Author Topic: Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.  (Read 196676 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

yes..its an english word

How does it relate to laconic?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

How does it relate to laconic?

that was the expression used...you and others are making an assumption it was  a joke

Offline faithlilly

I havent forgot anything...i think suggesting they are involved is ridiculous...based on teh evidence

And I disagree....based on the evidence.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

How does it relate to laconic?

What’s important is not the way Freud spoke but the words he said.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

And I disagree....based on the evidence.

its waht SY and teh PJ think thats important and not surprisingly everything points to them supporting my opinion

Offline Mr Gray

What’s important is not the way Freud spoke but the words he said.

in your opinion.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2019, 08:13:52 PM by slartibartfast »

Offline faithlilly

its waht SY and teh PJ think thats important and not surprisingly everything points to them supporting my opinion

We don’t know what SY and the PJ think.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

We don’t know what SY and the PJ think.

we have  a very good idea.... no evidence...no supects...abduction....Of course I may be wrong.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2019, 08:38:21 PM by Robittybob1 »

Offline faithlilly

we have  a very good idea.... no evidence...no supects...abduction....Of course I may be wrong and the flat earth is 6000 years old...but that would be ridiculous

We have no idea, that’s why we have no evidence or suspects. Individuals will not be named until they are arrested or made arguidos. We obviously have not got to that point yet.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

You forgot...unless they were involved.
Either the parents are psychopaths who did away with their child’s body and were having a laugh and a joke with Clement about the dogs or they weren’t and they did n’t and would therefore know that the dog alerts were rubbish.  Which is it in your view?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Is it too pedantic to point out the Kate in that quote admitted to breaking judicial secrecy ?
Please explain?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

CF= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/15/police-were-told-two-years-ago-about-clement-freuds-madeleine-mc/

Kate tells us in her book the CF joked about the dogs... it is in another thread.

And the smirking sniggering Gerry here-   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vh5ObkBM3c
There is another video of Gerry laughing in doors a couple of days after Madeleine went missing.  I find that difficult to explain.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline John

Either the parents are psychopaths who did away with their child’s body and were having a laugh and a joke with Clement about the dogs or they weren’t and they did n’t and would therefore know that the dog alerts were rubbish.  Which is it in your view?

I would suggest that Clement's witty laconic comment was an attempt to reassure the parents and to put them at their ease at which must have been an extremely stressful time.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

I would suggest that Clement's witty laconic comment was an attempt to reassure the parents and to put them at their ease at which must have been an extremely stressful time.
I would suggest you’re bang on the money there John.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline slartibartfast

I would suggest that Clement's witty laconic comment was an attempt to reassure the parents and to put them at their ease at which must have been an extremely stressful time.

Along with several  amusing  anecdotes.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.