Exhibit A and the Trial of D'Andre Lane.

[faithlilly]

the judge seemed to think that the alert evidence was very important....yet previously grime was clear...the alerts themselves have no evidential reliability

And ?

[Robittybob1]

martin smith and family seeing gerry mccann carrrying a child...

you must realise harrison said physical evidence was required and grime said as no remains were found then the alerts could not BECOME corroborated

That statement by the Smiths came after the statement by Martin Grime.   So it wasn't an anecdotal statement at the time.
Any others you can think of?

[Robittybob1]

the judge seemed to think that the alert evidence was very important....yet previously grime was clear...the alerts themselves have no evidential reliability

.... no evidential reliability without corroborating evidence (DNA etc). "  He actually used the term "etc" in a statement which makes the list undefined IMO.

[Mr Gray]

.... no evidential reliability without corroborating evidence (DNA etc). "  He actually used the term "etc" in a statement which makes the list undefined IMO.

thats in relation to the CSI dog...not cadaver......its in his white paper

[Robittybob1]

thats in relation to the CSI dog...not cadaver......its in his white paper

I tend to think you  are proving Harrison was lying, when he said there was a need for physical evidence, for what sort of physical evidence could be found?    If DNA wasn't enough, what is left?

Was a finger or a fingernail likely to be found at this stage?

[Mr Gray]

I tend to think you  are proving Harrison was lying, when he said there was a need for physical evidence, for what sort of physical evidence could be found?    If DNA wasn't enough, what is left?

i dont think for a second harrison was lying...physical evidence taken with grimes sateemnt is human remains..dna does not confirnm a cadaver alert

[The General]

i dont think for a second harrison was lying...physical evidence taken with grimes sateemnt is human remains..dna does not confirnm a cadaver alert

Dav, is there a B side?

[Robittybob1]

i dont think for a second harrison was lying...physical evidence taken with grimes sateemnt is human remains..dna does not confirnm a cadaver alert

Of course but where can the human remains come from?  If she was found in a skip bin would that do?

[Robittybob1]

Dav, is there a B side?

Yes but it will sound like another version of side A.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Dav, is there a B side?

The B-side is the instrumental remix, not worth bothering with.

[Mr Gray]

.... no evidential reliability without corroborating evidence (DNA etc). "  He actually used the term "etc" in a statement which makes the list undefined IMO.

which statement ...cite

[Mr Gray]

Dav, is there a B side?

yes why dont  you go to it

[Mr Gray]

Of course but where can the human remains come from?  If she was found in a skip bin would that do?

no...not according to grime

[Robittybob1]

which statement ...cite

We've already been there, you say it only applies to the CSI dog. 

[Robittybob1]

no...not according to grime

And would you be happy with that?  If a body was found in a skip bin and the dog alerted in the McCann's apartment that is evidence the death occurred in the apartment, or at least the cadaver had been in the apartment? 

I don't think you would personally.