Exhibit A and the Trial of D'Andre Lane.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You find his account convincing?

Seriously?

I’ve already said he probably did it, but I wouldnt say the evidence against him put me beyond reasonable doubt.  I’m troubled by the accounts of two individuals, one of whom was a police officer at the time, who claims she is 100% certain she saw the child a week after thr incident, reported her sighting to the cop shop and they told her they wern’t interested because they knew the kid was dead, and this was before the dog alerts!  Plus the main evidence against him apart from the dog alerts was his girlfriend’s testimony and she now claims the child was alive after thr beating she claimed to have heard.

[Vertigo Swirl]

He was convicted because of the cadaver dog alerts & also because his account failed to convince a jury.

I can't imagine why not. He's got all the McCann supporters convinced.

I said he was CHARGED because of the dog alerts.  Grime obviously did a very good job convincing the jury that a dog alert is 100% infallible, no supporting evidence required because there was precious little else the cops had on him, apart from his previous record.

[Wonderfulspam]

I said he was CHARGED because of the dog alerts.  Grime obviously did a very good job convincing the jury that a dog alert is 100% infallible, no supporting evidence required because there was precious little else the cops had on him, apart from his previous record.

I know what you said, I'm not blind.

I'm also not gullible enough to believe there's even the remotest chance that D'Andre's ridiculous story has any truth to it.

[Robittybob1]

Do you not think it might depend on quantity?
If there were (say) 50 or 100 or more pieces of circumstantial evidence, rather than just a couple, would that not be much more significant?

Look I do understand how it works, but in some cases I still question it.

[Mr Gray]

There doesn't seem to be any explanation as to why Grime has made such a change on what corroborates an alert.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I know what you said, I'm not blind.

I'm also not gullible enough to believe there's even the remotest chance that D'Andre's ridiculous story has any truth to it.

I’m glad you’re not blind because that means you will have noticed there was no conclusive proof that he killed his daughter even if you refuse to admit it.

[Mr Gray]

I’m glad you’re not blind because that means you will have noticed there was no conclusive proof that he killed his daughter even if you refuse to admit it.

Just the cadaver dog that is almost never wrong alerting to the scent if death in several places associated with bianca

[Wonderfulspam]

I’m glad you’re not blind because that means you will have noticed there was no conclusive proof that he killed his daughter even if you refuse to admit it.

Either his daughter was abducted or he faked the abduction because she was dead.
It's obvious she wasn't abducted, so that just leaves dead.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Either his daughter was abducted or he faked the abduction because she was dead.
It's obvious she wasn't abducted, so that just leaves dead.

So the policewoman who is 100% certain she saw Bianca a week later in a house that she later discovered belonged to a relative of Bianca’s mother should just be ignored in your view?

[Wonderfulspam]

So the policewoman who is 100% certain she saw Bianca a week later in a house that she later discovered belonged to a relative of Bianca’s mother should just be ignored in your view?

I'm certain she was mistaken because it's obvious Bianca is dead.

What are you doing to help find Bianca?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm certain she was mistaken because it's obvious Bianca is dead.

What are you doing to help find Bianca?

What an incredibly stupid question, imo.  What should I be doing bearing in mind I agree that she is likely dead and probably at the hands of her father however I’m not certain of this and think the evidence against him was weak.  I would not be hugely shocked if it turned out he was wrongfully convicted and the child was still alive, but you would presumably be utterly gobsmacked and massively disappointed to be proven wrong if this was the case.  I guess I’m just not as arrogant and dogmatic as you appear to be.

[Wonderfulspam]

What an incredibly stupid question, imo.  What should I be doing bearing in mind I agree that she is likely dead and probably at the hands of her father however I’m not certain of this and think the evidence against him was weak.  I would not be hugely shocked if it turned out he was wrongfully convicted and the child was still alive, but you would presumably be utterly gobsmacked and massively disappointed to be proven wrong if this was the case.  I guess I’m just not as arrogant and dogmatic as you appear to be.

I'm certain she won't be found & her father will rot in prison where he belongs for years to come.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm certain she won't be found & her father will rot in prison where he belongs for years to come.

Well good for you!  Your certainty makes not a jot of difference to the fact that the evidence against him was weak.

[Miss Taken Identity]

What reason did he give?

He hasn't claimed he is being framed has he?. He could pull the race card, but the he said it was black men who kidknapped his daughter...

[Mr Gray]

Morse failed to alert to the car seat back at the station when it was wrapped in brown paper.