to other dogs that are civil to her.  If the other dogs get aggressive only Sky is going to win.

 

I bet Sky doesn’t incorrectly paraphrase people on internet forums though.  I think I would prefer to discuss things with her in future, she probably makes more sense.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Anyway, to get back on track I will reiterate my earlier point that I find it hard to believe that anyone would view the Netflix documentary as anything other than completely supportive of the McCanns and the abduction theory. 

[barrier]

Anyway, to get back on track I will reiterate my earlier point that I find it hard to believe that anyone would view the Netflix documentary as anything other than completely supportive of the McCanns and the abduction theory.

Is the theory right though?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Is the theory right though?

That is beside the point I was making.  This documentary series was entirely supportive of the abduction theory and of the McCanns and I find it hard to believe that anyone could come to a different conclusion.  Do you agree or disagree?

[G-Unit]

Anyway, to get back on track I will reiterate my earlier point that I find it hard to believe that anyone would view the Netflix documentary as anything other than completely supportive of the McCanns and the abduction theory.

So your opinion os the only possible opinion? That seems somewhat arrogant in my opinion.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So your opinion os the only possible opinion? That seems somewhat arrogant in my opinion.

That isn’t what I said is it?  In the same way that you find it hard to believe Madeleine was abducted, I find it hard to believe that the Netflix documentary could be viewed as anything other than supportive of the abduction theory and thr McCanns themselves.  Is your opinion about abduction the only possible opinion?

[Brietta]

That is beside the point I was making.  This documentary series was entirely supportive of the abduction theory and of the McCanns and I find it hard to believe that anyone could come to a different conclusion.  Do you agree or disagree?

I don't think Amaral did himself any favours by reiterating on Netflix ...
Snip
Although the sniffer dog and DNA evidence were widely discredited, Amaral told producers of the Netflix documentary:
"Talking about the DNA traces found in the car, let me tell you this. It's important to recognise it as a indication of the possibility that something was transported there.

"The body may have been hidden in some sort of freezer somewhere and been transported later in the boot of the car and bodily fluids may have dropped from the corpse.

"The freezer hypothesis originates from the circumstances. The car was rented many days after the disappearance and the possible death of the child.

"As to what happened to the body before that, whether it was decomposed, if it was buried, frozen, probably the most correct conclusion is that it was kept in a place where it could be preserved in the cold."

Amaral was removed from the case just six months after Madeleine went missing due to a series of failures.

http://www.ladbible.com/entertainment/film-and-tv-madeliene-mccann-cop-explains-theory-body-was-stored-in-freezer-20190321


The truth is beginning to emerge from the morass (or morais 🤪) of disinformation which has been put about for years as a more discerning audience weighs up what is possible and what is not.
From the same 'entertainment' article above ...
Snip
The outlandish claim has been circulating on the Internet for years thanks to conspiracy theory groups, and is based on some quite sketchy evidence that involves the use of sniffer dogs.

[G-Unit]

That isn’t what I said is it?  In the same way that you find it hard to believe Madeleine was abducted, I find it hard to believe that the Netflix documentary could be viewed as anything other than supportive of the abduction theory and thr McCanns themselves.  Is your opinion about abduction the only possible opinion?

There is a difference. You don't understand how anyne could reach a different conclusion about Netflix. I understand why people believe in the anduction.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There is a difference. You don't understand how anyne could reach a different conclusion about Netflix. I understand why people believe in the anduction.

Explain it to me then, seeing as I am obviously deficient in some way.  Explain how an 8 part documentary that never once examines in any depth the woke and wandered theory, or questions in any significant way the version of events laid out by the McCanns, that labours the point about child exploitation, sightings of Madeleine around the world, and shifty individuals seen in and around PdL at the time, that has numerous McCann sympathetic talking heads and one erstwhile PJ believer lambasting the PJ as liars was even-handed and impartial.  I look forward to being educated by yourself. 

[G-Unit]

Explain it to me then, seeing as I am obviously deficient in some way.  Explain how an 8 part documentary that never once examines in any depth the woke and wandered theory, or questions in any significant way the version of events laid out by the McCanns, that labours the point about child exploitation, sightings of Madeleine around the world, and shifty individuals seen in and around PdL at the time, that has numerous McCann sympathetic talking heads and one erstwhile PJ believer lambasting the PJ as liars was even-handed and impartial.  I look forward to being educated by yourself.

No.

[ShiningInLuz]

I bet Sky doesn’t incorrectly paraphrase people on internet forums though.  I think I would prefer to discuss things with her in future, she probably makes more sense.

How many barbed messages can you write because you put ANYONE in capitals?