Exhibit A and the Trial of D'Andre Lane.

[John]

Moderation

I have this morning instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease. Posters who continue to flaunt the rules despite this warning will be subject to a ban without further notice.

[Robittybob1]

As I've Saud grime has moved the goalpost significantly... It's all in the document.

DNA confirms remains IR blood... But not residual scent... It's all their... I'm quite good at reading and understanding long documents quickly but I wonder how others, will fair.

It raises some really interesting  questions... First being grime says only fresh teeth would cause an alert which destroys the claim Re the baby... Deciduous.. Teeth found in jersey

Could you please explain DNA confirms remains IR blood?

[Mr Gray]

Could you please explain DNA confirms remains IR blood?

DNA confirms remains and blood... Not residual scent.. Its in the white paper

It should read DNA or blood.. The I is next to the o on my phone keyboard

[Robittybob1]

DNA confirms remains and blood... Not residual scent.. Its in the white paper

Except in mixed samples - then they might be inconclusive.

[Mr Gray]

Except in mixed samples - then they might be inconclusive.

I'm quoting grime

[Robittybob1]

I'm quoting grime

I listened to a documentary that mentioned Perlin (??) who invented that new technique to sort out mixed samples and they were very positive about the results.  Lost track of the title now.

[Mr Gray]

I listened to a documentary that mentioned Perlin (??) who invented that new technique to sort out mixed samples and they were very positive about the results.  Lost track of the title now.

I was aware of it before  saunokonoko mentioned it.. True Allele

[Mr Gray]

The question I would like answered is why Grime in the Lane case sees the alerts as evidential but in the McCann case not

[The General]

The question I would like answered is why Grime in the Lane case sees the alerts as evidential but in the McCann case not

Funny you should say that, I've been thinking about just that.
Has anyone ever reached out to Martin? I wonder if he would be amenable to a conversation. I've found him on Linkedin, so it would be quite straightforward to ask.

[Mr Gray]

Funny you should say that, I've been thinking about just that.
Has anyone ever reached out to Martin? I wonder if he would be amenable to a conversation. I've found him on Linkedin, so it would be quite straightforward to ask.

He isn't... He's, running a course soon for dog handlers, with the specific instructions  not to ask questions Re the McCann case

[Mr Gray]

Funny you should say that, I've been thinking about just that.
Has anyone ever reached out to Martin? I wonder if he would be amenable to a conversation. I've found him on Linkedin, so it would be quite straightforward to ask.

It's a very important  question... No forensic confirmation in either case.   If the alerts are significant in the Lane case they should be significant in the McCann case

[The General]

He isn't... He's, running a course soon for dog handlers, with the specific instructions  not to ask questions Re the McCann case

Fair one. He's probably sick to the hind teeth of being grilled.

[Angelo222]

He isn't... He's, running a course soon for dog handlers, with the specific instructions  not to ask questions Re the McCann case

In keeping with the forum protocols can you cite for that claim please?

[faithlilly]

It's a very important  question... No forensic confirmation in either case.   If the alerts are significant in the Lane case they should be significant in the McCann case

They should be but different countries, different rules re admissible evidence.

[Mr Gray]

In keeping with the forum protocols can you cite for that claim please?

I will try... It's probably on the forum... Sil saw it..as did I think gunit.....should be easy enough to find