Author Topic: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?  (Read 39068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #135 on: July 06, 2019, 06:44:43 PM »

sorry...when you said further information I assumed you meant something relevant.  (Remark deleted)

Oh dear!
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 07:23:21 PM by Angelo222 »
What's up, old man?

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #136 on: July 06, 2019, 07:15:58 PM »
Do you think/ believe must Smithman is Gerry McCann?
If so, how does this fit in with your belief in the woke and wandered theory?

I don't given the statements made by those in the tapas bar that night which means that it is just one more terrible coincidence and unfortunate for Gerry. Certainly, Martin Smith's insistence that it was Gerry he encountered on the street that night simply muddies the water even more.  The chap the Smith's saw could very well have been carrying Maddie and could very well have resembled GM.

It strikes me as sinister that despite all the publicity surrounding Maddie's disappearance and the Smith's sighting that an innocent local or a tourist have never come forward
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 07:27:10 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #137 on: July 06, 2019, 08:37:06 PM »
Given the resemblance to Gerry McCann I have always felt that the McCanns and their team have sought to play down the Smith sighting.  Strange though given that Smithman has NEVER BEEN FOUND.

Why would they play it down if they knew it wasn't GM?

And play it down is an under statement.... They ignored it for weeks (maybe months) whilst dishing out all sorts of nonsense on "suspects"? If they really wanted an abductor - why ignore a report of a man carrying a child the same age as MM?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #138 on: July 06, 2019, 09:05:41 PM »
has the smith sighting been promoted in portugal....I dont think it has...that may explain things
Good to see you joining in Davel.  [Just waking up D.]
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 09:11:26 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #139 on: July 06, 2019, 09:52:30 PM »
I don't given the statements made by those in the tapas bar that night which means that it is just one more terrible coincidence and unfortunate for Gerry. Certainly, Martin Smith's insistence that it was Gerry he encountered on the street that night simply muddies the water even more.  The chap the Smith's saw could very well have been carrying Maddie and could very well have resembled GM.

It strikes me as sinister that despite all the publicity surrounding Maddie's disappearance and the Smith's sighting that an innocent local or a tourist have never come forward

All the witnesses believe it was Madeleine in a deep sleep so that would explain why he will NEVER come forward!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #140 on: July 06, 2019, 10:32:51 PM »
All the witnesses believe it was Madeleine in a deep sleep so that would explain why he will NEVER come forward!

But why didn't Clarence want to find him?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #141 on: July 06, 2019, 10:35:08 PM »
But why didn't Clarence want to find him?

Because he was paid to do what he was told to do.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline misty

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #142 on: July 07, 2019, 12:51:07 AM »
But why didn't Clarence want to find him?

More importantly, why didn't the PJ want to find Smithman between 3rd May & 6th September 2007?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #143 on: July 07, 2019, 03:33:19 AM »
More importantly, why didn't the PJ want to find Smithman between 3rd May & 6th September 2007?

When did Miguel hand in the CCTV recordings?  I know that the Smith's reported their findings about 2 weeks  after Madeleine went missing, so the PJ would not be looking for Smithman till then. 

But I do believe the PJ were certain Gerry had an alibi for the 10:00 O'clock time frame.  So the 10:00 PM time frame did not excite the PJ.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #144 on: July 07, 2019, 07:13:07 AM »
I don't given the statements made by those in the tapas bar that night which means that it is just one more terrible coincidence and unfortunate for Gerry. Certainly, Martin Smith's insistence that it was Gerry he encountered on the street that night simply muddies the water even more.  The chap the Smith's saw could very well have been carrying Maddie and could very well have resembled GM.

It strikes me as sinister that despite all the publicity surrounding Maddie's disappearance and the Smith's sighting that an innocent local or a tourist have never come forward

Afaiaa the Smith sighting has never been promoted in portugal,  the most important country in the investigation
This may be, the very reason he has never been traced

Offline barrier

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #145 on: July 07, 2019, 08:30:15 AM »
I don't given the statements made by those in the tapas bar that night which means that it is just one more terrible coincidence and unfortunate for Gerry. Certainly, Martin Smith's insistence that it was Gerry he encountered on the street that night simply muddies the water even more.  The chap the Smith's saw could very well have been carrying Maddie and could very well have resembled GM.

It strikes me as sinister that despite all the publicity surrounding Maddie's disappearance and the Smith's sighting that an innocent local or a tourist have never come forward

Ever thought maybe there isn't one.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #146 on: July 07, 2019, 11:00:03 AM »
Ever thought maybe there isn't one.
Are you suggesting the Smiths were lying?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #147 on: July 07, 2019, 11:05:32 AM »
Are you suggesting the Smiths were lying?

No he's suggesting there might not be an innocent tourist or a local... It's quite clear

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #148 on: July 07, 2019, 11:11:14 AM »
No he's suggesting there might not be an innocent tourist or a local... It's quite clear
No it is not clear.  You have to ask why there isn't "an innocent tourist or a local"?

One of the reasons could be that the Smiths are lying.
Well what reason does Barrier put forward himself?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is it true the PJ may have "Smithman" on video?
« Reply #149 on: July 07, 2019, 01:54:31 PM »
Or that Smithman was indeed GM, IMO. That would explain why Mitchell ignored a credible sighting of an “abducter”.
Are you of the opinion that Mitchell knows Smithman was Gerry?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".