Is It Possible For A Non Professional Investigator To Solve The Case?

[barrier]

Davel I rather suspect if in the coming weeks there's some 'breaking news' about the case you will see this as a coincidence rather than anything to do with my email to Op Grange.

I rather suspect we'll see another prime minister before that happen's (no they are not connected).

[G-Unit]

No G-Unit I have said numerous times I see T9 as unreliable witnesses so have not relied upon their testimonies at all with regard to my email to OG.

At one point you said that after a McCann check the 'watcher/abductor' would know they had 30 minutes in which to get the child. The only evidence of these 30 minute checks is the statements of the T9.

[Mr Gray]

Davel I rather suspect if in the coming weeks there's some 'breaking news' about the case you will see this as a coincidence rather than anything to do with my email to Op Grange.

If maddie is found alive and was taken by holidaymakers then we will know its you...

[Holly Goodhead]

At one point you said that after a McCann check the 'watcher/abductor' would know they had 30 minutes in which to get the child. The only evidence of these 30 minute checks is the statements of the T9.

Did I?  If I did maybe it was when I first arrived here and was new to the case.  I can assure you my email to OG does not refer to anything in T9 wit stats.

[Holly Goodhead]

If maddie is found alive and was taken by holidaymakers then we will know its you...

I think the authorities will struggle to find a connection with me in Algarve at said time but you never know innocent people have been imprisoned for less!  Hopefully you and others here would campaign for my release if such a situation arose 

[Mr Gray]

I think the authorities will struggle to find a connection with me in Algarve at said time but you never know innocent people have been imprisoned for less!  Hopefully you and others here would campaign for my release if such a situation arose 

 I think you've misunderstood my post

[Holly Goodhead]

I think you've misunderstood my post

I thought you were joking that I'm the perp.  Ok I see so you're saying if holidaymakers and MM found then you'll know its down to me.   

[G-Unit]

Did I?  If I did maybe it was when I first arrived here and was new to the case.  I can assure you my email to OG does not refer to anything in T9 wit stats.

If you're assuming that MM was in that bed and was taken from it between 8:30 and 10pm, that the patio doors were unlocked or that the window and shutter were open you're relying on T9 statements.

[Robittybob1]

I believe a misguided altruistic one but I can't be sure.

OK once again paralleling my theory.

[Robittybob1]

No G-Unit I have said numerous times I see T9 as unreliable witnesses so have not relied upon their testimonies at all with regard to my email to OG.

Why would the T9 be giving unreliable witness testimonies?

[Robittybob1]

Most other witnesses, police officers and experts.

How about naming 5 of these people?

[Robittybob1]

If you're assuming that MM was in that bed and was taken from it between 8:30 and 10pm, that the patio doors were unlocked or that the window and shutter were open you're relying on T9 statements.

Others knew the patio door was unlocked.

[Holly Goodhead]

If you're assuming that MM was in that bed and was taken from it between 8:30 and 10pm, that the patio doors were unlocked or that the window and shutter were open you're relying on T9 statements.

No.  Numerous others have testified as to what T9's game was in the evening with regard to "childcare arrangements" eg OC employees, Mrs Fenn, JW/BO. 

[G-Unit]

No.  Numerous others have testified as to what T9's game was in the evening with regard to "childcare arrangements" eg OC employees, Mrs Fenn, JW/BO.

None of them saw her being put to bed on 3rd May.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You are perfectly entitled to think whatever you want but it doesn't make you right and me wrong.

You battle away 24/7 with those here who believe the parents are responsible and then when someone relatively new comes along with an extremely well thought out and detailed theory where all the pieces fit together puuuuurfectly supporting stranger abduction you still want to disagree.  Maybe you're just well disagreeable despite being a lovely fella in every way.

Excuse me, but I only have your word for it that your theory is extremely well thought out, and that all the pieces fit together puuuuuurfectly.   Am I just supposed to congratulate and thank you without knowing any detail?   I'm sure if you had the courage of your convictions you would post your theory in the private section of this forum for all of us to marvel over, or more likely tell you why it wasn't so perfect after all, which is no doubt the real reason you don't want to tell us.