Is It Possible For A Non Professional Investigator To Solve The Case?

[Holly Goodhead]

Have you been brushing up on 'How to Win Friends and Influence People'?   

Indicative by the fact my post count v 'likes' is the lowest on the board 

[Vertigo Swirl]

John and Myster think my Bamber theories are a) pants and have told me and b) have told the forum.  Why would this case be any different?

I wasn’t aware of that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's evidence that they were unlocked on 3rd May at 9:30pm. There is no evidence they were unlocked at other times.

Why does Holly’s theory depend on the patio doors being unlocked at other times?

[Holly Goodhead]

I wasn’t aware of that.

I was the only regular contributor to the Bamber board who believes in his innocence. 

This case is different in that at this moment in time it remains unsolved.  The Bamber case imo involves Britain's worst miscarriage of justice since capital punishment.  Bamber was convicted in 1986 at the age of 25; he's now 58 yoa and serving a whole life tariff.  He spent a year on remand so has been in jail a total of 34 years.

[Mr Gray]

I was the only regular contributor to the Bamber board who believes in his innocence. 

This case is different in that at this moment in time it remains unsolved.  The Bamber case imo involves Britain's worst miscarriage of justice since capital punishment.  Bamber was convicted in 1986 at the age of 25; he's now 58 yoa and serving a whole life tariff.  He spent a year on remand so has been in jail a total of 34 years.

So what have John and Myster said about your Mccann theory

[Robittybob1]

So what have John and Myster said about your Mccann theory

Are you going to present it on the member's only board?

[G-Unit]

Why does Holly’s theory depend on the patio doors being unlocked at other times?

As I understood it, the 'abductor' watched the parents using those doors to check on the children every evening.

[Mr Gray]

Are you going to present it on the member's only board?

Why are you asking me

[Vertigo Swirl]

As I understood it, the 'abductor' watched the parents using those doors to check on the children every evening.

Didn’t they?

[G-Unit]

Didn’t they?

I don't know and no-one else can prove they did.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't know and no-one else can prove they did.

Out of interest how would you go about proving such a thing, to your satisfaction?

[G-Unit]

Out of interest how would you go about proving such a thing, to your satisfaction?

I've seen no reported sightings of the parents using the patio doors to carry out their checks. Even their friends professed not to know.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I've seen no reported sightings of the parents using the patio doors to carry out their checks. Even their friends professed not to know.

And if there was a reported sighting of the parents using the patio doors and if their friends said they did, would that be the proof you needed?

[Holly Goodhead]

So what have John and Myster said about your Mccann theory

Myster has been in receipt of since Wed but John only since yesterday as I was awaiting an email address.   

I wrote it all out by hand initially and then emailed.  My writing is average size and I filled nearly 5 A4 pages.  Its quite comprehensive so they will no doubt want to ponder it!

If it was pants in all probability Myster would have been on to say as much.

In the wake of the Carl Beech fiasco I'm considering sending it to Katharine Viner, editor, at the Guardian as potentially if I'm right it once again calls into question competency at the MET.

[Mr Gray]

Myster has been in receipt of since Wed but John only since yesterday as I was awaiting an email address.   

I wrote it all out by hand initially and then emailed.  My writing is average size and I filled nearly 5 A4 pages.  Its quite comprehensive so they will no doubt want to ponder it!

If it was pants in all probability Myster would have been on to say as much.

In the wake of the Carl Beech fiasco I'm considering sending it to Katharine Viner, editor, at the Guardian as potentially if I'm right it once again calls into question competency at the MET.

It's a theory of which there are many... Nothing more imo