Is It Possible For A Non Professional Investigator To Solve The Case?

[Holly Goodhead]

It's a theory of which there are many... Nothing more imo

You have no knowledge of it whatsoever so how can you possibly know?

And it isn't just a 'theory'.  It's a detailed account of what happened, how, who was involved etc. 

[jassi]

Until proved it remains a theory however detailed it might be.

[Wonderfulspam]

SY & the PJ have spent umpteen years & in excess of 12 million squids investigating this case when all they needed to do was join this forum, message Holly & the case would be solved 

[Mr Gray]

You have no knowledge of it whatsoever so how can you possibly know?

And it isn't just a 'theory'.  It's a detailed account of what happened, how, who was involved etc.

I know because you only have access to what is in the public domain and there is precious little evidence. You are making a totally unsubstantiated claim...its quite a reasonable stance to disbeleive in the circumstances. I presume Myster is just being polite having had 4 days to read it...lets see what he says. Im 100% convinced you are wrong to claim to have solved the case ....I repeat ...what you have is a theory.  We will see who is corrct shortly...hopefully

[Vertigo Swirl]

You have no knowledge of it whatsoever so how can you possibly know?

And it isn't just a 'theory'.  It's a detailed account of what happened, how, who was involved etc.

How can it possibly be a detailed account of what happened? 

[Mr Gray]

You have no knowledge of it whatsoever so how can you possibly know?

And it isn't just a 'theory'.  It's a detailed account of what happened, how, who was involved etc.

its a detailed account of what you think happened with no evidence....Myster has had this sensational revelation for four days and hasnt bothered to mention it...Johns had this supposed sensational revealtion for two days and hasnt mentioned it...SY have had it for 3 months...how long have the PJ had it...do you think your claim sounds in any way credible?

[Vertigo Swirl]

its a detailed account of what you think happened with no evidence....Myster has had this sensational revelation for four days and hasnt bothered to mention it...Johns had this supposed sensational revealtion for two days and hasnt mentioned it...SY have had it for 3 months...how long have the PJ had it...do you think your claim sounds in any way credible?

Perhaps they are all just gobsmacked by the brilliance of the account that they are lost for words?

[Myster]

Unfortunately for Holly, my opinion hasn't changed, even though I've given her theory serious thought and consideration.  The problem we have is in revealing names and implicating people (who imo are completely innocent) on an open public forum, when most here are itching to know who she suspects and why she is so insistent on them being responsible for MBM's disappearance.

[Wonderfulspam]

It was Mrs Fenn wasn't it.

I always knew she dunnit.

[Mr Gray]

Unfortunately for Holly, my opinion hasn't changed, even though I've given her theory serious thought and consideration.  The problem we have is in revealing names and implicating people (who imo are completely innocent) on an open public forum, when most here are itching to know who she suspects and why she is so insistent on them being responsible for MBM's disappearance.

as you say its  a theory...and you obviously dont agree with her theory. Im not really itching to know who here suspects are because its obvious her suspicions are not based on facts

[Vertigo Swirl]

Unfortunately for Holly, my opinion hasn't changed, even though I've given her theory serious thought and consideration.  The problem we have is in revealing names and implicating people (who imo are completely innocent) on an open public forum, when most here are itching to know who she suspects and why she is so insistent on them being responsible for MBM's disappearance.

Her suspect is a petite female holidaymaker.  That’s enough to know that the theory is pretty pants IMO.

[G-Unit]

Unfortunately for Holly, my opinion hasn't changed, even though I've given her theory serious thought and consideration.  The problem we have is in revealing names and implicating people (who imo are completely innocent) on an open public forum, when most here are itching to know who she suspects and why she is so insistent on them being responsible for MBM's disappearance.

I was horrified to hear that a potentially innocent person had been named to the police, but at least that will go no further. It would be completely irresponsible in my opinion to name names on the Forum.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I was horrified to hear that a potentially innocent person had been named to the police, but at least that will go no further. It would be completely irresponsible in my opinion to name names on the Forum.

Would you have been so horrified if the theory had put forward one of the Tapas group?  I doubt it!

[Holly Goodhead]

SY & the PJ have spent umpteen years & in excess of 12 million squids investigating this case when all they needed to do was join this forum, message Holly & the case would be solved 

Why such faith in SY after the damning report by high court judge Sir Richard Henriques into the Carl Beech case?

[Holly Goodhead]

I was horrified to hear that a potentially innocent person had been named to the police, but at least that will go no further. It would be completely irresponsible in my opinion to name names on the Forum.

'Horrified' that's a bit strong isn't it especially given the Carl Beech fiasco?