Is It Possible For A Non Professional Investigator To Solve The Case?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So when you claimed 'knowledge' you had none.  Then you claimed I had a poor memory.

Now you are claiming another option.

Would I bet on a nag with this track record?

If Holly has cracked this case how do you account for your failure to do so despite your diligent efforts over the last few years?  What’s she got that you haven’t?

[ShiningInLuz]

If Holly has cracked this case how do you account for your failure to do so despite your diligent efforts over the last few years?  What’s she got that you haven’t?

As I have no idea what her theory is, how would I know?

 

[Mr Gray]

So when you claimed 'knowledge' you had none.  Then you claimed I had a poor memory.

Now you are claiming another option.

Would I bet on a nag with this track record?

I've certainly got enough knowledge to know Holly hasn't cracked the case... It's impossible for her to do so... She has a theory... That's all

[Vertigo Swirl]

As I have no idea what her theory is, how would I know?

 

You know what she knows, yet you have failed to crack the case.  She’s obviously smarter than you are, right?

[ShiningInLuz]

You know what she knows, yet you have failed to crack the case.  She’s obviously smarter than you are, right?

As English appears to be your first language, why do you misunderstand or misrepresent what I have said?

Repeat - I have no idea what Holly's idea is, so I am in no position to critique it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As English appears to be your first language, why do you misunderstand or misrepresent what I have said?

Repeat - I have no idea what Holly's idea is, so I am in no position to critique it.

I’m not asking you to critique it, I’m asking you why she has been able to crack the case (allegedly) when she has the same access to the information that you (who has been studying the case for years) have clearly not.  Is English your first language btw?

[ShiningInLuz]

I've certainly got enough knowledge to know Holly hasn't cracked the case... It's impossible for her to do so... She has a theory... That's all

You've now gone round full circle.

So once again, what is this knowledge you speak of, o wise man?

[Mr Gray]

You've now gone round full circle.

So once again, what is this knowledge you speak of, o wise man?

First is the fact that there is not enough evidence in the public domain to solve the case....that is a fact
second a a real red flag is hollys claim that the case is easy to solve...thats absurd
The whole idea of holly being able to solve the case is completely absurd.

[ShiningInLuz]

I’m not asking you to critique it, I’m asking you why she has been able to crack the case (allegedly) when she has the same access to the information that you (who has been studying the case for years) have clearly not.  Is English your first language btw?

You most certainly are asking me to critique it, though I have said repeatedly I don't know what Holly's theory is.

A childish game, good only for clocking up post counts.

[ShiningInLuz]

First is the fact that there is not enough evidence in the public domain to solve the case....that is a fact
second a a real red flag is hollys claim that the case is easy to solve...thats absurd
The whole idea of holly being able to solve the case is completely absurd.

So you have no knowledge, merely opinion?  Oh dear!

[Mr Gray]

So you have no knowledge, merely opinion?  Oh dear!

My post shows knowledge and is based on facts..hollys is opinion based on opinion

[Vertigo Swirl]

You most certainly are asking me to critique it, though I have said repeatedly I don't know what Holly's theory is.

A childish game, good only for clocking up post counts.

Dear me, you really don’t understand plain English do you?  Put it this way: do you accept that it is perfectly possible that Holly (who has only been studying the case for a few weeks) has been able to work out what you have not over the course of many years, i.e: what happened and who did it? 

[Robittybob1]

Posters have been sanctioned for posting about the abductor... As though it were a fact... Now it seems its perfectly acceptable.

So that's one positive... Is now acceptable to state as a fact that maddie was abducted

Well if you can also say you've got enough facts to prove it.

[Mr Gray]

Well if you can also say you've got enough facts to prove it.

So what facts has Holly got...

[Robittybob1]

I wonder what Holly's excuses will be when nothing comes of her emails to SY and the PJ

I've been thinking of the likes of Sadie and Pathfinder, with no result even many years later and still unable to say what their theory was fully.